On 9/25/23 18:51, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Mon, 2023-09-25 at 18:49 +0530, Aditya Kumar Singh wrote:
>>>
>>> Perhaps we should just get rid of sdata_dereference() entirely, after
>>> all, it's the same now, just the arguments are switched for no good
>>> reason.
>> Yup agreed. Are you already aware of any WIP in this regards? If not, I
>> can take care for the CSA part at least in same series (in a different
>> patch obviously :) )
>
> No, I was just thinking out loud now :)
Sure.
>
> It'd be a trivial spatch, but I guess it'd be nicer to not have all that
> "sdata->local->hw.wiphy" in there if there's already another local or
> even wiphy variable in the function. And then while that's probably
> still possible in spatch, it's no longer trivial ;-)
Haha! Okay, let me see what I can do.