2015-09-29 15:33:28

by PaX Team

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: question about potential integer truncation in mwifiex_set_wapi_ie and mwifiex_set_wps_ie

hi all,

in drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/sta_ioctl.c the following functions

mwifiex_set_wpa_ie_helper
mwifiex_set_wapi_ie
mwifiex_set_wps_ie

can truncate the incoming ie_len argument from u16 to u8 when it gets
stored in mwifiex_private.wpa_ie_len, mwifiex_private.wapi_ie_len and
mwifiex_private.wps_ie_len, respectively. based on some light code
reading it seems a length value of 256 is valid (IEEE_MAX_IE_SIZE and
MWIFIEX_MAX_VSIE_LEN seem to limit it) and thus would get truncated
to 0 when stored in those u8 fields. the question is whether this is
intentional or a bug somewhere.

FTR, this issue was detected with the upcoming version of the size overflow
plugin we have in PaX/grsecurity and there're a handful of similar cases in
the tree where potentially unwanted or unnecessary integer truncations occur,
this being one of these. any opinion/help is welcome!

cheers,
PaX Team



2015-09-30 15:14:12

by PaX Team

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: question about potential integer truncation in mwifiex_set_wapi_ie and mwifiex_set_wps_ie

On 30 Sep 2015 at 9:10, James Cameron wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 05:21:28PM +0200, PaX Team wrote:
> > hi all,
> >
> > in drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/sta_ioctl.c the following functions
> >
> > mwifiex_set_wpa_ie_helper
> > mwifiex_set_wapi_ie
> > mwifiex_set_wps_ie
> >
> > can truncate the incoming ie_len argument from u16 to u8 when it gets
> > stored in mwifiex_private.wpa_ie_len, mwifiex_private.wapi_ie_len and
> > mwifiex_private.wps_ie_len, respectively. based on some light code
> > reading it seems a length value of 256 is valid (IEEE_MAX_IE_SIZE and
> > MWIFIEX_MAX_VSIE_LEN seem to limit it) and thus would get truncated
> > to 0 when stored in those u8 fields. the question is whether this is
> > intentional or a bug somewhere.
>
> i agree, while there is a test to ensure ie_len is not greater than
> 256, there is a possibility that it will be exactly 256, which means
> 256 bytes will be given to memcpy but
> mwifiex_private.{wpa,wapi,wps}_ie_len will be zero.
>
> i suggest changing the lengths to u16. not tested.

while this is probably a necessary first step you'll also have to verify
all loads from these fields for integer truncation that can occur now
(the stores were checked by the plugin i mentioned above). based on a
naive grep the code seems to be fine but someone with actual knowledge
of the code had better verify it ;).

> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/main.h b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/main.h
> index fe12560..b66e9a7 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/main.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/main.h
> @@ -512,14 +512,14 @@ struct mwifiex_private {
> struct mwifiex_wep_key wep_key[NUM_WEP_KEYS];
> u16 wep_key_curr_index;
> u8 wpa_ie[256];
> - u8 wpa_ie_len;
> + u16 wpa_ie_len;
> u8 wpa_is_gtk_set;
> struct host_cmd_ds_802_11_key_material aes_key;
> struct host_cmd_ds_802_11_key_material_v2 aes_key_v2;
> u8 wapi_ie[256];
> - u8 wapi_ie_len;
> + u16 wapi_ie_len;
> u8 *wps_ie;
> - u8 wps_ie_len;
> + u16 wps_ie_len;
> u8 wmm_required;
> u8 wmm_enabled;
> u8 wmm_qosinfo;
>
> --
> James Cameron
> http://quozl.linux.org.au/
>




2015-09-29 23:11:01

by James Cameron

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: question about potential integer truncation in mwifiex_set_wapi_ie and mwifiex_set_wps_ie

On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 05:21:28PM +0200, PaX Team wrote:
> hi all,
>
> in drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/sta_ioctl.c the following functions
>
> mwifiex_set_wpa_ie_helper
> mwifiex_set_wapi_ie
> mwifiex_set_wps_ie
>
> can truncate the incoming ie_len argument from u16 to u8 when it gets
> stored in mwifiex_private.wpa_ie_len, mwifiex_private.wapi_ie_len and
> mwifiex_private.wps_ie_len, respectively. based on some light code
> reading it seems a length value of 256 is valid (IEEE_MAX_IE_SIZE and
> MWIFIEX_MAX_VSIE_LEN seem to limit it) and thus would get truncated
> to 0 when stored in those u8 fields. the question is whether this is
> intentional or a bug somewhere.

i agree, while there is a test to ensure ie_len is not greater than
256, there is a possibility that it will be exactly 256, which means
256 bytes will be given to memcpy but
mwifiex_private.{wpa,wapi,wps}_ie_len will be zero.

i suggest changing the lengths to u16. not tested.

