Am 29.11.2020 um 22:17 schrieb Christophe JAILLET:
> he wrappers in include/linux/pci-dma-compat.h should go away.
>
> The patch has been generated with the coccinelle script below and has been
> hand modified to replace GFP_ with a correct flag.
> It has been compile tested.
>
> When memory is allocated in 'mlxsw_pci_queue_init()' and
> 'mlxsw_pci_fw_area_init()' GFP_KERNEL can be used because this flag is
> already used in the same function.
>
> When memory is allocated in 'mlxsw_pci_mbox_alloc()' GFP_KERNEL can be
> used because it is only called from a probe function. The call chain is:
> --> mlxsw_pci_probe
> --> mlxsw_pci_cmd_init
> --> mlxsw_pci_mbox_alloc
>
> @@
> @@
> - PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL
> + DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL
>
> @@
> @@
> - PCI_DMA_TODEVICE
> + DMA_TO_DEVICE
>
> @@
> @@
> - PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE
> + DMA_FROM_DEVICE
>
> @@
> @@
> - PCI_DMA_NONE
> + DMA_NONE
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3;
> @@
> - pci_alloc_consistent(e1, e2, e3)
> + dma_alloc_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, GFP_)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3;
> @@
> - pci_zalloc_consistent(e1, e2, e3)
> + dma_alloc_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, GFP_)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> - pci_free_consistent(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> + dma_free_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> - pci_map_single(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> + dma_map_single(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> - pci_unmap_single(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> + dma_unmap_single(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4, e5;
> @@
> - pci_map_page(e1, e2, e3, e4, e5)
> + dma_map_page(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4, e5)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> - pci_unmap_page(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> + dma_unmap_page(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> - pci_map_sg(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> + dma_map_sg(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> - pci_unmap_sg(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> + dma_unmap_sg(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> - pci_dma_sync_single_for_cpu(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> + dma_sync_single_for_cpu(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> - pci_dma_sync_single_for_device(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> + dma_sync_single_for_device(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> - pci_dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> + dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> - pci_dma_sync_sg_for_device(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> + dma_sync_sg_for_device(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2;
> @@
> - pci_dma_mapping_error(e1, e2)
> + dma_mapping_error(&e1->dev, e2)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2;
> @@
> - pci_set_dma_mask(e1, e2)
> + dma_set_mask(&e1->dev, e2)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2;
> @@
> - pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(e1, e2)
> + dma_set_coherent_mask(&e1->dev, e2)
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <[email protected]>
> ---
> If needed, see post from Christoph Hellwig on the kernel-janitors ML:
> https://marc.info/?l=kernel-janitors&m=158745678307186&w=4
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/pci.c | 52 +++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/pci.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/pci.c
> index 641cdd81882b..7519d3b6934e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/pci.c
> @@ -323,8 +323,8 @@ static int mlxsw_pci_wqe_frag_map(struct mlxsw_pci *mlxsw_pci, char *wqe,
> struct pci_dev *pdev = mlxsw_pci->pdev;
> dma_addr_t mapaddr;
>
> - mapaddr = pci_map_single(pdev, frag_data, frag_len, direction);
> - if (unlikely(pci_dma_mapping_error(pdev, mapaddr))) {
> + mapaddr = dma_map_single(&pdev->dev, frag_data, frag_len, direction);
> + if (unlikely(dma_mapping_error(&pdev->dev, mapaddr))) {
> dev_err_ratelimited(&pdev->dev, "failed to dma map tx frag\n");
> return -EIO;
> }
> @@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ static void mlxsw_pci_wqe_frag_unmap(struct mlxsw_pci *mlxsw_pci, char *wqe,
>
> if (!frag_len)
> return;
> - pci_unmap_single(pdev, mapaddr, frag_len, direction);
> + dma_unmap_single(&pdev->dev, mapaddr, frag_len, direction);
> }
>
> static int mlxsw_pci_rdq_skb_alloc(struct mlxsw_pci *mlxsw_pci,
> @@ -858,9 +858,9 @@ static int mlxsw_pci_queue_init(struct mlxsw_pci *mlxsw_pci, char *mbox,
> tasklet_setup(&q->tasklet, q_ops->tasklet);
>
> mem_item->size = MLXSW_PCI_AQ_SIZE;
> - mem_item->buf = pci_alloc_consistent(mlxsw_pci->pdev,
> - mem_item->size,
> - &mem_item->mapaddr);
> + mem_item->buf = dma_alloc_coherent(&mlxsw_pci->pdev->dev,
> + mem_item->size, &mem_item->mapaddr,
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!mem_item->buf)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> @@ -890,8 +890,8 @@ static int mlxsw_pci_queue_init(struct mlxsw_pci *mlxsw_pci, char *mbox,
