On Wed, 2019-11-27 at 12:41 +0300, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> Commit 6570bc79c0df ("net: core: use listified Rx for GRO_NORMAL in
> napi_gro_receive()") has applied batched GRO_NORMAL packets processing
> to all napi_gro_receive() users, including mac80211-based drivers.
>
> However, this change has led to a regression in iwlwifi driver [1][2] as
> it is required for NAPI users to call napi_complete_done() or
> napi_complete() and the end of every polling iteration, whilst iwlwifi
> doesn't use NAPI scheduling at all and just calls napi_gro_flush().
> In that particular case, packets which have not been already flushed
> from napi->rx_list stall in it until at least next Rx cycle.
>
> Fix this by adding a manual flushing of the list to iwlwifi driver right
> before napi_gro_flush() call to mimic napi_complete() logics.
>
> I prefer to open-code gro_normal_list() rather than exporting it for 2
> reasons:
> * to prevent from using it and napi_gro_flush() in any new drivers,
> as it is the *really* bad way to use NAPI that should be avoided;
> * to keep gro_normal_list() static and don't lose any CC optimizations.
>
> I also don't add the "Fixes:" tag as the mentioned commit was only a
> trigger that only exposed an improper usage of NAPI in this particular
> driver.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/PSXP216MB04388962C411CD0B17A86F47804A0@PSXP216MB0438.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
> [2] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205647
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <[email protected]>
> ---
We don't usually use "net: wireless: intel:" in the commit message, we
would use "iwlwifi: pcie:", but I don't care much.
Otherwise:
Acked-by: Luca Coelho <[email protected]>
Thanks a lot for the fix!
Dave, I'm assuming you'll take this directly into your tree, right?
--
Cheers,
Luca.
Luciano Coelho wrote 27.11.2019 12:58:
> On Wed, 2019-11-27 at 12:41 +0300, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
>> Commit 6570bc79c0df ("net: core: use listified Rx for GRO_NORMAL in
>> napi_gro_receive()") has applied batched GRO_NORMAL packets processing
>> to all napi_gro_receive() users, including mac80211-based drivers.
>>
>> However, this change has led to a regression in iwlwifi driver [1][2]
>> as
>> it is required for NAPI users to call napi_complete_done() or
>> napi_complete() and the end of every polling iteration, whilst iwlwifi
>> doesn't use NAPI scheduling at all and just calls napi_gro_flush().
>> In that particular case, packets which have not been already flushed
>> from napi->rx_list stall in it until at least next Rx cycle.
>>
>> Fix this by adding a manual flushing of the list to iwlwifi driver
>> right
>> before napi_gro_flush() call to mimic napi_complete() logics.
>>
>> I prefer to open-code gro_normal_list() rather than exporting it for 2
>> reasons:
>> * to prevent from using it and napi_gro_flush() in any new drivers,
>> as it is the *really* bad way to use NAPI that should be avoided;
>> * to keep gro_normal_list() static and don't lose any CC
>> optimizations.
>>
>> I also don't add the "Fixes:" tag as the mentioned commit was only a
>> trigger that only exposed an improper usage of NAPI in this particular
>> driver.
>>
>> [1]
>> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/PSXP216MB04388962C411CD0B17A86F47804A0@PSXP216MB0438.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
>> [2] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205647
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <[email protected]>
>> ---
>
> We don't usually use "net: wireless: intel:" in the commit message, we
> would use "iwlwifi: pcie:", but I don't care much.
>
> Otherwise:
>
> Acked-by: Luca Coelho <[email protected]>
Thank you!
> Thanks a lot for the fix!
>
> Dave, I'm assuming you'll take this directly into your tree, right?
Also please let me know if I should send v2 with Ack and fixed commit
subject!
> --
> Cheers,
> Luca.
Regards,
ᚷ ᛖ ᚢ ᚦ ᚠ ᚱ