2013-10-11 20:25:23

by John W. Linville

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [ANN] wireless-regdb: master-2013-10-11

(Cutting the short log, since the original version got classified as
SPAM on vger.kernel.org...??)

A new release of wireless-regdb (master-2013-10-11) is available at:

http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/network/wireless-regdb/wireless-regdb-2013.10.11.tar.gz

Here is the short log of the changes included since the 2013-02-13
release:

SNIP -- you'll have to check it yourself:

git log master-2013-02-13..master-2013-10-11 | git shortlog

--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
[email protected] might be all we have. Be ready.


2013-10-11 20:45:17

by John W. Linville

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [ANN] wireless-regdb: master-2013-10-11

On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 04:24:59PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> (Cutting the short log, since the original version got classified as
> SPAM on vger.kernel.org...??)
>
> A new release of wireless-regdb (master-2013-10-11) is available at:
>
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/network/wireless-regdb/wireless-regdb-2013.10.11.tar.gz
>
> Here is the short log of the changes included since the 2013-02-13
> release:
>
> SNIP -- you'll have to check it yourself:
>
> git log master-2013-02-13..master-2013-10-11 | git shortlog

FYI -- I've purged my folders of all other old/pending wireless-regdb
stuff. If you have a change that you still want to propose to the
regulatory database, please send it as a _patch_ at your leisure.

Thanks,

John
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
[email protected] might be all we have. Be ready.

2013-11-04 19:30:13

by John W. Linville

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [ANN] wireless-regdb: master-2013-10-11

On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 12:32:39AM +0100, Thomas B?chler wrote:
> Am 11.10.2013 22:24, schrieb John W. Linville:
> > (Cutting the short log, since the original version got classified as
> > SPAM on vger.kernel.org...??)
> >
> > A new release of wireless-regdb (master-2013-10-11) is available at:
> >
> > http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/network/wireless-regdb/wireless-regdb-2013.10.11.tar.gz
> >
> > Here is the short log of the changes included since the 2013-02-13
> > release:
> >
> > SNIP -- you'll have to check it yourself:
>
> We can't use the database file:
>
> $ regdbdump regulatory.bin
> Database signature verification failed.

OK, I probably screwed-up something. I'll investigate, but it may
take few days while I recover from some extended travel...

--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
[email protected] might be all we have. Be ready.

2013-10-31 23:41:54

by Thomas Bächler

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [ANN] wireless-regdb: master-2013-10-11

Am 11.10.2013 22:24, schrieb John W. Linville:
> (Cutting the short log, since the original version got classified as
> SPAM on vger.kernel.org...??)
>
> A new release of wireless-regdb (master-2013-10-11) is available at:
>
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/network/wireless-regdb/wireless-regdb-2013.10.11.tar.gz
>
> Here is the short log of the changes included since the 2013-02-13
> release:
>
> SNIP -- you'll have to check it yourself:

We can't use the database file:

$ regdbdump regulatory.bin
Database signature verification failed.



Attachments:
signature.asc (901.00 B)
OpenPGP digital signature

2013-11-20 16:30:19

by John W. Linville

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [ANN] wireless-regdb: master-2013-10-11

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 11:29:50AM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 8:18 PM, John W. Linville <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 12:32:39AM +0100, Thomas B?chler wrote:
> >> Am 11.10.2013 22:24, schrieb John W. Linville:
> >> > (Cutting the short log, since the original version got classified as
> >> > SPAM on vger.kernel.org...??)
> >> >
> >> > A new release of wireless-regdb (master-2013-10-11) is available at:
> >> >
> >> > http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/network/wireless-regdb/wireless-regdb-2013.10.11.tar.gz
> >> >
> >> > Here is the short log of the changes included since the 2013-02-13
> >> > release:
> >> >
> >> > SNIP -- you'll have to check it yourself:
> >>
> >> We can't use the database file:
> >>
> >> $ regdbdump regulatory.bin
> >> Database signature verification failed.
> >
> > OK, I probably screwed-up something. I'll investigate, but it may
> > take few days while I recover from some extended travel...
>
> Hey John, it seems other folks are reporting this as well [0].
>
> [0] http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7440278.html

Sorry, I dropped the ball after I couldn't replicate the problem
locally. Does anyone have a suggestion as to what the issue might be?

John
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
[email protected] might be all we have. Be ready.

2013-11-20 17:00:18

by John W. Linville

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [ANN] wireless-regdb: master-2013-10-11

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 11:25:38AM -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 11:29:50AM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 8:18 PM, John W. Linville <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 12:32:39AM +0100, Thomas B?chler wrote:
> > >> Am 11.10.2013 22:24, schrieb John W. Linville:
> > >> > (Cutting the short log, since the original version got classified as
> > >> > SPAM on vger.kernel.org...??)
> > >> >
> > >> > A new release of wireless-regdb (master-2013-10-11) is available at:
> > >> >
> > >> > http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/network/wireless-regdb/wireless-regdb-2013.10.11.tar.gz
> > >> >
> > >> > Here is the short log of the changes included since the 2013-02-13
> > >> > release:
> > >> >
> > >> > SNIP -- you'll have to check it yourself:
> > >>
> > >> We can't use the database file:
> > >>
> > >> $ regdbdump regulatory.bin
> > >> Database signature verification failed.
> > >
> > > OK, I probably screwed-up something. I'll investigate, but it may
> > > take few days while I recover from some extended travel...
> >
> > Hey John, it seems other folks are reporting this as well [0].
> >
> > [0] http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7440278.html
>
> Sorry, I dropped the ball after I couldn't replicate the problem
> locally. Does anyone have a suggestion as to what the issue might be?

Hmmm...actually, I may have accidentally regeneratd a key. I'm not
sure why this didn't seem to cause a problem for me...

Can someone try to verify the signature on the attached regulatory.bin file?

John
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
[email protected] might be all we have. Be ready.


Attachments:
(No filename) (1.67 kB)
regulatory.bin (3.75 kB)
Download all attachments

2013-11-20 10:30:11

by Luis Chamberlain

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [ANN] wireless-regdb: master-2013-10-11

On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 8:18 PM, John W. Linville <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 12:32:39AM +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>> Am 11.10.2013 22:24, schrieb John W. Linville:
>> > (Cutting the short log, since the original version got classified as
>> > SPAM on vger.kernel.org...??)
>> >
>> > A new release of wireless-regdb (master-2013-10-11) is available at:
>> >
>> > http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/network/wireless-regdb/wireless-regdb-2013.10.11.tar.gz
>> >
>> > Here is the short log of the changes included since the 2013-02-13
>> > release:
>> >
>> > SNIP -- you'll have to check it yourself:
>>
>> We can't use the database file:
>>
>> $ regdbdump regulatory.bin
>> Database signature verification failed.
>
> OK, I probably screwed-up something. I'll investigate, but it may
> take few days while I recover from some extended travel...

Hey John, it seems other folks are reporting this as well [0].

[0] http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7440278.html

Luis

2013-11-20 18:08:09

by Thomas Bächler

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [ANN] wireless-regdb: master-2013-10-11

Am 20.11.2013 17:47, schrieb John W. Linville:
>> Sorry, I dropped the ball after I couldn't replicate the problem
>> locally. Does anyone have a suggestion as to what the issue might be?
>
> Hmmm...actually, I may have accidentally regeneratd a key. I'm not
> sure why this didn't seem to cause a problem for me...
>
> Can someone try to verify the signature on the attached regulatory.bin file?

Works fine here.



Attachments:
signature.asc (901.00 B)
OpenPGP digital signature