match_string() returns the index of an array for a matching string,
which can be used intead of open coded variant.
Cc: Kalle Valo <[email protected]>
Cc: Intel Linux Wireless <[email protected]>
Cc: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
Cc: Emmanuel Grumbach <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Yisheng Xie <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/debugfs.c | 11 +++--------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/debugfs.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/debugfs.c
index 0e6401c..e8249a6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/debugfs.c
@@ -671,14 +671,9 @@ static ssize_t iwl_dbgfs_bt_cmd_read(struct file *file, char __user *user_buf,
};
int ret, bt_force_ant_mode;
- for (bt_force_ant_mode = 0;
- bt_force_ant_mode < ARRAY_SIZE(modes_str);
- bt_force_ant_mode++) {
- if (!strcmp(buf, modes_str[bt_force_ant_mode]))
- break;
- }
-
- if (bt_force_ant_mode >= ARRAY_SIZE(modes_str))
+ bt_force_ant_mode = match_string(modes_str,
+ ARRAY_SIZE(modes_str), buf);
+ if (bt_force_ant_mode < 0)
return -EINVAL;
ret = 0;
--
1.7.12.4
On Mon, 2018-05-21 at 19:57 +0800, Yisheng Xie wrote:
> match_string() returns the index of an array for a matching string,
> which can be used intead of open coded variant.
>
> Cc: Kalle Valo <[email protected]>
> Cc: Intel Linux Wireless <[email protected]>
> Cc: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
> Cc: Emmanuel Grumbach <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Signed-off-by: Yisheng Xie <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/debugfs.c | 11 +++--------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/debugfs.c
> b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/debugfs.c
> index 0e6401c..e8249a6 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/debugfs.c
> @@ -671,14 +671,9 @@ static ssize_t iwl_dbgfs_bt_cmd_read(struct file
> *file, char __user *user_buf,
> };
> int ret, bt_force_ant_mode;
>
> - for (bt_force_ant_mode = 0;
> - bt_force_ant_mode < ARRAY_SIZE(modes_str);
> - bt_force_ant_mode++) {
> - if (!strcmp(buf, modes_str[bt_force_ant_mode]))
> - break;
> - }
> -
> - if (bt_force_ant_mode >= ARRAY_SIZE(modes_str))
> + bt_force_ant_mode = match_string(modes_str,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(modes_str),
> buf);
> + if (bt_force_ant_mode < 0)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> ret = 0;
Looks fine, I'll push this to our internal tree for review and take a
closer look at what the match_string() function does exactly.
Thanks for the patch.
--
Cheers,
Luca.
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 2:57 PM, Yisheng Xie <[email protected]> wrote:
> match_string() returns the index of an array for a matching string,
> which can be used intead of open coded variant.
> int ret, bt_force_ant_mode;
>
> - for (bt_force_ant_mode = 0;
> - bt_force_ant_mode < ARRAY_SIZE(modes_str);
> - bt_force_ant_mode++) {
> - if (!strcmp(buf, modes_str[bt_force_ant_mode]))
> - break;
> - }
> -
> - if (bt_force_ant_mode >= ARRAY_SIZE(modes_str))
> + bt_force_ant_mode = match_string(modes_str,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(modes_str), buf);
One line?
> + if (bt_force_ant_mode < 0)
> return -EINVAL;
I would rather use
ret = match_string();
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
bt_force_... = ret;
But it's up tu Loca.
>
> ret = 0;
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Hi Andy,
On 2018/5/22 5:43, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 2:57 PM, Yisheng Xie <[email protected]> wrote:
>> match_string() returns the index of an array for a matching string,
>> which can be used intead of open coded variant.
>
>> int ret, bt_force_ant_mode;
>>
>> - for (bt_force_ant_mode = 0;
>> - bt_force_ant_mode < ARRAY_SIZE(modes_str);
>> - bt_force_ant_mode++) {
>> - if (!strcmp(buf, modes_str[bt_force_ant_mode]))
>> - break;
>> - }
>> -
>> - if (bt_force_ant_mode >= ARRAY_SIZE(modes_str))
>
>> + bt_force_ant_mode = match_string(modes_str,
>> + ARRAY_SIZE(modes_str), buf);
>
> One line?
hmm, if use ret instead it will no over 80 chars.
>
>> + if (bt_force_ant_mode < 0)
>> return -EINVAL;
>
> I would rather use
>
> ret = match_string();
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
>
> bt_force_... = ret;
>
> But it's up tu Loca.
OK, I will change it if Loca agree your opinion.
Thanks
Yisheng
>
>>
>> ret = 0;
>
>
>
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 6:30 AM, Yisheng Xie <[email protected]> wrote:
>> But it's up tu Loca.
Shame on me. I meant Luca, of course!
Luca, sorry.
> OK, I will change it if Loca agree your opinion.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko