2018-06-26 07:17:26

by Manikanta Pubbisetty

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] mac80211: add stop/start logic for software TXQs

Sometimes, it is required to stop the transmissions momentarily and
resume it later; stopping the txqs becomes very critical in scenarios where
the packet transmission has to be ceased completely. For example, during
the hardware restart, during off channel operations,
when initiating CSA(upon detecting a radar on the DFS channel), etc.

The TX queue stop/start logic in mac80211 works well in stopping the TX
when drivers make use of netdev queues, i.e, when Qdiscs in network layer
take care of traffic scheduling. Since the devices implementing
wake_tx_queue can run without Qdiscs, packets will be handed to mac80211
directly without queueing them in the netdev queues.

Also, mac80211 does not invoke any of the
netif_stop_*/netif_wake_* APIs if wake_tx_queue is implemented.
Since the queues are not stopped in this case, transmissions can continue
and this will impact negatively on the operation of the wireless device.

For example,
During hardware restart, we stop the netdev queues so that packets are
not sent to the driver. Since ath10k implements wake_tx_queue,
TX queues will not be stopped and packets might reach the hardware while
it is restarting; this can make hardware unresponsive and the only
possible option for recovery is to reboot the entire system.

There is another problem to this, it is observed that the packets
were sent on the DFS channel for a prolonged duration after radar
detection impacting the channel closing times.

We can still invoke netif stop/wake APIs when wake_tx_queue is implemented
but this could lead to packet drops in network layer; adding stop/start
logic for software TXQs in mac80211 instead makes more sense; the change
proposed adds the same in mac80211.

Signed-off-by: Manikanta Pubbisetty <[email protected]>
---
net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h | 6 +++++
net/mac80211/sta_info.h | 1 +
net/mac80211/tx.c | 13 +++++++++-
net/mac80211/util.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
4 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h b/net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h
index 172aeae..500da15 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h
+++ b/net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h
@@ -818,6 +818,7 @@ enum txq_info_flags {
IEEE80211_TXQ_STOP,
IEEE80211_TXQ_AMPDU,
IEEE80211_TXQ_NO_AMSDU,
+ IEEE80211_TXQ_PAUSED,
};

/**
@@ -1139,6 +1140,11 @@ struct ieee80211_local {
/* also used to protect ampdu_ac_queue and amdpu_ac_stop_refcnt */
spinlock_t queue_stop_reason_lock;

+ /* pause/resume logic for intermediate software queues,
+ * applicable when wake_tx_queue is defined.
+ */
+ unsigned long txqs_stopped;
+
int open_count;
int monitors, cooked_mntrs;
/* number of interfaces with corresponding FIF_ flags */
diff --git a/net/mac80211/sta_info.h b/net/mac80211/sta_info.h
index 9a04327..82e5bbb 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/sta_info.h
+++ b/net/mac80211/sta_info.h
@@ -582,6 +582,7 @@ struct sta_info {
u8 reserved_tid;

struct cfg80211_chan_def tdls_chandef;
+ atomic_t txqs_paused;

/* keep last! */
struct ieee80211_sta sta;
diff --git a/net/mac80211/tx.c b/net/mac80211/tx.c
index 5b93bde..9b30ee6 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/tx.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/tx.c
@@ -3467,12 +3467,23 @@ struct sk_buff *ieee80211_tx_dequeue(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
struct ieee80211_tx_data tx;
ieee80211_tx_result r;
struct ieee80211_vif *vif;
+ struct sta_info *sta;

spin_lock_bh(&fq->lock);

- if (test_bit(IEEE80211_TXQ_STOP, &txqi->flags))
+ if (test_bit(IEEE80211_TXQ_STOP, &txqi->flags) ||
+ test_bit(IEEE80211_TXQ_PAUSED, &txqi->flags))
goto out;

+ if (local->txqs_stopped) {
+ set_bit(IEEE80211_TXQ_PAUSED, &txqi->flags);
+ if (txq->sta) {
+ sta = container_of(txq->sta, struct sta_info, sta);
+ atomic_set(&sta->txqs_paused, 1);
+ }
+ goto out;
+ }
+
/* Make sure fragments stay together. */
skb = __skb_dequeue(&txqi->frags);
if (skb)
diff --git a/net/mac80211/util.c b/net/mac80211/util.c
index c77c843..b9db417 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/util.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/util.c
@@ -273,6 +273,62 @@ void ieee80211_propagate_queue_wake(struct ieee80211_local *local, int queue)
}
}

+static void ieee80211_wake_txqs(struct ieee80211_local *local)
+{
+ struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata;
+ struct sta_info *sta;
+ struct txq_info *txqi;
+ int i;
+
+ if (!local->ops->wake_tx_queue)
+ return;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(sta, &local->sta_list, list) {
+ if (!atomic_read(&sta->txqs_paused))
+ continue;
+
+ atomic_set(&sta->txqs_paused, 0);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sta->sta.txq); i++) {
+ txqi = to_txq_info(sta->sta.txq[i]);
+
+ if (!test_and_clear_bit(IEEE80211_TXQ_PAUSED,
+ &txqi->flags))
+ continue;
+
+ drv_wake_tx_queue(local, txqi);
+ }
+ }
+
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(sdata, &local->interfaces, list) {
+ struct ieee80211_vif *vif = &sdata->vif;
+ struct ps_data *ps = NULL;
+
+ /* Software interfaces like AP_VLAN, monitor do not have
+ * vif specific queues.
+ */
+ if (!sdata->dev || !vif->txq)
+ continue;
+
+ txqi = to_txq_info(vif->txq);
+
+ if (!test_and_clear_bit(IEEE80211_TXQ_PAUSED, &txqi->flags))
+ continue;
+
+ if (sdata->vif.type == NL80211_IFTYPE_AP)
+ ps = &sdata->bss->ps;
+
+ if (ps && atomic_read(&ps->num_sta_ps))
+ continue;
+
+ drv_wake_tx_queue(local, txqi);
+ }
+
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+}
+
static void __ieee80211_wake_queue(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, int queue,
enum queue_stop_reason reason,
bool refcounted)
@@ -298,10 +354,15 @@ static void __ieee80211_wake_queue(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, int queue,
if (local->q_stop_reasons[queue][reason] == 0)
__clear_bit(reason, &local->queue_stop_reasons[queue]);

+ if (local->ops->wake_tx_queue)
+ __clear_bit(reason, &local->txqs_stopped);
+
if (local->queue_stop_reasons[queue] != 0)
/* someone still has this queue stopped */
return;

+ ieee80211_wake_txqs(local);
+
if (skb_queue_empty(&local->pending[queue])) {
rcu_read_lock();
ieee80211_propagate_queue_wake(local, queue);
@@ -351,8 +412,10 @@ static void __ieee80211_stop_queue(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, int queue,
if (__test_and_set_bit(reason, &local->queue_stop_reasons[queue]))
return;

- if (local->ops->wake_tx_queue)
+ if (local->ops->wake_tx_queue) {
+ __set_bit(reason, &local->txqs_stopped);
return;
+ }

if (local->hw.queues < IEEE80211_NUM_ACS)
n_acs = 1;
--
2.7.4


2018-06-29 09:09:38

by Johannes Berg

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: add stop/start logic for software TXQs

On Tue, 2018-06-26 at 12:46 +0530, Manikanta Pubbisetty wrote:
>
> - if (test_bit(IEEE80211_TXQ_STOP, &txqi->flags))
> + if (test_bit(IEEE80211_TXQ_STOP, &txqi->flags) ||
> + test_bit(IEEE80211_TXQ_PAUSED, &txqi->flags))
> goto out;
>
> + if (local->txqs_stopped) {

How is it even possible to have txqs_stopped set, but not TXQ_PAUSED? It
seemed to me - from a first glance at the rest of the code - that the
txqs_stopped is just tracking when you can re-enable, but you propagate
it to the TXQs?

> + set_bit(IEEE80211_TXQ_PAUSED, &txqi->flags);

Oh. Or maybe I just misread that and you're only "lazily" propagating it
here?

> + if (txq->sta) {
> + sta = container_of(txq->sta, struct sta_info, sta);
> + atomic_set(&sta->txqs_paused, 1);
> + }

It seems to me you could remove this - possibly at the expense of doing
a little more work in ieee80211_wake_txqs()?

Have you measured it and found it to be a problem?

The atomic stuff here doesn't work the way you want it to though. In
fact, even the lazy propagation doesn't work the way you want it to, I
think!

Thinking about it:

CPU 1 CPU 2
* you're disabling TX
-> local->txqs_stopped = 1
* check local->txqs_stopped
* re-enable TX
-> local->txqs_stopped = 0
* call ieee80211_wake_txqs()
check sta->txqs_paused
* set txq->flags |= PAUSED
* set sta->txqs_paused

I don't see how you can prevent this right now? In
ieee80211_tx_dequeue() you have the fq lock, but you're not taking it on
the other side (in __ieee80211_stop_queue/__ieee80211_wake_queue).

