Right, but same deal - if it asserts the line, it should stomp wifi
transmission in your particular scheme.
adrian
On 9 April 2013 19:37, sandeep suresh <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello Mr.Adrian,
> Thanks for your response. During googling, I had come across the
> following 2-wire coexistence solution from owl modules.
>
> http://support.connectblue.com/display/PRODWLAN/cB-OWL22x+Bluetooth+co-existence+application+note
> According to this application note, for 2-wire coexistence, WLAN_ACTIVE and
> BT_PRIORITY signals are used rather than WLAN_ACTIVE and BT_ACTIVE. What is
> your opinion on this? And as I understand owl modules are based on Atheros
> chipsets.
>
> Regards
> Sandeep.
>
> From: Adrian Chadd <[email protected]>
> To: sandeep suresh <[email protected]>
> Cc: Sujith Manoharan <[email protected]>; ath9k-devel
> <[email protected]>; "[email protected]"
> <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, 10 April 2013 4:30 AM
>
> Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] AR9287 ; 2-wire coexistence expected behavior
>
> Hi,
>
> Yes, "WLAN_ACTIVE" here is just both TX and RX activity.
>
> So if it were working, that would stay low.
>
>
>
> adrian
>
>