Signed-off-by: Ramon Fontes <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/mac80211_hwsim.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mac80211_hwsim.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mac80211_hwsim.c
index 0528d4cb4..67f97ac36 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/mac80211_hwsim.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mac80211_hwsim.c
@@ -2995,6 +2995,7 @@ static int mac80211_hwsim_new_radio(struct genl_info *info,
hw->wiphy->flags |= WIPHY_FLAG_SUPPORTS_TDLS |
WIPHY_FLAG_HAS_REMAIN_ON_CHANNEL |
WIPHY_FLAG_AP_UAPSD |
+ WIPHY_FLAG_SUPPORTS_5_10_MHZ |
WIPHY_FLAG_HAS_CHANNEL_SWITCH;
hw->wiphy->features |= NL80211_FEATURE_ACTIVE_MONITOR |
NL80211_FEATURE_AP_MODE_CHAN_WIDTH_CHANGE |
--
2.25.1
On Fri, 2020-05-15 at 13:46 -0300, Ramon Fontes wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Ramon Fontes <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/mac80211_hwsim.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mac80211_hwsim.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mac80211_hwsim.c
> index 0528d4cb4..67f97ac36 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mac80211_hwsim.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mac80211_hwsim.c
> @@ -2995,6 +2995,7 @@ static int mac80211_hwsim_new_radio(struct genl_info *info,
> hw->wiphy->flags |= WIPHY_FLAG_SUPPORTS_TDLS |
> WIPHY_FLAG_HAS_REMAIN_ON_CHANNEL |
> WIPHY_FLAG_AP_UAPSD |
> + WIPHY_FLAG_SUPPORTS_5_10_MHZ |
Not sure this is enough? How about wmediumd, for example?
And also, 5/10 MHz has many more channels inbetween the normal ones, no?
Shouldn't those also be added?
johannes
> Not sure this is enough? How about wmediumd, for example?
It works with wmediumd too. At least I was able to enable 5 / 10MHz
via iw with 5.9GHz
> And also, 5/10 MHz has many more channels inbetween the normal ones, no?
> Shouldn't those also be added?
Tested with 5855MHz - 5925MHz
--
Ramon
On Tue, 2020-05-26 at 08:36 -0300, Ramon Fontes wrote:
> > Not sure this is enough? How about wmediumd, for example?
>
> It works with wmediumd too. At least I was able to enable 5 / 10MHz
> via iw with 5.9GHz
Yeah, but wmediumd won't know that it's not 20 MHz, I guess :-)
> > And also, 5/10 MHz has many more channels inbetween the normal ones, no?
> > Shouldn't those also be added?
>
> Tested with 5855MHz - 5925MHz
Yeah, but which channels? I believe with 10 MHz you can also use channel
175, for example, which doesn't exist in 20 MHz channelization.
Anyway, I've applied it now, we can fix more later.
johannes
> Yeah, but wmediumd won't know that it's not 20 MHz, I guess :-)
Yes, I know. You're right! I hope advances in wmediumd in this regard :).
> Yeah, but which channels? I believe with 10 MHz you can also use channel
> 175, for example, which doesn't exist in 20 MHz channelization.
I'm doing some research with 802.11p and I could use all the channels
between 171 and 185 with both 5 and 10MHz.
> Anyway, I've applied it now, we can fix more later.
Thanks!
Ramon