2019-04-29 07:55:21

by Wen Gong

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2] ath10k: add support for simulate crash on SDIO chip

The command to simulate firmware crash:
echo soft > /sys/kernel/debug/ieee80211/phy0/ath10k/simulate_fw_crash

It will send WMI_FORCE_FW_HANG_ASSERT to firmware, then it will trigger
CPU interrupt status register for SDIO chip, ath10k driver need to
configure it while enable SDIO interrupt, otherwise ath10k driver will
not get the assert error info.

After this change, it will success for simulate firmware crash.

Tested with QCA6174 SDIO with firmware
WLAN.RMH.4.4.1-00007-QCARMSWP-1.

Signed-off-by: Wen Gong <[email protected]>
---
v2: add MBOX_CPU_STATUS_ENABLE_ASSERT_MASK for fw assert check
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/hw.h | 1 +
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.c | 10 ++++++++--
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/hw.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/hw.h
index 7131499..60521ed 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/hw.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/hw.h
@@ -1095,6 +1095,7 @@ struct ath10k_hw_ops {
#define MBOX_CPU_INT_STATUS_ENABLE_ADDRESS 0x00000819
#define MBOX_CPU_INT_STATUS_ENABLE_BIT_LSB 0
#define MBOX_CPU_INT_STATUS_ENABLE_BIT_MASK 0x000000ff
+#define MBOX_CPU_STATUS_ENABLE_ASSERT_MASK 0x00000001
#define MBOX_ERROR_STATUS_ENABLE_ADDRESS 0x0000081a
#define MBOX_ERROR_STATUS_ENABLE_RX_UNDERFLOW_LSB 1
#define MBOX_ERROR_STATUS_ENABLE_RX_UNDERFLOW_MASK 0x00000002
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.c
index fae56c6..1a3a7bf 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.c
@@ -850,6 +850,10 @@ static int ath10k_sdio_mbox_proc_cpu_intr(struct ath10k *ar)

out:
mutex_unlock(&irq_data->mtx);
+ if (cpu_int_status & MBOX_CPU_STATUS_ENABLE_ASSERT_MASK) {
+ ath10k_err(ar, "firmware crashed!\n");
+ queue_work(ar->workqueue, &ar->restart_work);
+ }
return ret;
}

@@ -1495,8 +1499,10 @@ static int ath10k_sdio_hif_enable_intrs(struct ath10k *ar)
regs->int_status_en |=
FIELD_PREP(MBOX_INT_STATUS_ENABLE_MBOX_DATA_MASK, 1);

- /* Set up the CPU Interrupt status Register */
- regs->cpu_int_status_en = 0;
+ /* Set up the CPU Interrupt Status Register, enable CPU sourced interrupt #0
+ * #0 is used for report assertion from target
+ */
+ regs->cpu_int_status_en = FIELD_PREP(MBOX_CPU_STATUS_ENABLE_ASSERT_MASK, 1);

/* Set up the Error Interrupt status Register */
regs->err_int_status_en =
--
1.9.1


2019-05-15 02:53:39

by Claire Chang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ath10k: add support for simulate crash on SDIO chip

Tested-by: Claire Chang <[email protected]>

If this patch adds support for detecting the real firmware assert,
maybe the title should be "add support for _crash recovery_ on SDIO
chip"

2019-05-22 06:27:46

by Wen Gong

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] ath10k: add support for simulate crash on SDIO chip

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ath10k <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Claire
> Chang
> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2019 10:53 AM
> To: Wen Gong <[email protected]>
> Cc: open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS (WIRELESS) <linux-
> [email protected]>; [email protected]
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2] ath10k: add support for simulate crash on SDIO
> chip
>
> Tested-by: Claire Chang <[email protected]>
>
> If this patch adds support for detecting the real firmware assert,
> maybe the title should be "add support for _crash recovery_ on SDIO
> chip"
Yes, seems this title is more appropriate.
>
> _______________________________________________
> ath10k mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

2019-05-28 02:56:54

by Wen Gong

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] ath10k: add support for simulate crash on SDIO chip

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ath10k <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Wen Gong
> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2019 2:24 PM
> To: Claire Chang <[email protected]>; Wen Gong
> <[email protected]>
> Cc: open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS (WIRELESS) <linux-
> [email protected]>; [email protected]
> Subject: [EXT] RE: [PATCH v2] ath10k: add support for simulate crash on SDIO
> chip
> > Tested-by: Claire Chang <[email protected]>
> >
> > If this patch adds support for detecting the real firmware assert,
> > maybe the title should be "add support for _crash recovery_ on SDIO
> > chip"
> Yes, seems this title is more appropriate.
Hi Claire
New patch has uploaded for the change
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10955189/
[v3] ath10k: add support for firmware crash recovery on SDIO chip