2011-08-16 16:51:11

by Guy Eilam

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v3] wl12xx: use 2 spare TX blocks for GEM cipher

Add tx_spare_blocks member to the wl1271 struct
for more generic configuration of the amount
of spare TX blocks that should be used.
The default value is 1.
In case GEM cipher is used by the STA, we need
2 spare TX blocks instead of just 1.

Signed-off-by: Guy Eilam <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/main.c | 13 +++++++++++++
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/tx.c | 8 +++++---
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/tx.h | 1 +
drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl12xx.h | 3 +++
4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/main.c
index 1c56137..e8d02e9 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/main.c
@@ -2110,6 +2110,7 @@ static void __wl1271_op_remove_interface(struct wl1271 *wl,
wl->rate_set = CONF_TX_RATE_MASK_BASIC;
wl->vif = NULL;
wl->filters = 0;
+ wl->tx_spare_blocks = TX_HW_BLOCK_SPARE_DEFAULT;
wl1271_free_ap_keys(wl);
memset(wl->ap_hlid_map, 0, sizeof(wl->ap_hlid_map));
wl->ap_fw_ps_map = 0;
@@ -2736,6 +2737,17 @@ static int wl1271_set_key(struct wl1271 *wl, u16 action, u8 id, u8 key_type,
0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff
};

+ /*
+ * A STA set to GEM cipher requires 2 tx spare blocks.
+ * Return to default value when GEM cipher key is removed
+ */
+ if (key_type == KEY_GEM) {
+ if (action == KEY_ADD_OR_REPLACE)
+ wl->tx_spare_blocks = 2;
+ else if (action == KEY_REMOVE)
+ wl->tx_spare_blocks = TX_HW_BLOCK_SPARE_DEFAULT;
+ }
+
addr = sta ? sta->addr : bcast_addr;

if (is_zero_ether_addr(addr)) {
@@ -4916,6 +4928,7 @@ struct ieee80211_hw *wl1271_alloc_hw(void)
wl->tx_security_seq = 0;
wl->tx_security_last_seq_lsb = 0;
wl->active_sta_count = 0;
+ wl->tx_spare_blocks = TX_HW_BLOCK_SPARE_DEFAULT;

setup_timer(&wl->rx_streaming_timer, wl1271_rx_streaming_timer,
(unsigned long) wl);
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/tx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/tx.c
index 367809e..8823c1f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/tx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/tx.c
@@ -200,9 +200,7 @@ static int wl1271_tx_allocate(struct wl1271 *wl, struct sk_buff *skb, u32 extra,
u32 len;
u32 total_blocks;
int id, ret = -EBUSY, ac;
-
- /* we use 1 spare block */
- u32 spare_blocks = 1;
+ u32 spare_blocks = wl->tx_spare_blocks;

if (buf_offset + total_len > WL1271_AGGR_BUFFER_SIZE)
return -EAGAIN;
@@ -216,6 +214,10 @@ static int wl1271_tx_allocate(struct wl1271 *wl, struct sk_buff *skb, u32 extra,
in the firmware */
len = wl12xx_calc_packet_alignment(wl, total_len);

+ /* in case of a dummy packet, use default amount of spare mem blocks */
+ if (unlikely(wl12xx_is_dummy_packet(wl, skb)))
+ spare_blocks = TX_HW_BLOCK_SPARE_DEFAULT;
+
total_blocks = (len + TX_HW_BLOCK_SIZE - 1) / TX_HW_BLOCK_SIZE +
spare_blocks;

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/tx.h b/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/tx.h
index e2f9150..bdbae8d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/tx.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/tx.h
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
#ifndef __TX_H__
#define __TX_H__

+#define TX_HW_BLOCK_SPARE_DEFAULT 1
#define TX_HW_BLOCK_SIZE 252

#define TX_HW_MGMT_PKT_LIFETIME_TU 2000
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl12xx.h b/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl12xx.h
index f528f61..3d847b5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl12xx.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl12xx.h
@@ -459,6 +459,9 @@ struct wl1271 {
u32 tx_allocated_blocks;
u32 tx_results_count;

+ /* amount of spare TX blocks to use */
+ u32 tx_spare_blocks;
+
/* Accounting for allocated / available Tx packets in HW */
u32 tx_pkts_freed[NUM_TX_QUEUES];
u32 tx_allocated_pkts[NUM_TX_QUEUES];
--
1.7.4.1



2011-08-25 07:18:49

by Luciano Coelho

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] wl12xx: use 2 spare TX blocks for GEM cipher

On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 19:49 +0300, Guy Eilam wrote:
> Add tx_spare_blocks member to the wl1271 struct
> for more generic configuration of the amount
> of spare TX blocks that should be used.
> The default value is 1.
> In case GEM cipher is used by the STA, we need
> 2 spare TX blocks instead of just 1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guy Eilam <[email protected]>
> ---

Applied, thanks!

--
Cheers,
Luca.


2011-08-22 07:42:05

by Luciano Coelho

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] wl12xx: use 2 spare TX blocks for GEM cipher

On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 19:49 +0300, Guy Eilam wrote:
> Add tx_spare_blocks member to the wl1271 struct
> for more generic configuration of the amount
> of spare TX blocks that should be used.
> The default value is 1.
> In case GEM cipher is used by the STA, we need
> 2 spare TX blocks instead of just 1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guy Eilam <[email protected]>
> ---

Next time when you send v2, v3 and so on, please add what has changed
comparing to the previous version. You can add free-format comments
just below the "---" after the signed-off-by line.


--
Cheers,
Luca.


2011-08-16 19:07:13

by Arik Nemtsov

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] wl12xx: use 2 spare TX blocks for GEM cipher

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 19:49, Guy Eilam <[email protected]> wrote:
> Add tx_spare_blocks member to the wl1271 struct
> for more generic configuration of the amount
> of spare TX blocks that should be used.
> The default value is 1.
> In case GEM cipher is used by the STA, we need
> 2 spare TX blocks instead of just 1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guy Eilam <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Arik Nemtsov <[email protected]>