> err_q_ops_init:
> kfree(q->elem_info);
> err_elem_info_alloc:
> - pci_free_consistent(mlxsw_pci->pdev, mem_item->size,
> - mem_item->buf, mem_item->mapaddr);
> + dma_free_coherent(&mlxsw_pci->pdev->dev, mem_item->size,
> + mem_item->buf, mem_item->mapaddr);
> return err;
> }
>
> @@ -903,8 +903,8 @@ static void mlxsw_pci_queue_fini(struct mlxsw_pci *mlxsw_pci,
>
> q_ops->fini(mlxsw_pci, q);
> kfree(q->elem_info);
> - pci_free_consistent(mlxsw_pci->pdev, mem_item->size,
> - mem_item->buf, mem_item->mapaddr);
> + dma_free_coherent(&mlxsw_pci->pdev->dev, mem_item->size,
> + mem_item->buf, mem_item->mapaddr);
> }
>
> static int mlxsw_pci_queue_group_init(struct mlxsw_pci *mlxsw_pci, char *mbox,
> @@ -1242,9 +1242,9 @@ static int mlxsw_pci_fw_area_init(struct mlxsw_pci *mlxsw_pci, char *mbox,
> mem_item = &mlxsw_pci->fw_area.items[i];
>
> mem_item->size = MLXSW_PCI_PAGE_SIZE;
> - mem_item->buf = pci_alloc_consistent(mlxsw_pci->pdev,
> - mem_item->size,
> - &mem_item->mapaddr);
> + mem_item->buf = dma_alloc_coherent(&mlxsw_pci->pdev->dev,
> + mem_item->size,
> + &mem_item->mapaddr, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!mem_item->buf) {
> err = -ENOMEM;
> goto err_alloc;
> @@ -1273,8 +1273,8 @@ static int mlxsw_pci_fw_area_init(struct mlxsw_pci *mlxsw_pci, char *mbox,
> for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
> mem_item = &mlxsw_pci->fw_area.items[i];
>
> - pci_free_consistent(mlxsw_pci->pdev, mem_item->size,
> - mem_item->buf, mem_item->mapaddr);
> + dma_free_coherent(&mlxsw_pci->pdev->dev, mem_item->size,
> + mem_item->buf, mem_item->mapaddr);
> }
> kfree(mlxsw_pci->fw_area.items);
> return err;
> @@ -1290,8 +1290,8 @@ static void mlxsw_pci_fw_area_fini(struct mlxsw_pci *mlxsw_pci)
> for (i = 0; i < mlxsw_pci->fw_area.count; i++) {
> mem_item = &mlxsw_pci->fw_area.items[i];
>
> - pci_free_consistent(mlxsw_pci->pdev, mem_item->size,
> - mem_item->buf, mem_item->mapaddr);
> + dma_free_coherent(&mlxsw_pci->pdev->dev, mem_item->size,
> + mem_item->buf, mem_item->mapaddr);
> }
> kfree(mlxsw_pci->fw_area.items);
> }
> @@ -1316,8 +1316,8 @@ static int mlxsw_pci_mbox_alloc(struct mlxsw_pci *mlxsw_pci,
> int err = 0;
>
> mbox->size = MLXSW_CMD_MBOX_SIZE;
> - mbox->buf = pci_alloc_consistent(pdev, MLXSW_CMD_MBOX_SIZE,
> - &mbox->mapaddr);
> + mbox->buf = dma_alloc_coherent(&pdev->dev, MLXSW_CMD_MBOX_SIZE,
> + &mbox->mapaddr, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!mbox->buf) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed allocating memory for mailbox\n");
> err = -ENOMEM;
> @@ -1331,8 +1331,8 @@ static void mlxsw_pci_mbox_free(struct mlxsw_pci *mlxsw_pci,
> {
> struct pci_dev *pdev = mlxsw_pci->pdev;
>
> - pci_free_consistent(pdev, MLXSW_CMD_MBOX_SIZE, mbox->buf,
> - mbox->mapaddr);
> + dma_free_coherent(&pdev->dev, MLXSW_CMD_MBOX_SIZE, mbox->buf,
> + mbox->mapaddr);
> }
>
> static int mlxsw_pci_sys_ready_wait(struct mlxsw_pci *mlxsw_pci,
> @@ -1817,17 +1817,17 @@ static int mlxsw_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
> goto err_pci_request_regions;
> }
>
> - err = pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
> + err = dma_set_mask(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
Using dma_set_mask_and_coherent() would be better here.
> if (!err) {
> - err = pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(pdev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
> + err = dma_set_coherent_mask(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
> if (err) {
This check isn't needed, see comment at definition of
dma_set_mask_and_coherent().
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "pci_set_consistent_dma_mask failed\n");
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "dma_set_coherent_mask failed\n");
> goto err_pci_set_dma_mask;
> }
> } else {
> - err = pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
> + err = dma_set_mask(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
> if (err) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "pci_set_dma_mask failed\n");
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "dma_set_mask failed\n");
> goto err_pci_set_dma_mask;
> }
> }
>
Le 29/11/2020 à 22:46, Heiner Kallweit a écrit :
> Am 29.11.2020 um 22:17 schrieb Christophe JAILLET:
>> @@ -1817,17 +1817,17 @@ static int mlxsw_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
>> goto err_pci_request_regions;
>> }
>>
>> - err = pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
>> + err = dma_set_mask(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
>
> Using dma_set_mask_and_coherent() would be better here.
>
>> if (!err) {
>> - err = pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(pdev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
>> + err = dma_set_coherent_mask(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
>> if (err) {
>
> This check isn't needed, see comment at definition of
> dma_set_mask_and_coherent().
>
Hi,
Correct, but I didn't want to mix several things in the same commit.
This one is dedicated to automatically generated changes done with
coccinelle.
I plan to have another set of such clean-ups once "wrappers in
include/linux/pci-dma-compat.h are gone"
However, if it is prefered to have only one patch, I can resubmit.
CJ