> > *does the other patch which remove some suspicious looking code, to
> > see if it improves the situation and avoids the warnings itself.
>
>I have built and loaded the kernel with this patch. I even have netconsole
>
> apparently working. But ten hours have not elapsed yet. So far so good.
>
> If it works till the 10th, I will test it with roaming, too.
Around 23 hours have elapsed.
WiFi seems to be working 100% of time. It is always at least lightly loaded.
Speedtests seems to gve slightly better upload results than I remember with
2.6.* (and I have a good enough ISP for WiFi to be the weakest link), so it
doesn't seem to be a performance regression, either.
As for roaming while connected - I will try not to forget to test it on the
10th.
2012/1/8 MR <[email protected]>:
> ?> ?> *does the other patch which remove some suspicious looking code, to
> ?> ?> see if it improves the situation and avoids the warnings itself.
> ?>
> ?>I have built and loaded the kernel with this patch. I even have netconsole
> ?>
> ?> apparently working. But ten hours have not elapsed yet. So far so good.
> ?>
> ?> If it works till the 10th, I will test it with roaming, too.
>
> Around 23 hours have elapsed.
>
> WiFi seems to be working 100% of time. It is always at least lightly loaded.
>
> Speedtests seems to gve slightly better upload results than I remember with
> 2.6.* (and I have a good enough ISP for WiFi to be the weakest link), so it
> doesn't seem to be a performance regression, either.
great and thanks a lot for testing!
rather than removing the suspicious code
this is properly fixed by us with this patch.
http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=132595161516806&w=2
you can download the raw message. please report back if you again
get the issue.
>
> As for roaming while connected - I will try not to forget to test it on the
> 10th.
>
>
--
shafi