Remove black line suggested by Sergei
This patch is to the ath5k/eeprom.c that fixes up warning caught by
coccicheck:
Unneeded variable: "ret". Return "0" on line 980
Remove unneeded variable ret created to return zero.
Signed-off-by: Punit Vara <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/wcn36xx/main.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wcn36xx/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wcn36xx/main.c
index 900e72a..94bcc08 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wcn36xx/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wcn36xx/main.c
@@ -935,8 +935,6 @@ static const struct ieee80211_ops wcn36xx_ops = {
static int wcn36xx_init_ieee80211(struct wcn36xx *wcn)
{
- int ret = 0;
-
static const u32 cipher_suites[] = {
WLAN_CIPHER_SUITE_WEP40,
WLAN_CIPHER_SUITE_WEP104,
@@ -977,7 +975,7 @@ static int wcn36xx_init_ieee80211(struct wcn36xx *wcn)
wcn->hw->sta_data_size = sizeof(struct wcn36xx_sta);
wcn->hw->vif_data_size = sizeof(struct wcn36xx_vif);
- return ret;
+ return 0;
}
static int wcn36xx_platform_get_resources(struct wcn36xx *wcn,
--
2.5.3
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 12:26 AM, Sergei Shtylyov
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On 10/22/2015 09:47 PM, Punit Vara wrote:
>
>> Remove black line suggested by Sergei
>
>
> Such kind of comments should be under the --- tear line.
>
>>
>> This patch is to the ath5k/eeprom.c that fixes up warning caught by
>> coccicheck:
>>
>> Unneeded variable: "ret". Return "0" on line 980
>>
>> Remove unneeded variable ret created to return zero.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Punit Vara <[email protected]>
>
> [...]
>
> MBR, Sergei
>
Thanks you Sergei for review.
Actually I didnt know You have replied to this mail because this was
gone in some other folder of my mail box .. I will send this patch
again as you suggested . Will my other patches which are already
correct be added to wireless tree ? or I have to resend everything ?
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Kalle Valo <[email protected]> wrote:
> punit vara <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> Will my other patches which are already correct be added to wireless
>> tree ? or I have to resend everything ?
>
> Yes, please resend the whole patchset. I don't apply patches
> individually from a patchset, it's just too time consuming and error
> prone.
>
> Also, as you seem to be new here, I don't recommend sending big
> patchsets in the beginning. Start slow, send just few a patch or two at
> a time, and once you gain more experience send bigger patchsets.
>
> --
> Kalle Valo
Next time I will send 2-3 patches only . This time I have resent you
all the patches that I have created before . Thank you for suggestion.
punit vara <[email protected]> writes:
> Will my other patches which are already correct be added to wireless
> tree ? or I have to resend everything ?
Yes, please resend the whole patchset. I don't apply patches
individually from a patchset, it's just too time consuming and error
prone.
Also, as you seem to be new here, I don't recommend sending big
patchsets in the beginning. Start slow, send just few a patch or two at
a time, and once you gain more experience send bigger patchsets.
--
Kalle Valo
On 10/22/2015 09:47 PM, Punit Vara wrote:
> Remove black line suggested by Sergei
Such kind of comments should be under the --- tear line.
>
> This patch is to the ath5k/eeprom.c that fixes up warning caught by
> coccicheck:
>
> Unneeded variable: "ret". Return "0" on line 980
>
> Remove unneeded variable ret created to return zero.
>
> Signed-off-by: Punit Vara <[email protected]>
[...]
MBR, Sergei