If you always iterate the stas/TXQs and set the PAUSED bit non-lazily at
least you have a single source of truth. You may still need the
txqs_stopped bitmap, but only in stop_queue/wake_queue which has its own
locking.


> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sta->sta.txq); i++) {
> + txqi = to_txq_info(sta->sta.txq[i]);
> +
> + if (!test_and_clear_bit(IEEE80211_TXQ_PAUSED,
> + &txqi->flags))
> + continue;
> +
> + drv_wake_tx_queue(local, txqi);

Maybe that should be conditional on there being packets? Actually, no
... ok, the lazy setting helps you with this because it means that the
driver wanted a packet but didn't get one, so now you should wake it. If
it never wanted a packet, then you don't care about the state.

Ok - so that means we need to keep the lazy setting, but fix the locking
:-)

> + /* Software interfaces like AP_VLAN, monitor do not have
> + * vif specific queues.
> + */
> + if (!sdata->dev || !vif->txq)
> + continue;

Is there any way you can have vif->txq && !sdata->dev? It seems to me
that no, and then you only need the vif->txq check?

> @@ -298,10 +354,15 @@ static void __ieee80211_wake_queue(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, int queue,
> if (local->q_stop_reasons[queue][reason] == 0)
> __clear_bit(reason, &local->queue_stop_reasons[queue]);
>
> + if (local->ops->wake_tx_queue)
> + __clear_bit(reason, &local->txqs_stopped);
> +
> if (local->queue_stop_reasons[queue] != 0)
> /* someone still has this queue stopped */
> return;
>
> + ieee80211_wake_txqs(local);

I'm not sure this is the right place to hook in?

This might interact really strangely with drivers - which also get here.
Perhaps we should make this conditional on reason != DRIVER?

Also, your bitmap setting should be different - it should be per queue?
But then since "queue" here should basically be an AC for iTXQ drivers,
I think you need to handle that properly.

Right now you get bugs if you do

stop_queue(0, reason=aggregation)
stop_queue(1, reason=aggregation)
wake_queue(0, reason=aggregation)

-> TXQs will wake up because local->txqs_stopped is only stopping the
reason, not the queue number.


So to summarize:
* overall the approach seems fine, and the lazy disabling is probably
for the better, but
* need to address locking issues with that, and
* need to address the refcounting issues.


johannes

2018-06-26 11:28:12

by kernel test robot

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: add stop/start logic for software TXQs

Hi Manikanta,

Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on mac80211-next/master]
[also build test WARNING on v4.18-rc2 next-20180626]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]

url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Manikanta-Pubbisetty/mac80211-add-stop-start-logic-for-software-TXQs/20180626-153410
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jberg/mac80211-next.git master
reproduce: make htmldocs

