2015-08-11 13:30:19

by Xose Vazquez Perez

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] wireless-regdb: add 2.4GHz regulatory rules for Cuba (CU)

Resolución 127, 2011 - Reglamento Banda 2,4 GHz.:
http://www.mincom.gob.cu/sites/default/files/marcoregulatorio/R%20127-11%20Reglamento%20banda%202,4%20GHz.pdf

Cc: Seth Forshee <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Xose Vazquez Perez <[email protected]>
---
db.txt | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/db.txt b/db.txt
index 982db34..2edbf90 100644
--- a/db.txt
+++ b/db.txt
@@ -275,6 +275,13 @@ country CR: DFS-FCC
(5490 - 5730 @ 20), (24), DFS
(5735 - 5835 @ 20), (30)

+# http://www.mincom.gob.cu/?q=marcoregulatorio
+# - Redes Informáticas
+# Resolución 127, 2011 - Reglamento Banda 2,4 GHz.
+country CU: DFS-FCC
+ (2400 - 2456 @ 40), (200 mW)
+ (2456 - 2483.5 @ 40), (200 mW)
+
country CX: DFS-FCC
(2402 - 2482 @ 40), (20)
(5170 - 5250 @ 80), (24), AUTO-BW
--
2.4.3


2015-08-13 14:32:15

by Seth Forshee

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wireless-regdb: add 2.4GHz regulatory rules for Cuba (CU)

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 03:29:55PM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> Resolución 127, 2011 - Reglamento Banda 2,4 GHz.:
> http://www.mincom.gob.cu/sites/default/files/marcoregulatorio/R%20127-11%20Reglamento%20banda%202,4%20GHz.pdf
>
> Cc: Seth Forshee <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Signed-off-by: Xose Vazquez Perez <[email protected]>
> ---
> db.txt | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/db.txt b/db.txt
> index 982db34..2edbf90 100644
> --- a/db.txt
> +++ b/db.txt
> @@ -275,6 +275,13 @@ country CR: DFS-FCC
> (5490 - 5730 @ 20), (24), DFS
> (5735 - 5835 @ 20), (30)
>
> +# http://www.mincom.gob.cu/?q=marcoregulatorio
> +# - Redes Informáticas
> +# Resolución 127, 2011 - Reglamento Banda 2,4 GHz.
> +country CU: DFS-FCC
> + (2400 - 2456 @ 40), (200 mW)
> + (2456 - 2483.5 @ 40), (200 mW)
> +

Based on the Google translation of the document you linked to, I don't
see anything which would prevent merging these rules into one rule. Am I
missing something?

Thanks,
Seth

2015-09-08 13:59:44

by Xose Vazquez Perez

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wireless-regdb: add 2.4GHz regulatory rules for Cuba (CU)

On 08/13/2015 04:31 PM, Seth Forshee wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 03:29:55PM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
>> Resolución 127, 2011 - Reglamento Banda 2,4 GHz.:
>> http://www.mincom.gob.cu/sites/default/files/marcoregulatorio/R%20127-11%20Reglamento%20banda%202,4%20GHz.pdf
>>
>> Cc: Seth Forshee <[email protected]>
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Signed-off-by: Xose Vazquez Perez <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> db.txt | 7 +++++++
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/db.txt b/db.txt
>> index 982db34..2edbf90 100644
>> --- a/db.txt
>> +++ b/db.txt
>> @@ -275,6 +275,13 @@ country CR: DFS-FCC
>> (5490 - 5730 @ 20), (24), DFS
>> (5735 - 5835 @ 20), (30)
>>
>> +# http://www.mincom.gob.cu/?q=marcoregulatorio
>> +# - Redes Informáticas
>> +# Resolución 127, 2011 - Reglamento Banda 2,4 GHz.
>> +country CU: DFS-FCC
>> + (2400 - 2456 @ 40), (200 mW)
>> + (2456 - 2483.5 @ 40), (200 mW)
>> +
>
> Based on the Google translation of the document you linked to, I don't
> see anything which would prevent merging these rules into one rule. Am I
> missing something?

from http://www.mincom.gob.cu/sites/default/files/marcoregulatorio/R%20127-11%20Reglamento%20banda%202,4%20GHz.pdf
page 7:

Artículo 4: Disposiciones de carácter técnico
[..]
4.3.- No obstante lo anterior, los equipos que operen en las frecuencias entre 2456 y
2483,5 MHz pueden emplear valores de p.i.r.e superiores, cuando ello se justifique en
beneficio de objetivos de interés nacional [...]
4.4.- Para estos casos es necesario obtener una autorización expresa de la Agencia
[...]

If you grant an authorization, for 2456-2483.5 pire can be increased.


