2022-10-20 01:51:21

by Dokyung Song

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] brcmfmac: Fixes potential buffer overflow in 'brcmf_fweh_event_worker'

This patch fixes an intra-object buffer overflow in brcmfmac that occurs
when the device provides a 'bsscfgidx' equal to or greater than the
buffer size. The patch adds a check that leads to a safe failure if that
is the case.

Found by a modified version of syzkaller.

UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fweh.c
index 52 is out of range for type 'brcmf_if *[16]'
CPU: 0 PID: 1898 Comm: kworker/0:2 Tainted: G O 5.14.0+ #132
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.1-0-ga5cab58e9a3f-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
Workqueue: events brcmf_fweh_event_worker
Call Trace:
dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x7d
ubsan_epilogue+0x5/0x40
__ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0x69/0x80
? memcpy+0x39/0x60
brcmf_fweh_event_worker+0xae1/0xc00
? brcmf_fweh_call_event_handler.isra.0+0x100/0x100
? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xa1/0xd0
? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xb0/0xb0
? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x273/0x3e0
process_one_work+0x873/0x13e0
? lock_release+0x640/0x640
? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x320/0x320
? rwlock_bug.part.0+0x90/0x90
worker_thread+0x8b/0xd10
? __kthread_parkme+0xd9/0x1d0
? process_one_work+0x13e0/0x13e0
kthread+0x379/0x450
? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x30
? set_kthread_struct+0x100/0x100
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
================================================================================
general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xe5601c0020023fff: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN
KASAN: maybe wild-memory-access in range [0x2b0100010011fff8-0x2b0100010011ffff]
CPU: 0 PID: 1898 Comm: kworker/0:2 Tainted: G O 5.14.0+ #132
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.1-0-ga5cab58e9a3f-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
Workqueue: events brcmf_fweh_event_worker
RIP: 0010:brcmf_fweh_call_event_handler.isra.0+0x42/0x100
Code: 89 f5 53 48 89 fb 48 83 ec 08 e8 79 0b 38 fe 48 85 ed 74 7e e8 6f 0b 38 fe 48 89 ea 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 48 c1 ea 03 <80> 3c 02 00 0f 85 8b 00 00 00 4c 8b 7d 00 44 89 e0 48 ba 00 00 00
RSP: 0018:ffffc9000259fbd8 EFLAGS: 00010207
RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: ffff888115d8cd50 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0560200020023fff RSI: ffffffff8304bc91 RDI: ffff888115d8cd50
RBP: 2b0100010011ffff R08: ffff888112340050 R09: ffffed1023549809
R10: ffff88811aa4c047 R11: ffffed1023549808 R12: 0000000000000045
R13: ffffc9000259fca0 R14: ffff888112340050 R15: ffff888112340000
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88811aa00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 000000004053ccc0 CR3: 0000000112740000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
PKRU: 55555554
Call Trace:
brcmf_fweh_event_worker+0x117/0xc00
? brcmf_fweh_call_event_handler.isra.0+0x100/0x100
? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xa1/0xd0
? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xb0/0xb0
? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x273/0x3e0
process_one_work+0x873/0x13e0
? lock_release+0x640/0x640
? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x320/0x320
? rwlock_bug.part.0+0x90/0x90
worker_thread+0x8b/0xd10
? __kthread_parkme+0xd9/0x1d0
? process_one_work+0x13e0/0x13e0
kthread+0x379/0x450
? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x30
? set_kthread_struct+0x100/0x100
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
Modules linked in: 88XXau(O) 88x2bu(O)
---[ end trace 41d302138f3ff55a ]---
RIP: 0010:brcmf_fweh_call_event_handler.isra.0+0x42/0x100
Code: 89 f5 53 48 89 fb 48 83 ec 08 e8 79 0b 38 fe 48 85 ed 74 7e e8 6f 0b 38 fe 48 89 ea 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 48 c1 ea 03 <80> 3c 02 00 0f 85 8b 00 00 00 4c 8b 7d 00 44 89 e0 48 ba 00 00 00
RSP: 0018:ffffc9000259fbd8 EFLAGS: 00010207
RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: ffff888115d8cd50 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0560200020023fff RSI: ffffffff8304bc91 RDI: ffff888115d8cd50
RBP: 2b0100010011ffff R08: ffff888112340050 R09: ffffed1023549809
R10: ffff88811aa4c047 R11: ffffed1023549808 R12: 0000000000000045
R13: ffffc9000259fca0 R14: ffff888112340050 R15: ffff888112340000
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88811aa00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 000000004053ccc0 CR3: 0000000112740000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
PKRU: 55555554
Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception

Reported-by: Dokyung Song <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Jisoo Jang <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Minsuk Kang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dokyung Song <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fweh.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fweh.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fweh.c
index bc3f4e4edcdf..e035e9c5a1fa 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fweh.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fweh.c
@@ -255,10 +255,15 @@ static void brcmf_fweh_event_worker(struct work_struct *work)
goto event_free;
}

- if (event->code == BRCMF_E_TDLS_PEER_EVENT)
+ if (event->code == BRCMF_E_TDLS_PEER_EVENT) {
ifp = drvr->iflist[0];
- else
+ } else {
+ if (emsg.bsscfgidx >= BRCMF_MAX_IFS) {
+ bphy_err(drvr, "invalid bsscfg index: %u\n", emsg.bsscfgidx);
+ goto event_free;
+ }
ifp = drvr->iflist[emsg.bsscfgidx];
+ }
err = brcmf_fweh_call_event_handler(drvr, ifp, event->code,
&emsg, event->data);
if (err) {
--
2.25.1


2022-10-20 08:43:04

by Arend Van Spriel

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: Fixes potential buffer overflow in 'brcmf_fweh_event_worker'

On 10/20/2022 10:39 AM, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
>> -        else
>> +        } else {
>> +            if (emsg.bsscfgidx >= BRCMF_MAX_IFS) {
>> +                bphy_err(drvr, "invalid bsscfg index: %u\n",
>> emsg.bsscfgidx);
>> +                goto event_free;
>> +            }
>
> probably better to do the validation before any other handling. So right
> after converting the event message at line 245
>
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fweh.c#L245

Actually, if we ignore the event message we can avoid the whole
conversion as well doing the validation before the convert.

Regards,
Arend

2022-10-20 08:43:47

by Arend Van Spriel

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: Fixes potential buffer overflow in 'brcmf_fweh_event_worker'

On 10/20/2022 3:49 AM, Dokyung Song wrote:
> This patch fixes an intra-object buffer overflow in brcmfmac that occurs
> when the device provides a 'bsscfgidx' equal to or greater than the
> buffer size. The patch adds a check that leads to a safe failure if that
> is the case.
>
> Found by a modified version of syzkaller.
>
> UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fweh.c
> index 52 is out of range for type 'brcmf_if *[16]'
> CPU: 0 PID: 1898 Comm: kworker/0:2 Tainted: G O 5.14.0+ #132

[...]

> Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
>
> Reported-by: Dokyung Song <[email protected]>
> Reported-by: Jisoo Jang <[email protected]>
> Reported-by: Minsuk Kang <[email protected]>

Not sure what the rules are for using 'Reported-by' tag, but it looks a
bit odd. I leave it to the wireless maintainer.

Reviewed-by: Arend van Spriel <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Dokyung Song <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fweh.c | 9 +++++++--
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fweh.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fweh.c
> index bc3f4e4edcdf..e035e9c5a1fa 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fweh.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fweh.c
> @@ -255,10 +255,15 @@ static void brcmf_fweh_event_worker(struct work_struct *work)
> goto event_free;
> }
>
> - if (event->code == BRCMF_E_TDLS_PEER_EVENT)
> + if (event->code == BRCMF_E_TDLS_PEER_EVENT) {
> ifp = drvr->iflist[0];
> - else
> + } else {
> + if (emsg.bsscfgidx >= BRCMF_MAX_IFS) {
> + bphy_err(drvr, "invalid bsscfg index: %u\n", emsg.bsscfgidx);
> + goto event_free;
> + }

probably better to do the validation before any other handling. So right
after converting the event message at line 245

https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fweh.c#L245

> ifp = drvr->iflist[emsg.bsscfgidx];
> + }
> err = brcmf_fweh_call_event_handler(drvr, ifp, event->code,
> &emsg, event->data);
> if (err) {