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

WARNING: convert(1) not found, for SVG to PDF conversion install ImageMagick (https://www.imagemagick.org)
mm/mempool.c:228: warning: Function parameter or member 'pool' not described in 'mempool_init'
Error: Cannot open file arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/main.c
Error: Cannot open file arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/main.c
WARNING: kernel-doc 'scripts/kernel-doc -rst -enable-lineno -export arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/main.c' failed with return code 2
include/net/cfg80211.h:4381: warning: Function parameter or member 'wext.ibss' not described in 'wireless_dev'
include/net/cfg80211.h:4381: warning: Function parameter or member 'wext.connect' not described in 'wireless_dev'
include/net/cfg80211.h:4381: warning: Function parameter or member 'wext.keys' not described in 'wireless_dev'
include/net/cfg80211.h:4381: warning: Function parameter or member 'wext.ie' not described in 'wireless_dev'
include/net/cfg80211.h:4381: warning: Function parameter or member 'wext.ie_len' not described in 'wireless_dev'
include/net/cfg80211.h:4381: warning: Function parameter or member 'wext.bssid' not described in 'wireless_dev'
include/net/cfg80211.h:4381: warning: Function parameter or member 'wext.ssid' not described in 'wireless_dev'
include/net/cfg80211.h:4381: warning: Function parameter or member 'wext.default_key' not described in 'wireless_dev'
include/net/cfg80211.h:4381: warning: Function parameter or member 'wext.default_mgmt_key' not described in 'wireless_dev'
include/net/cfg80211.h:4381: warning: Function parameter or member 'wext.prev_bssid_valid' not described in 'wireless_dev'
include/net/mac80211.h:2328: warning: Function parameter or member 'radiotap_timestamp.units_pos' not described in 'ieee80211_hw'
include/net/mac80211.h:2328: warning: Function parameter or member 'radiotap_timestamp.accuracy' not described in 'ieee80211_hw'
include/net/mac80211.h:977: warning: Function parameter or member 'control.rates' not described in 'ieee80211_tx_info'
include/net/mac80211.h:977: warning: Function parameter or member 'control.rts_cts_rate_idx' not described in 'ieee80211_tx_info'
include/net/mac80211.h:977: warning: Function parameter or member 'control.use_rts' not described in 'ieee80211_tx_info'
include/net/mac80211.h:977: warning: Function parameter or member 'control.use_cts_prot' not described in 'ieee80211_tx_info'
include/net/mac80211.h:977: warning: Function parameter or member 'control.short_preamble' not described in 'ieee80211_tx_info'
include/net/mac80211.h:977: warning: Function parameter or member 'control.skip_table' not described in 'ieee80211_tx_info'
include/net/mac80211.h:977: warning: Function parameter or member 'control.jiffies' not described in 'ieee80211_tx_info'
include/net/mac80211.h:977: warning: Function parameter or member 'control.vif' not described in 'ieee80211_tx_info'
include/net/mac80211.h:977: warning: Function parameter or member 'control.hw_key' not described in 'ieee80211_tx_info'
include/net/mac80211.h:977: warning: Function parameter or member 'control.flags' not described in 'ieee80211_tx_info'
include/net/mac80211.h:977: warning: Function parameter or member 'control.enqueue_time' not described in 'ieee80211_tx_info'
include/net/mac80211.h:977: warning: Function parameter or member 'ack' not described in 'ieee80211_tx_info'
include/net/mac80211.h:977: warning: Function parameter or member 'ack.cookie' not described in 'ieee80211_tx_info'
include/net/mac80211.h:977: warning: Function parameter or member 'status.rates' not described in 'ieee80211_tx_info'
include/net/mac80211.h:977: warning: Function parameter or member 'status.ack_signal' not described in 'ieee80211_tx_info'
include/net/mac80211.h:977: warning: Function parameter or member 'status.ampdu_ack_len' not described in 'ieee80211_tx_info'
include/net/mac80211.h:977: warning: Function parameter or member 'status.ampdu_len' not described in 'ieee80211_tx_info'
include/net/mac80211.h:977: warning: Function parameter or member 'status.antenna' not described in 'ieee80211_tx_info'
include/net/mac80211.h:977: warning: Function parameter or member 'status.tx_time' not described in 'ieee80211_tx_info'
include/net/mac80211.h:977: warning: Function parameter or member 'status.is_valid_ack_signal' not described in 'ieee80211_tx_info'
include/net/mac80211.h:977: warning: Function parameter or member 'status.status_driver_data' not described in 'ieee80211_tx_info'
include/net/mac80211.h:977: warning: Function parameter or member 'driver_rates' not described in 'ieee80211_tx_info'
include/net/mac80211.h:977: warning: Function parameter or member 'pad' not described in 'ieee80211_tx_info'
include/net/mac80211.h:977: warning: Function parameter or member 'rate_driver_data' not described in 'ieee80211_tx_info'
net/mac80211/sta_info.h:589: warning: Function parameter or member 'rx_stats_avg' not described in 'sta_info'
net/mac80211/sta_info.h:589: warning: Function parameter or member 'rx_stats_avg.signal' not described in 'sta_info'
net/mac80211/sta_info.h:589: warning: Function parameter or member 'rx_stats_avg.chain_signal' not described in 'sta_info'
net/mac80211/sta_info.h:589: warning: Function parameter or member 'status_stats.filtered' not described in 'sta_info'
net/mac80211/sta_info.h:589: warning: Function parameter or member 'status_stats.retry_failed' not described in 'sta_info'