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/main.h b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/main.h
index fe12560..b66e9a7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/main.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/main.h
@@ -512,14 +512,14 @@ struct mwifiex_private {
struct mwifiex_wep_key wep_key[NUM_WEP_KEYS];
u16 wep_key_curr_index;
u8 wpa_ie[256];
- u8 wpa_ie_len;
+ u16 wpa_ie_len;
u8 wpa_is_gtk_set;
struct host_cmd_ds_802_11_key_material aes_key;
struct host_cmd_ds_802_11_key_material_v2 aes_key_v2;
u8 wapi_ie[256];
- u8 wapi_ie_len;
+ u16 wapi_ie_len;
u8 *wps_ie;
- u8 wps_ie_len;
+ u16 wps_ie_len;
u8 wmm_required;
u8 wmm_enabled;
u8 wmm_qosinfo;

--
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/

2015-10-09 12:05:35

by Amitkumar Karwar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: question about potential integer truncation in mwifiex_set_wapi_ie and mwifiex_set_wps_ie

Hi James/PaX Team,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 4:41 AM
> To: PaX Team
> Cc: Amitkumar Karwar; Avinash Patil; Kalle Valo; linux-
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]
> Subject: Re: question about potential integer truncation in
> mwifiex_set_wapi_ie and mwifiex_set_wps_ie
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 05:21:28PM +0200, PaX Team wrote:
> > hi all,
> >
> > in drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/sta_ioctl.c the following functions
> >
> > mwifiex_set_wpa_ie_helper
> > mwifiex_set_wapi_ie
> > mwifiex_set_wps_ie
> >
> > can truncate the incoming ie_len argument from u16 to u8 when it gets
> > stored in mwifiex_private.wpa_ie_len, mwifiex_private.wapi_ie_len and
> > mwifiex_private.wps_ie_len, respectively. based on some light code
> > reading it seems a length value of 256 is valid (IEEE_MAX_IE_SIZE and
> > MWIFIEX_MAX_VSIE_LEN seem to limit it) and thus would get truncated to
> > 0 when stored in those u8 fields. the question is whether this is
> > intentional or a bug somewhere.
>
> i agree, while there is a test to ensure ie_len is not greater than 256,
> there is a possibility that it will be exactly 256, which means
> 256 bytes will be given to memcpy but
> mwifiex_private.{wpa,wapi,wps}_ie_len will be zero.
>
> i suggest changing the lengths to u16. not tested.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/main.h
> b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/main.h
> index fe12560..b66e9a7 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/main.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/main.h
> @@ -512,14 +512,14 @@ struct mwifiex_private {
> struct mwifiex_wep_key wep_key[NUM_WEP_KEYS];
> u16 wep_key_curr_index;
> u8 wpa_ie[256];
> - u8 wpa_ie_len;
> + u16 wpa_ie_len;
> u8 wpa_is_gtk_set;
> struct host_cmd_ds_802_11_key_material aes_key;
> struct host_cmd_ds_802_11_key_material_v2 aes_key_v2;
> u8 wapi_ie[256];
> - u8 wapi_ie_len;
> + u16 wapi_ie_len;
> u8 *wps_ie;
> - u8 wps_ie_len;
> + u16 wps_ie_len;
> u8 wmm_required;
> u8 wmm_enabled;
> u8 wmm_qosinfo;
>

This change makes sense. Also, we should not typecast the length to v8 while copying to mwifiex_private variable.

./sta_ioctl.c:761: priv->wpa_ie_len = (u8) ie_len;

Eventually the length stored in 'wapi_ie_len' is copied to a u16 variable.

/join.c:304: ie_header.len = cpu_to_le16(priv->wapi_ie_len);

I will submit a patch to fix this.

Regards,
Amitkumar