2012-11-27 17:27:13

by Helmut Schaa

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] rt2x00: Use addr_mask to catch invalid MAC addresses (rt61pci, rt73usb)

rt61pci and rt73usb support up to four MAC addresses but only the last
two bits may differ. Hence, tell mac80211 an addr_mask of 0x3.

Signed-off-by: Helmut Schaa <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt61pci.c | 3 +++
drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt73usb.c | 3 +++
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt61pci.c b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt61pci.c
index d6582a2..ee8b44f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt61pci.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt61pci.c
@@ -2771,6 +2771,9 @@ static int rt61pci_probe_hw_mode(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev)
rt2x00_eeprom_addr(rt2x00dev,
EEPROM_MAC_ADDR_0));

+ /* Only the last two bits are variable in rt61pci devices. */
+ rt2x00dev->hw->wiphy->addr_mask[ETH_ALEN - 1] = 0x3;
+
/*
* As rt61 has a global fallback table we cannot specify
* more then one tx rate per frame but since the hw will
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt73usb.c b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt73usb.c
index 24eec66..6014cfe 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt73usb.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt73usb.c
@@ -2126,6 +2126,9 @@ static int rt73usb_probe_hw_mode(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev)
rt2x00_eeprom_addr(rt2x00dev,
EEPROM_MAC_ADDR_0));

+ /* Only the last two bits are variable in rt73usb devices. */
+ rt2x00dev->hw->wiphy->addr_mask[ETH_ALEN - 1] = 0x3;
+
/*
* Initialize hw_mode information.
*/
--
1.7.7



2012-11-28 07:57:41

by Gertjan van Wingerde

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rt2x00: Use addr_mask to catch invalid MAC addresses (rt61pci, rt73usb)

Hi Helmut,

On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Helmut Schaa
<[email protected]> wrote:
> rt61pci and rt73usb support up to four MAC addresses but only the last
> two bits may differ. Hence, tell mac80211 an addr_mask of 0x3.
>
> Signed-off-by: Helmut Schaa <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt61pci.c | 3 +++
> drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt73usb.c | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt61pci.c b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt61pci.c
> index d6582a2..ee8b44f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt61pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt61pci.c
> @@ -2771,6 +2771,9 @@ static int rt61pci_probe_hw_mode(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev)
> rt2x00_eeprom_addr(rt2x00dev,
> EEPROM_MAC_ADDR_0));
>
> + /* Only the last two bits are variable in rt61pci devices. */
> + rt2x00dev->hw->wiphy->addr_mask[ETH_ALEN - 1] = 0x3;
> +
> /*
> * As rt61 has a global fallback table we cannot specify
> * more then one tx rate per frame but since the hw will
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt73usb.c b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt73usb.c
> index 24eec66..6014cfe 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt73usb.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/rt73usb.c
> @@ -2126,6 +2126,9 @@ static int rt73usb_probe_hw_mode(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev)
> rt2x00_eeprom_addr(rt2x00dev,
> EEPROM_MAC_ADDR_0));
>
> + /* Only the last two bits are variable in rt73usb devices. */
> + rt2x00dev->hw->wiphy->addr_mask[ETH_ALEN - 1] = 0x3;
> +
> /*
> * Initialize hw_mode information.
> */

I think it is possible to collapse your rt2800 related patch and this
patch with a single patch only touching generic rt2x00 code.

We could use the max_ap_intf field of the rt2x00_ops struct to
determine the mask in a generic manner.

So, we could have the following statement in generic code (e.g. in
rt2x00lib_probe_dev):

rt2x00dev->hw->wiphy->addr_mask[ETH_ALEN - 1] =
(rt2x00dev->ops->max_ap_intf - 1);

---
Gertjan

2012-11-28 08:57:54

by Helmut Schaa

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rt2x00: Use addr_mask to catch invalid MAC addresses (rt61pci, rt73usb)

Hi,

On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Gertjan van Wingerde
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I think it is possible to collapse your rt2800 related patch and this
> patch with a single patch only touching generic rt2x00 code.
>
> We could use the max_ap_intf field of the rt2x00_ops struct to
> determine the mask in a generic manner.
>
> So, we could have the following statement in generic code (e.g. in
> rt2x00lib_probe_dev):
>
> rt2x00dev->hw->wiphy->addr_mask[ETH_ALEN - 1] =
> (rt2x00dev->ops->max_ap_intf - 1);

Good point. I'll change that accordingly.

Thanks,
Helmut