net/mac80211/sta_info.h:589: warning: Function parameter or member 'status_stats.retry_count' not described in 'sta_info'
net/mac80211/sta_info.h:589: warning: Function parameter or member 'status_stats.lost_packets' not described in 'sta_info'
net/mac80211/sta_info.h:589: warning: Function parameter or member 'status_stats.last_tdls_pkt_time' not described in 'sta_info'
net/mac80211/sta_info.h:589: warning: Function parameter or member 'status_stats.msdu_retries' not described in 'sta_info'
net/mac80211/sta_info.h:589: warning: Function parameter or member 'status_stats.msdu_failed' not described in 'sta_info'
net/mac80211/sta_info.h:589: warning: Function parameter or member 'status_stats.last_ack' not described in 'sta_info'
net/mac80211/sta_info.h:589: warning: Function parameter or member 'status_stats.last_ack_signal' not described in 'sta_info'
net/mac80211/sta_info.h:589: warning: Function parameter or member 'status_stats.ack_signal_filled' not described in 'sta_info'
net/mac80211/sta_info.h:589: warning: Function parameter or member 'status_stats.avg_ack_signal' not described in 'sta_info'
net/mac80211/sta_info.h:589: warning: Function parameter or member 'tx_stats.packets' not described in 'sta_info'
net/mac80211/sta_info.h:589: warning: Function parameter or member 'tx_stats.bytes' not described in 'sta_info'
net/mac80211/sta_info.h:589: warning: Function parameter or member 'tx_stats.last_rate' not described in 'sta_info'
net/mac80211/sta_info.h:589: warning: Function parameter or member 'tx_stats.msdu' not described in 'sta_info'
>> net/mac80211/sta_info.h:589: warning: Function parameter or member 'txqs_paused' not described in 'sta_info'
kernel/sched/fair.c:3760: warning: Function parameter or member 'flags' not described in 'attach_entity_load_avg'
include/linux/device.h:93: warning: bad line: this bus.
include/linux/dma-buf.h:307: warning: Function parameter or member 'cb_excl.cb' not described in 'dma_buf'
include/linux/dma-buf.h:307: warning: Function parameter or member 'cb_excl.poll' not described in 'dma_buf'
include/linux/dma-buf.h:307: warning: Function parameter or member 'cb_excl.active' not described in 'dma_buf'
include/linux/dma-buf.h:307: warning: Function parameter or member 'cb_shared.cb' not described in 'dma_buf'
include/linux/dma-buf.h:307: warning: Function parameter or member 'cb_shared.poll' not described in 'dma_buf'
include/linux/dma-buf.h:307: warning: Function parameter or member 'cb_shared.active' not described in 'dma_buf'
include/linux/dma-fence-array.h:54: warning: Function parameter or member 'work' not described in 'dma_fence_array'
include/linux/gpio/driver.h:142: warning: Function parameter or member 'request_key' not described in 'gpio_irq_chip'
include/linux/iio/hw-consumer.h:1: warning: no structured comments found
include/linux/device.h:94: warning: bad line: this bus.
include/linux/input/sparse-keymap.h:46: warning: Function parameter or member 'sw' not described in 'key_entry'
include/linux/regulator/driver.h:227: warning: Function parameter or member 'resume_early' not described in 'regulator_ops'
drivers/regulator/core.c:4465: warning: Excess function parameter 'state' description in 'regulator_suspend_late'
arch/s390/include/asm/cio.h:245: warning: Function parameter or member 'esw.esw0' not described in 'irb'
arch/s390/include/asm/cio.h:245: warning: Function parameter or member 'esw.esw1' not described in 'irb'
arch/s390/include/asm/cio.h:245: warning: Function parameter or member 'esw.esw2' not described in 'irb'
arch/s390/include/asm/cio.h:245: warning: Function parameter or member 'esw.esw3' not described in 'irb'
arch/s390/include/asm/cio.h:245: warning: Function parameter or member 'esw.eadm' not described in 'irb'
drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c:510: warning: Excess function parameter 'dwc' description in 'dwc3_gadget_start_config'
include/drm/drm_drv.h:610: warning: Function parameter or member 'gem_prime_pin' not described in 'drm_driver'
include/drm/drm_drv.h:610: warning: Function parameter or member 'gem_prime_unpin' not described in 'drm_driver'
include/drm/drm_drv.h:610: warning: Function parameter or member 'gem_prime_res_obj' not described in 'drm_driver'
include/drm/drm_drv.h:610: warning: Function parameter or member 'gem_prime_get_sg_table' not described in 'drm_driver'
include/drm/drm_drv.h:610: warning: Function parameter or member 'gem_prime_import_sg_table' not described in 'drm_driver'
include/drm/drm_drv.h:610: warning: Function parameter or member 'gem_prime_vmap' not described in 'drm_driver'
include/drm/drm_drv.h:610: warning: Function parameter or member 'gem_prime_vunmap' not described in 'drm_driver'
include/drm/drm_drv.h:610: warning: Function parameter or member 'gem_prime_mmap' not described in 'drm_driver'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.h:48: warning: cannot understand function prototype: 'struct i915_vma '
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.h:1: warning: no structured comments found
include/drm/tinydrm/tinydrm.h:34: warning: Function parameter or member 'fb_dirty' not described in 'tinydrm_device'
drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/mipi-dbi.c:272: warning: Function parameter or member 'crtc_state' not described in 'mipi_dbi_enable_flush'
drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/mipi-dbi.c:272: warning: Function parameter or member 'plane_state' not described in 'mipi_dbi_enable_flush'

