2011-07-27 20:55:48

by Swaminathan Vasanth

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: problem on ACS


Hi all,
@ MingAnn Ng > If you increase the value for acs_num_req_surveys and
acs_roc_duration_ms, you will not get -inf as the interference value. I faced
this problem initially, but with more number of surveys ACS actually picks the
best channel.
@ Luis > I got convincing results on Channel selection. I also cross verified
the selected channel and the channels used by the nearby AP's through Kismet.
With 9 AP's using different channel, ACS selected the channel which was least
used. Great Work Luis !





2011-07-27 21:00:30

by Luis R. Rodriguez

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: problem on ACS

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Swaminathan Vasanth
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>  @ MingAnn Ng > If you increase the value for acs_num_req_surveys and
> acs_roc_duration_ms, you will not get -inf as the interference value. I faced
> this problem initially, but with more number of surveys ACS actually picks the
> best channel.
>  @ Luis > I got convincing results on Channel selection. I also cross verified
> the selected channel and the channels used by the nearby AP's through Kismet.
> With 9 AP's using different channel, ACS selected the channel which was least
> used. Great Work Luis !

Wow, awesome, thanks for the verification of the work :) truly the
implementation was just a rush job for an "intermediary" solution for
people who want ACS until we get Spectral Scan ACS support upstream.
Glad its working out as such.

Luis