2017-11-02 11:09:45

by Arnd Bergmann

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] ath10k: move pci suspend/resume functions

The combination of two patches has led to a build failure:

drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c: In function 'ath10k_pci_pm_suspend':
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c:3416:8: error: implicit declaration of function 'ath10k_pci_suspend'; did you mean 'ath10k_pci_pm_suspend'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c: In function 'ath10k_pci_pm_resume':
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c:3428:8: error: implicit declaration of function 'ath10k_pci_resume'; did you mean 'ath10k_pci_pm_resume'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

This moves the functions outside of the now incorrect #ifdef.

Fixes: 96378bd2c6cd ("ath10k: fix core PCI suspend when WoWLAN is supported but disabled")
Fixes: 6af1de2e4ec4 ("ath10k: mark PM functions as __maybe_unused")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c
index b18a9b690df4..6513edbd86e6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c
@@ -2585,6 +2585,13 @@ static int ath10k_pci_hif_suspend(struct ath10k *ar)
return 0;
}

+static int ath10k_pci_hif_resume(struct ath10k *ar)
+{
+ /* Nothing to do; the important stuff is in the driver resume. */
+ return 0;
+}
+#endif
+
static int ath10k_pci_suspend(struct ath10k *ar)
{
/* The grace timer can still be counting down and ar->ps_awake be true.
@@ -2597,12 +2604,6 @@ static int ath10k_pci_suspend(struct ath10k *ar)
return 0;
}

-static int ath10k_pci_hif_resume(struct ath10k *ar)
-{
- /* Nothing to do; the important stuff is in the driver resume. */
- return 0;
-}
-
static int ath10k_pci_resume(struct ath10k *ar)
{
struct ath10k_pci *ar_pci = ath10k_pci_priv(ar);
@@ -2627,7 +2628,6 @@ static int ath10k_pci_resume(struct ath10k *ar)

return ret;
}
-#endif

static bool ath10k_pci_validate_cal(void *data, size_t size)
{
--
2.9.0


2017-11-02 15:40:58

by Arnd Bergmann

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: move pci suspend/resume functions

On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 4:23 PM, Kalle Valo <[email protected]> wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> The combination of two patches has led to a build failure:
>>
>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c: In function 'ath10k_pci_pm_suspend':
>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c:3416:8: error: implicit declaration of function 'ath10k_pci_suspend'; did you mean 'ath10k_pci_pm_suspend'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c: In function 'ath10k_pci_pm_resume':
>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c:3428:8: error: implicit declaration of function 'ath10k_pci_resume'; did you mean 'ath10k_pci_pm_resume'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>
>> This moves the functions outside of the now incorrect #ifdef.
>>
>> Fixes: 96378bd2c6cd ("ath10k: fix core PCI suspend when WoWLAN is supported but disabled")
>> Fixes: 6af1de2e4ec4 ("ath10k: mark PM functions as __maybe_unused")
>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
>
> Brian has already fixed this, please check that:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/ath.git/commit/?h=ath-next&id=20665a9076d48e9abd9a2db13d307f58f7ef6647
>
> But apparently I forgot to merge ath-next to wireless-drivers-next, will
> do that soon.

Yes, Brian's version is better. I considered the same, but wasn't sure
it was safe.

Arnd

2017-11-02 17:10:23

by Brian Norris

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: move pci suspend/resume functions

On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 04:40:57PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 4:23 PM, Kalle Valo <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Brian has already fixed this, please check that:
> >
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/ath.git/commit/?h=ath-next&id=20665a9076d48e9abd9a2db13d307f58f7ef6647
> >
> > But apparently I forgot to merge ath-next to wireless-drivers-next, will
> > do that soon.
>
> Yes, Brian's version is better. I considered the same, but wasn't sure
> it was safe.

Yes, it's safe. The code is still basically dead, since the mac80211 ops
get dropped with !CONFIG_PM (so no one calls the
*_hif_{suspend,resume}() functions), but at least we have fewer
#ifdef's.

Brian

2017-11-02 15:23:45

by Kalle Valo

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: move pci suspend/resume functions

Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> writes:

> The combination of two patches has led to a build failure:
>
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c: In function 'ath10k_pci_pm_suspend=
':
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c:3416:8: error: implicit declaration=
of function 'ath10k_pci_suspend'; did you mean 'ath10k_pci_pm_suspend'? [-=
Werror=3Dimplicit-function-declaration]
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c: In function 'ath10k_pci_pm_resume'=
:
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c:3428:8: error: implicit declaration=
of function 'ath10k_pci_resume'; did you mean 'ath10k_pci_pm_resume'? [-We=
rror=3Dimplicit-function-declaration]
>
> This moves the functions outside of the now incorrect #ifdef.
>
> Fixes: 96378bd2c6cd ("ath10k: fix core PCI suspend when WoWLAN is support=
ed but disabled")
> Fixes: 6af1de2e4ec4 ("ath10k: mark PM functions as __maybe_unused")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>

Brian has already fixed this, please check that:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/ath.git/commit/?h=3Da=
th-next&id=3D20665a9076d48e9abd9a2db13d307f58f7ef6647

But apparently I forgot to merge ath-next to wireless-drivers-next, will
do that soon.

--=20
Kalle Valo=