Currently ftm_responder parameter in hostapd.conf is only used for fine
timing measurement (FTM) capability advertisement and actual control of
the functionality is with low-level device/driver. This leads to confusion
to the user when the capability advertisement is different from actual FTM
responder functionality.
For example, FTM responder capability advertisement is set to 'enabled',
but the functionality is disabled or not supported by the driver.
The patch set allows userspace to enable FTM responder functionality
with the addition of new Netlink flag attribute NL80211_ATTR_FTM_RESPONDER
with configurable lci/civic ocation parameters. Also extended feature flag
is added for the drivers to advertise the support. Setting the flag to
enable FTM responder would imply that AP responds to all FTM requests.
Default is considered to be disabled.
changes in V3:
- fixed the ambiguous ftm responder disable case to be not supported
changes in V2:
- updated version number
- rebased patches
Johannes Berg, Pradeep Kumar Chitrapu (1):
cfg80211: support FTM responder configuration/statistics
David Spinadel, Johannes Berg, Pradeep Kumar Chitrapu (1):
mac80211: support FTM responder configuration/statistics
Pradeep Kumar Chitrapu (1):
ath10k: Add support to configure ftm responder role
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h | 1 +
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c | 29 ++++++++
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c | 4 ++
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.h | 10 +++
include/net/cfg80211.h | 66 ++++++++++++++++++
include/net/mac80211.h | 13 ++++
include/uapi/linux/nl80211.h | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++
net/mac80211/cfg.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++
net/mac80211/driver-ops.h | 16 +++++
net/mac80211/trace.h | 23 ++++++
net/mac80211/util.c | 3 +
net/wireless/nl80211.c | 124 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
net/wireless/rdev-ops.h | 15 ++++
net/wireless/trace.h | 44 ++++++++++++
14 files changed, 508 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--
1.9.1
On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 18:01 -0700, Pradeep Kumar Chitrapu wrote:
> Currently ftm_responder parameter in hostapd.conf is only used for fine
> timing measurement (FTM) capability advertisement and actual control of
> the functionality is with low-level device/driver. This leads to confusion
> to the user when the capability advertisement is different from actual FTM
> responder functionality.
>
> For example, FTM responder capability advertisement is set to 'enabled',
> but the functionality is disabled or not supported by the driver.
>
> The patch set allows userspace to enable FTM responder functionality
> with the addition of new Netlink flag attribute NL80211_ATTR_FTM_RESPONDER
> with configurable lci/civic ocation parameters. Also extended feature flag
> is added for the drivers to advertise the support. Setting the flag to
> enable FTM responder would imply that AP responds to all FTM requests.
> Default is considered to be disabled.
>
> changes in V3:
> - fixed the ambiguous ftm responder disable case to be not supported
For reasons unknown to me, this patchset made it neither to the list
nor, consequently, patchwork. Please resend.
johannes
Johannes Berg <[email protected]> writes:
> On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 18:01 -0700, Pradeep Kumar Chitrapu wrote:
>> Currently ftm_responder parameter in hostapd.conf is only used for fine
>> timing measurement (FTM) capability advertisement and actual control of
>> the functionality is with low-level device/driver. This leads to confusion
>> to the user when the capability advertisement is different from actual FTM
>> responder functionality.
>>
>> For example, FTM responder capability advertisement is set to 'enabled',
>> but the functionality is disabled or not supported by the driver.
>>
>> The patch set allows userspace to enable FTM responder functionality
>> with the addition of new Netlink flag attribute NL80211_ATTR_FTM_RESPONDER
>> with configurable lci/civic ocation parameters. Also extended feature flag
>> is added for the drivers to advertise the support. Setting the flag to
>> enable FTM responder would imply that AP responds to all FTM requests.
>> Default is considered to be disabled.
>>
>> changes in V3:
>> - fixed the ambiguous ftm responder disable case to be not supported
>
> For reasons unknown to me, this patchset made it neither to the list
> nor, consequently, patchwork. Please resend.
Actually patch 3 made it:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10590115/
But it didn't get the rest as it says "Untitled series #15763".
Patchwork was timing out for me quite heavily so in that way I'm not
surprised that patches are getting lost :(
--
Kalle Valo
Johannes Berg <[email protected]> writes:
> On Thu, 2018-09-06 at 18:15 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
>>
>> Actually patch 3 made it:
>>
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10590115/
>>
>> But it didn't get the rest as it says "Untitled series #15763".
>> Patchwork was timing out for me quite heavily so in that way I'm not
>> surprised that patches are getting lost :(
>
> No, it's not patchwork - I didn't get the patches (except for #3) via
> the list either.
Ah, missed that as the ath10k list did get all the patches. But very
good that patchwork was not to blame here.
--
Kalle Valo
On Thu, 2018-09-06 at 18:15 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
>
> Actually patch 3 made it:
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10590115/
>
> But it didn't get the rest as it says "Untitled series #15763".
> Patchwork was timing out for me quite heavily so in that way I'm not
> surprised that patches are getting lost :(
No, it's not patchwork - I didn't get the patches (except for #3) via
the list either.
johannes
On 9/6/2018 9:58 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> I'm not sure what you're doing, but this time only the cover letter made
> it to the list, afaict.
>
> maybe try to resend from somewhere else?
I guess you are using 'git send-email' so you could use --dry-run and
check if every message would be send to the linux-wireless list. If it
is your MTA is probably misconfigured.
Regards,
Arend