vim +589 net/mac80211/sta_info.h

17741cdc2 Johannes Berg 2008-09-11 574
0af83d3df Johannes Berg 2012-12-27 575 enum ieee80211_sta_rx_bandwidth cur_max_bandwidth;
0af83d3df Johannes Berg 2012-12-27 576
687da1322 Emmanuel Grumbach 2013-10-01 577 enum ieee80211_smps_mode known_smps_mode;
2475b1cc0 Max Stepanov 2013-03-24 578 const struct ieee80211_cipher_scheme *cipher_scheme;
687da1322 Emmanuel Grumbach 2013-10-01 579
484a54c2e Toke H?iland-J?rgensen 2017-04-06 580 struct codel_params cparams;
484a54c2e Toke H?iland-J?rgensen 2017-04-06 581
b6da911b3 Liad Kaufman 2014-11-19 582 u8 reserved_tid;
b6da911b3 Liad Kaufman 2014-11-19 583
0fabfaafe Arik Nemtsov 2015-06-10 584 struct cfg80211_chan_def tdls_chandef;
061b82d2b Manikanta Pubbisetty 2018-06-26 585 atomic_t txqs_paused;
0fabfaafe Arik Nemtsov 2015-06-10 586
17741cdc2 Johannes Berg 2008-09-11 587 /* keep last! */
17741cdc2 Johannes Berg 2008-09-11 588 struct ieee80211_sta sta;
f0706e828 Jiri Benc 2007-05-05 @589 };
f0706e828 Jiri Benc 2007-05-05 590

:::::: The code at line 589 was first introduced by commit
:::::: f0706e828e96d0fa4e80c0d25aa98523f6d589a0 [MAC80211]: Add mac80211 wireless stack.

:::::: TO: Jiri Benc <[email protected]>
:::::: CC: David S. Miller <[email protected]>

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation


Attachments:
(No filename) (12.83 kB)
.config.gz (6.26 kB)
Download all attachments

2018-06-26 11:25:43

by Toke Høiland-Jørgensen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: add stop/start logic for software TXQs

Manikanta Pubbisetty <[email protected]> writes:

> We can still invoke netif stop/wake APIs when wake_tx_queue is
> implemented but this could lead to packet drops in network layer;
> adding stop/start logic for software TXQs in mac80211 instead makes
> more sense; the change proposed adds the same in mac80211.

I agree with the approach; having packets queued in mac80211 while the
queues are stopped also means that CoDel can react to them when they are
resumed again.


> + list_for_each_entry_rcu(sta, &local->sta_list, list) {
> + if (!atomic_read(&sta->txqs_paused))
> + continue;
> +
> + atomic_set(&sta->txqs_paused, 0);

I'm not terribly well-versed in the kernel atomics, but doesn't the
split of read and set kinda defeat the point of using them? Also, as
this is under RCU, why do you need an atomic in the first place?

-Toke

2018-06-29 07:58:03

by Johannes Berg

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: add stop/start logic for software TXQs

On Tue, 2018-06-26 at 18:01 +0530, Manikanta Pubbisetty wrote:
>
> Valid point, txqs_paused is set in ieee80211_tx_dequeue; I was thinking
> a case where tx_dequeue is called without rcu_read_lock but seems that
> is not the case. All drivers using wake_tx_queue seems are using
> rcu_read_lock before tx_dequeue; can there be a case where tx_dequeue is
> called without rcu_read_lock?

FWIW, the rcu_read_lock() isn't relevant at all - multiple threads can
well (and will for sure!) enter it.

johannes

2018-06-26 12:31:32

by Manikanta Pubbisetty

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: add stop/start logic for software TXQs


On 6/26/2018 4:55 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Manikanta Pubbisetty <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> We can still invoke netif stop/wake APIs when wake_tx_queue is
>> implemented but this could lead to packet drops in network layer;
>> adding stop/start logic for software TXQs in mac80211 instead makes
>> more sense; the change proposed adds the same in mac80211.
> I agree with the approach; having packets queued in mac80211 while the
> queues are stopped also means that CoDel can react to them when they are
> resumed again.

Agreed!!

>
>> + list_for_each_entry_rcu(sta, &local->sta_list, list) {
>> + if (!atomic_read(&sta->txqs_paused))
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + atomic_set(&sta->txqs_paused, 0);
> I'm not terribly well-versed in the kernel atomics, but doesn't the
> split of read and set kinda defeat the point of using them? Also, as
> this is under RCU, why do you need an atomic in the first place?
Valid point, txqs_paused is set in ieee80211_tx_dequeue; I was thinking
a case where tx_dequeue is called without rcu_read_lock but seems that
is not the case. All drivers using wake_tx_queue seems are using
rcu_read_lock before tx_dequeue; can there be a case where tx_dequeue is
called without rcu_read_lock?

