2013-10-17 08:36:19

by Kalle Valo

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] ath10k: add error handling to ath10k_pci_wait()

ath10k_pci_wait() didn't notify any errors to callers, it
just printed a warning so add proper error handling.

Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c
index 1e9cfcc9..92759cd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c
@@ -525,15 +525,19 @@ static bool ath10k_pci_target_is_awake(struct ath10k *ar)
return (RTC_STATE_V_GET(val) == RTC_STATE_V_ON);
}

-static void ath10k_pci_wait(struct ath10k *ar)
+static int ath10k_pci_wait(struct ath10k *ar)
{
int n = 100;

while (n-- && !ath10k_pci_target_is_awake(ar))
msleep(10);

- if (n < 0)
+ if (n < 0) {
ath10k_warn("Unable to wakeup target\n");
+ return -ETIMEDOUT;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
}

int ath10k_do_pci_wake(struct ath10k *ar)
@@ -2227,7 +2231,13 @@ static int ath10k_pci_start_intr_legacy(struct ath10k *ar)
ar_pci->mem + PCIE_LOCAL_BASE_ADDRESS +
PCIE_SOC_WAKE_ADDRESS);

- ath10k_pci_wait(ar);
+ ret = ath10k_pci_wait(ar);
+ if (ret) {
+ ath10k_warn("Failed to enable legacy interrupt, target did not wake up: %d\n",
+ ret);
+ free_irq(ar_pci->pdev->irq, ar);
+ return ret;
+ }

/*
* A potential race occurs here: The CORE_BASE write
@@ -2290,6 +2300,10 @@ static int ath10k_pci_start_intr(struct ath10k *ar)
}

ret = ath10k_pci_start_intr_legacy(ar);
+ if (ret) {
+ ath10k_warn("Failed to start legacy interrupts: %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }

exit:
ar_pci->num_msi_intrs = num;
@@ -2315,13 +2329,19 @@ static int ath10k_pci_reset_target(struct ath10k *ar)
{
struct ath10k_pci *ar_pci = ath10k_pci_priv(ar);
int wait_limit = 300; /* 3 sec */
+ int ret;

/* Wait for Target to finish initialization before we proceed. */
iowrite32(PCIE_SOC_WAKE_V_MASK,
ar_pci->mem + PCIE_LOCAL_BASE_ADDRESS +
PCIE_SOC_WAKE_ADDRESS);

- ath10k_pci_wait(ar);
+ ret = ath10k_pci_wait(ar);
+ if (ret) {
+ ath10k_warn("Failed to reset target, target did not wake up: %d\n",
+ ret);
+ return ret;
+ }

while (wait_limit-- &&
!(ioread32(ar_pci->mem + FW_INDICATOR_ADDRESS) &



2013-10-21 14:19:07

by Kalle Valo

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: add error handling to ath10k_pci_wait()

Kalle Valo <[email protected]> writes:

> ath10k_pci_wait() didn't notify any errors to callers, it
> just printed a warning so add proper error handling.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <[email protected]>

Applied, I just changed the commit log to this:

commit f3782744c9b50edf94d28e37a937ff84f267dfab
Author: Kalle Valo <[email protected]>
Date: Thu Oct 17 11:36:15 2013 +0300

ath10k: add error handling to ath10k_pci_wait()

ath10k_pci_wait() didn't notify any errors to callers, it
just printed a warning so add proper error handling. This fixes
a crash Ben reported:

ath10k: MSI-X interrupt handling (8 intrs)
ath10k: Unable to wakeup target
ath10k: target took longer 5000 us to wake up (awake count 1)
ath10k: Failed to get pcie state addr: -16
ath10k: early firmware event indicated
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000004
IP: [<ffffffffa06ae46c>] ath10k_ce_completed_send_next+0x47/0x122 [ath10k_pci]

Reported-by: Ben Greear <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <[email protected]>

--
Kalle Valo

2013-10-17 14:27:28

by Kalle Valo

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: add error handling to ath10k_pci_wait()

Michal Kazior <[email protected]> writes:

> On 17 October 2013 01:36, Kalle Valo <[email protected]> wrote:
>> ath10k_pci_wait() didn't notify any errors to callers, it
>> just printed a warning so add proper error handling.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <[email protected]>

[...]