2015-09-08 14:22:24

by Seth Forshee

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wireless-regdb: add 2.4GHz regulatory rules for Cuba (CU)

On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 03:59:38PM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> On 08/13/2015 04:31 PM, Seth Forshee wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 03:29:55PM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> >> Resolución 127, 2011 - Reglamento Banda 2,4 GHz.:
> >> http://www.mincom.gob.cu/sites/default/files/marcoregulatorio/R%20127-11%20Reglamento%20banda%202,4%20GHz.pdf
> >>
> >> Cc: Seth Forshee <[email protected]>
> >> Cc: [email protected]
> >> Cc: [email protected]
> >> Signed-off-by: Xose Vazquez Perez <[email protected]>
> >> ---
> >> db.txt | 7 +++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/db.txt b/db.txt
> >> index 982db34..2edbf90 100644
> >> --- a/db.txt
> >> +++ b/db.txt
> >> @@ -275,6 +275,13 @@ country CR: DFS-FCC
> >> (5490 - 5730 @ 20), (24), DFS
> >> (5735 - 5835 @ 20), (30)
> >>
> >> +# http://www.mincom.gob.cu/?q=marcoregulatorio
> >> +# - Redes Informáticas
> >> +# Resolución 127, 2011 - Reglamento Banda 2,4 GHz.
> >> +country CU: DFS-FCC
> >> + (2400 - 2456 @ 40), (200 mW)
> >> + (2456 - 2483.5 @ 40), (200 mW)
> >> +
> >
> > Based on the Google translation of the document you linked to, I don't
> > see anything which would prevent merging these rules into one rule. Am I
> > missing something?
>
> from http://www.mincom.gob.cu/sites/default/files/marcoregulatorio/R%20127-11%20Reglamento%20banda%202,4%20GHz.pdf
> page 7:
>
> Artículo 4: Disposiciones de carácter técnico
> [..]
> 4.3.- No obstante lo anterior, los equipos que operen en las frecuencias entre 2456 y
> 2483,5 MHz pueden emplear valores de p.i.r.e superiores, cuando ello se justifique en
> beneficio de objetivos de interés nacional [...]
> 4.4.- Para estos casos es necesario obtener una autorización expresa de la Agencia
> [...]
>
> If you grant an authorization, for 2456-2483.5 pire can be increased.

Okay, but for the purposes of this database that provision isn't going
to apply, and it seems you agree since you've listed both as having the
exact same power limit. So I'd still prefer that we make it a single
rule.

Thanks,
Seth

2016-01-27 09:58:02

by Xose Vazquez Perez

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wireless-regdb: add 2.4GHz regulatory rules for Cuba (CU)

On 09/08/2015 04:22 PM, Seth Forshee wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 03:59:38PM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
>> On 08/13/2015 04:31 PM, Seth Forshee wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 03:29:55PM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
>>>> Resolución 127, 2011 - Reglamento Banda 2,4 GHz.:
>>>> http://www.mincom.gob.cu/sites/default/files/marcoregulatorio/R%20127-11%20Reglamento%20banda%202,4%20GHz.pdf
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Seth Forshee <[email protected]>
>>>> Cc: [email protected]
>>>> Cc: [email protected]
>>>> Signed-off-by: Xose Vazquez Perez <[email protected]>
>>>> ---
>>>> db.txt | 7 +++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/db.txt b/db.txt
>>>> index 982db34..2edbf90 100644
>>>> --- a/db.txt
>>>> +++ b/db.txt
>>>> @@ -275,6 +275,13 @@ country CR: DFS-FCC
>>>> (5490 - 5730 @ 20), (24), DFS
>>>> (5735 - 5835 @ 20), (30)
>>>>
>>>> +# http://www.mincom.gob.cu/?q=marcoregulatorio
>>>> +# - Redes Informáticas
>>>> +# Resolución 127, 2011 - Reglamento Banda 2,4 GHz.
>>>> +country CU: DFS-FCC
>>>> + (2400 - 2456 @ 40), (200 mW)
>>>> + (2456 - 2483.5 @ 40), (200 mW)
>>>> +
>>>
>>> Based on the Google translation of the document you linked to, I don't
>>> see anything which would prevent merging these rules into one rule. Am I
>>> missing something?
>>
>> from http://www.mincom.gob.cu/sites/default/files/marcoregulatorio/R%20127-11%20Reglamento%20banda%202,4%20GHz.pdf
>> page 7:
>>
>> Artículo 4: Disposiciones de carácter técnico
>> [..]
>> 4.3.- No obstante lo anterior, los equipos que operen en las frecuencias entre 2456 y
>> 2483,5 MHz pueden emplear valores de p.i.r.e superiores, cuando ello se justifique en
>> beneficio de objetivos de interés nacional [...]
>> 4.4.- Para estos casos es necesario obtener una autorización expresa de la Agencia
>> [...]
>>
>> If you grant an authorization, for 2456-2483.5 pire can be increased.
>
> Okay, but for the purposes of this database that provision isn't going
> to apply, and it seems you agree since you've listed both as having the
> exact same power limit. So I'd still prefer that we make it a single
> rule.

OK. Done in v2.

-thanks-