Manikanta

2018-06-29 07:57:10

by Johannes Berg

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: add stop/start logic for software TXQs

On Tue, 2018-06-26 at 13:25 +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Manikanta Pubbisetty <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > We can still invoke netif stop/wake APIs when wake_tx_queue is
> > implemented but this could lead to packet drops in network layer;
> > adding stop/start logic for software TXQs in mac80211 instead makes
> > more sense; the change proposed adds the same in mac80211.
>
> I agree with the approach; having packets queued in mac80211 while the
> queues are stopped also means that CoDel can react to them when they are
> resumed again.
>
>
> > + list_for_each_entry_rcu(sta, &local->sta_list, list) {
> > + if (!atomic_read(&sta->txqs_paused))
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + atomic_set(&sta->txqs_paused, 0);
>
> I'm not terribly well-versed in the kernel atomics, but doesn't the
> split of read and set kinda defeat the point of using them? Also, as
> this is under RCU, why do you need an atomic in the first place?

RCU doesn't do any locking, but the usage of atomic_t is indeed rather
pointless since all you do is "atomic_set()" and "atomic_read()" - which
are actually not special at all, they're just writing/reading the
variable respectively! The only thing that's really special is
atomic_inc(), atomic_dec() and friends.

If you explain what you were trying to achieve here then we can probably
help you.

I'll also review the rest of the patch now, but I'll already note you
should fix the kernel-doc complaint from the kbuild test robot.

johannes

2018-06-27 12:28:23

by Toke Høiland-Jørgensen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: add stop/start logic for software TXQs

Manikanta Pubbisetty <[email protected]> writes:

> On 6/26/2018 4:55 PM, Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen wrote:
>> Manikanta Pubbisetty <[email protected]> writes:
>>
>>> We can still invoke netif stop/wake APIs when wake_tx_queue is
>>> implemented but this could lead to packet drops in network layer;
>>> adding stop/start logic for software TXQs in mac80211 instead makes
>>> more sense; the change proposed adds the same in mac80211.
>> I agree with the approach; having packets queued in mac80211 while the
>> queues are stopped also means that CoDel can react to them when they are
>> resumed again.
>
> Agreed!!
>
>>
>>> + list_for_each_entry_rcu(sta, &local->sta_list, list) {
>>> + if (!atomic_read(&sta->txqs_paused))
>>> + continue;
>>> +
>>> + atomic_set(&sta->txqs_paused, 0);
>> I'm not terribly well-versed in the kernel atomics, but doesn't the
>> split of read and set kinda defeat the point of using them? Also, as
>> this is under RCU, why do you need an atomic in the first place?
> Valid point, txqs_paused is set in ieee80211_tx_dequeue; I was thinking=20
> a case where tx_dequeue is called without rcu_read_lock but seems that=20
> is not the case. All drivers using wake_tx_queue seems are using=20
> rcu_read_lock before tx_dequeue; can there be a case where tx_dequeue is=
=20
> called without rcu_read_lock?

I'm pretty sure we would have other problems if there were... :)

-Toke

2018-07-03 09:45:21

by Johannes Berg

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: add stop/start logic for software TXQs

On Mon, 2018-07-02 at 14:48 +0530, Manikanta Pubbisetty wrote:
> >
> > > @@ -298,10 +354,15 @@ static void __ieee80211_wake_queue(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, int queue,
> > > if (local->q_stop_reasons[queue][reason] == 0)
> > > __clear_bit(reason, &local->queue_stop_reasons[queue]);
> > >
> > > + if (local->ops->wake_tx_queue)
> > > + __clear_bit(reason, &local->txqs_stopped);
> > > +
> > > if (local->queue_stop_reasons[queue] != 0)
> > > /* someone still has this queue stopped */
> > > return;
> > >
> > > + ieee80211_wake_txqs(local);
> >
> > I'm not sure this is the right place to hook in?
> >
> > This might interact really strangely with drivers - which also get here.
> > Perhaps we should make this conditional on reason != DRIVER?
>
> Good point! IMO the condition (reason != DRIVER) does not fit well; if
> the reason for stop queues is DRIVER then we don't get a chance to wake
> them again. May be deferring the wake_txqs by scheduling a tasklet
> should help?

Not sure what you mean? But I see what I said was also confusing.

What I meant is that we should just not allow the driver to stop the
TXQs this way - if it's a TXQ driver then it should just stop scheduling
if it needs to, it shouldn't continue scheduling and rely on us blocking
it.