>> @@ -2227,7 +2231,13 @@ static int ath10k_pci_start_intr_legacy(struct ath10k *ar)
>> ar_pci->mem + PCIE_LOCAL_BASE_ADDRESS +
>> PCIE_SOC_WAKE_ADDRESS);
>>
>> - ath10k_pci_wait(ar);
>> + ret = ath10k_pci_wait(ar);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + ath10k_warn("Failed to enable legacy interrupt, target did not wake up: %d\n",
>> + ret);
>> + free_irq(ar_pci->pdev->irq, ar);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>
> I think we could actually use ath10k_do_pci_wake/sleep() here (see
> above iowrite). It does basically the same thing - sets the wake
> register and waits until HW wakes up. I think ath10k_pci_wait() could
> even go away.

That would be nice, I'll take a look. Thanks for the review.

--
Kalle Valo

2013-10-17 14:24:09

by Michal Kazior

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: add error handling to ath10k_pci_wait()

On 17 October 2013 01:36, Kalle Valo <[email protected]> wrote:
> ath10k_pci_wait() didn't notify any errors to callers, it
> just printed a warning so add proper error handling.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c
> index 1e9cfcc9..92759cd 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c
> @@ -525,15 +525,19 @@ static bool ath10k_pci_target_is_awake(struct ath10k *ar)
> return (RTC_STATE_V_GET(val) == RTC_STATE_V_ON);
> }
>
> -static void ath10k_pci_wait(struct ath10k *ar)
> +static int ath10k_pci_wait(struct ath10k *ar)
> {
> int n = 100;
>
> while (n-- && !ath10k_pci_target_is_awake(ar))
> msleep(10);
>
> - if (n < 0)
> + if (n < 0) {
> ath10k_warn("Unable to wakeup target\n");
> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> }
>
> int ath10k_do_pci_wake(struct ath10k *ar)
> @@ -2227,7 +2231,13 @@ static int ath10k_pci_start_intr_legacy(struct ath10k *ar)
> ar_pci->mem + PCIE_LOCAL_BASE_ADDRESS +
> PCIE_SOC_WAKE_ADDRESS);
>
> - ath10k_pci_wait(ar);
> + ret = ath10k_pci_wait(ar);
> + if (ret) {
> + ath10k_warn("Failed to enable legacy interrupt, target did not wake up: %d\n",
> + ret);
> + free_irq(ar_pci->pdev->irq, ar);
> + return ret;
> + }

I think we could actually use ath10k_do_pci_wake/sleep() here (see
above iowrite). It does basically the same thing - sets the wake
register and waits until HW wakes up. I think ath10k_pci_wait() could
even go away.


>
> /*
> * A potential race occurs here: The CORE_BASE write
> @@ -2290,6 +2300,10 @@ static int ath10k_pci_start_intr(struct ath10k *ar)
> }
>
> ret = ath10k_pci_start_intr_legacy(ar);
> + if (ret) {
> + ath10k_warn("Failed to start legacy interrupts: %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
>
> exit:
> ar_pci->num_msi_intrs = num;
> @@ -2315,13 +2329,19 @@ static int ath10k_pci_reset_target(struct ath10k *ar)
> {
> struct ath10k_pci *ar_pci = ath10k_pci_priv(ar);
> int wait_limit = 300; /* 3 sec */
> + int ret;
>
> /* Wait for Target to finish initialization before we proceed. */
> iowrite32(PCIE_SOC_WAKE_V_MASK,
> ar_pci->mem + PCIE_LOCAL_BASE_ADDRESS +
> PCIE_SOC_WAKE_ADDRESS);
>
> - ath10k_pci_wait(ar);
> + ret = ath10k_pci_wait(ar);
> + if (ret) {
> + ath10k_warn("Failed to reset target, target did not wake up: %d\n",
> + ret);
> + return ret;
> + }

Ditto.


MichaƂ