The rtwdev->rf_lock spinlock protects the rf register accesses in
rtw_read_rf() and rtw_write_rf(). Most callers of these functions hold
rtwdev->mutex already with the exception of the callsites in the debugfs
code. The debugfs code doesn't justify an extra lock, so acquire the mutex
there as well before calling rf register accessors and drop the now
unnecessary spinlock.
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/debug.c | 11 +++++++++++
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/hci.h | 9 +++------
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c | 1 -
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.h | 3 ---
4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/debug.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/debug.c
index 9ebe544e51d0d..70e19f2a1a355 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/debug.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/debug.c
@@ -144,7 +144,9 @@ static int rtw_debugfs_get_rf_read(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
addr = debugfs_priv->rf_addr;
mask = debugfs_priv->rf_mask;
+ mutex_lock(&rtwdev->mutex);
val = rtw_read_rf(rtwdev, path, addr, mask);
+ mutex_unlock(&rtwdev->mutex);
seq_printf(m, "rf_read path:%d addr:0x%08x mask:0x%08x val=0x%08x\n",
path, addr, mask, val);
@@ -414,7 +416,9 @@ static ssize_t rtw_debugfs_set_rf_write(struct file *filp,
return count;
}
+ mutex_lock(&rtwdev->mutex);
rtw_write_rf(rtwdev, path, addr, mask, val);
+ mutex_unlock(&rtwdev->mutex);
rtw_dbg(rtwdev, RTW_DBG_DEBUGFS,
"write_rf path:%d addr:0x%08x mask:0x%08x, val:0x%08x\n",
path, addr, mask, val);
@@ -519,6 +523,8 @@ static int rtw_debug_get_rf_dump(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
u32 addr, offset, data;
u8 path;
+ mutex_lock(&rtwdev->mutex);
+
for (path = 0; path < rtwdev->hal.rf_path_num; path++) {
seq_printf(m, "RF path:%d\n", path);
for (addr = 0; addr < 0x100; addr += 4) {
@@ -533,6 +539,8 @@ static int rtw_debug_get_rf_dump(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
seq_puts(m, "\n");
}
+ mutex_unlock(&rtwdev->mutex);
+
return 0;
}
@@ -1026,6 +1034,8 @@ static void dump_gapk_status(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, struct seq_file *m)
dm_info->dm_flags & BIT(RTW_DM_CAP_TXGAPK) ? '-' : '+',
rtw_dm_cap_strs[RTW_DM_CAP_TXGAPK]);
+ mutex_lock(&rtwdev->mutex);
+
for (path = 0; path < rtwdev->hal.rf_path_num; path++) {
val = rtw_read_rf(rtwdev, path, RF_GAINTX, RFREG_MASK);
seq_printf(m, "path %d:\n0x%x = 0x%x\n", path, RF_GAINTX, val);
@@ -1035,6 +1045,7 @@ static void dump_gapk_status(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, struct seq_file *m)
txgapk->rf3f_fs[path][i], i);
seq_puts(m, "\n");
}
+ mutex_unlock(&rtwdev->mutex);
}
static int rtw_debugfs_get_dm_cap(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/hci.h b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/hci.h
index 4c6fc6fb3f83b..830d7532f2a35 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/hci.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/hci.h
@@ -166,12 +166,11 @@ static inline u32
rtw_read_rf(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, enum rtw_rf_path rf_path,
u32 addr, u32 mask)
{
- unsigned long flags;
u32 val;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&rtwdev->rf_lock, flags);
+ lockdep_assert_held(&rtwdev->mutex);
+
val = rtwdev->chip->ops->read_rf(rtwdev, rf_path, addr, mask);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rtwdev->rf_lock, flags);
return val;
}
@@ -180,11 +179,9 @@ static inline void
rtw_write_rf(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, enum rtw_rf_path rf_path,
u32 addr, u32 mask, u32 data)
{
- unsigned long flags;
+ lockdep_assert_held(&rtwdev->mutex);
- spin_lock_irqsave(&rtwdev->rf_lock, flags);
rtwdev->chip->ops->write_rf(rtwdev, rf_path, addr, mask, data);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rtwdev->rf_lock, flags);
}
static inline u32
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c
index a7331872e8530..710ddb0283c82 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c
@@ -2067,7 +2067,6 @@ int rtw_core_init(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev)
skb_queue_head_init(&rtwdev->coex.queue);
skb_queue_head_init(&rtwdev->tx_report.queue);
- spin_lock_init(&rtwdev->rf_lock);
spin_lock_init(&rtwdev->h2c.lock);
spin_lock_init(&rtwdev->txq_lock);
spin_lock_init(&rtwdev->tx_report.q_lock);
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.h b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.h
index 6e5875f6d07f4..f24d17f482aaa 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.h
@@ -1995,9 +1995,6 @@ struct rtw_dev {
/* ensures exclusive access from mac80211 callbacks */
struct mutex mutex;
- /* read/write rf register */
- spinlock_t rf_lock;
-
/* watch dog every 2 sec */
struct delayed_work watch_dog_work;
u32 watch_dog_cnt;
--
2.30.2
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sascha Hauer <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2022 10:52 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Neo Jou <[email protected]>; Hans Ulli Kroll <[email protected]>; Ping-Ke Shih <[email protected]>;
> Yan-Hsuan Chuang <[email protected]>; Kalle Valo <[email protected]>; [email protected];
> [email protected]; Martin Blumenstingl <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]; Johannes Berg <[email protected]>; Alexander Hochbaum <[email protected]>;
> Da Xue <[email protected]>; Bernie Huang <[email protected]>; Viktor Petrenko <[email protected]>;
> Sascha Hauer <[email protected]>
> Subject: [PATCH v3 03/11] rtw88: Drop rf_lock
>
> The rtwdev->rf_lock spinlock protects the rf register accesses in
> rtw_read_rf() and rtw_write_rf(). Most callers of these functions hold
> rtwdev->mutex already with the exception of the callsites in the debugfs
> code. The debugfs code doesn't justify an extra lock, so acquire the mutex
> there as well before calling rf register accessors and drop the now
> unnecessary spinlock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ping-Ke Shih <[email protected]>
[...]