We, for mac80211's purposes, need to stop, cannot influence scheduling
and want to unify it with the 'normal' queue stop - so my thought would
be that we should only set the TXQ to stopped if the reason isn't
DRIVER.

johannes

2018-07-02 09:18:40

by Manikanta Pubbisetty

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: add stop/start logic for software TXQs


>> + if (txq->sta) {
>> + sta = container_of(txq->sta, struct sta_info, sta);
>> + atomic_set(&sta->txqs_paused, 1);
>> + }
> It seems to me you could remove this - possibly at the expense of doing
> a little more work in ieee80211_wake_txqs()?

Atomic set on txqs_paused is done to avoid checking each txq for pause
condition in ieee80211_wake_txqs; In other words, we will walk through
the STA iTXQs only if sta->txqs_paused is set.
This minor optimization might be helpful when the sta_list is huge, no?

> Have you measured it and found it to be a problem?
>
> The atomic stuff here doesn't work the way you want it to though. In
> fact, even the lazy propagation doesn't work the way you want it to, I
> think!
>
> Thinking about it:
>
> CPU 1 CPU 2
> * you're disabling TX
> -> local->txqs_stopped = 1
> * check local->txqs_stopped
> * re-enable TX
> -> local->txqs_stopped = 0
> * call ieee80211_wake_txqs()
> check sta->txqs_paused
> * set txq->flags |= PAUSED
> * set sta->txqs_paused
>
> I don't see how you can prevent this right now? In
> ieee80211_tx_dequeue() you have the fq lock, but you're not taking it on
> the other side (in __ieee80211_stop_queue/__ieee80211_wake_queue).
>

You are right, we should take care of locking.

>> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sta->sta.txq); i++) {
>> + txqi = to_txq_info(sta->sta.txq[i]);
>> +
>> + if (!test_and_clear_bit(IEEE80211_TXQ_PAUSED,
>> + &txqi->flags))
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + drv_wake_tx_queue(local, txqi);
> Maybe that should be conditional on there being packets? Actually, no
> ... ok, the lazy setting helps you with this because it means that the
> driver wanted a packet but didn't get one, so now you should wake it. If
> it never wanted a packet, then you don't care about the state.
>
> Ok - so that means we need to keep the lazy setting, but fix the locking
> :-)

Correct!!

>> + /* Software interfaces like AP_VLAN, monitor do not have
>> + * vif specific queues.
>> + */
>> + if (!sdata->dev || !vif->txq)
>> + continue;
> Is there any way you can have vif->txq && !sdata->dev? It seems to me
> that no, and then you only need the vif->txq check?

Makes sense; we need not check for sdata->dev.

>> @@ -298,10 +354,15 @@ static void __ieee80211_wake_queue(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, int queue,
>> if (local->q_stop_reasons[queue][reason] == 0)
>> __clear_bit(reason, &local->queue_stop_reasons[queue]);
>>
>> + if (local->ops->wake_tx_queue)
>> + __clear_bit(reason, &local->txqs_stopped);
>> +
>> if (local->queue_stop_reasons[queue] != 0)
>> /* someone still has this queue stopped */
>> return;
>>
>> + ieee80211_wake_txqs(local);
> I'm not sure this is the right place to hook in?
>
> This might interact really strangely with drivers - which also get here.
> Perhaps we should make this conditional on reason != DRIVER?

Good point!  IMO the condition (reason != DRIVER) does not fit well; if
the reason for stop queues is DRIVER then we don't get a chance to wake
them again. May be deferring the wake_txqs by scheduling a tasklet
should help?

>
> Also, your bitmap setting should be different - it should be per queue?
> But then since "queue" here should basically be an AC for iTXQ drivers,
> I think you need to handle that properly.
>
> Right now you get bugs if you do
>
> stop_queue(0, reason=aggregation)
> stop_queue(1, reason=aggregation)
> wake_queue(0, reason=aggregation)
>
> -> TXQs will wake up because local->txqs_stopped is only stopping the
> reason, not the queue number.
>

Makes sense!!

> So to summarize:
> * overall the approach seems fine, and the lazy disabling is probably
> for the better, but
> * need to address locking issues with that, and
> * need to address the refcounting issues.

Sure Johannes!!

Thanks,
Manikanta

2018-07-02 09:35:02

by Manikanta Pubbisetty

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: add stop/start logic for software TXQs


> I'll also review the rest of the patch now, but I'll already note you
> should fix the kernel-doc complaint from the kbuild test robot.

Sure, I will take care of this in the next revision of the patch.

Thanks,
Manikanta