2017-10-09 01:30:14

by Jia-Ju Bai

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [BUG] ssb: Possible sleep-in-atomic bugs in ssb_pcmcia_read8

According to pcmcia.c, the driver may sleep under a spinlock.
The function call paths are:
ssb_pcmcia_read8 (acquire the spinlock)
select_core_and_segment
ssb_pcmcia_switch_segment
ssb_pcmcia_cfg_write
pcmcia_write_config_byte
pcmcia_access_config (drivers/pcmcia/pcmcia_resource.c)
mutex_lock --> may sleep

ssb_pcmcia_read8 (acquire the spinlock)
select_core_and_segment
ssb_pcmcia_switch_segment
sssb_pcmcia_cfg_read
pcmcia_read_config_byte
pcmcia_access_config (drivers/pcmcia/pcmcia_resource.c)
mutex_lock --> may sleep

A possible fix is to use spinlock instead of mutex lock in
pcmcia_access_config in drivers/pcmcia/pcmcia_resource.c.

These bugs are found by my static analysis tool and my code review.


Thanks,
Jia-Ju Bai


2017-10-21 09:43:37

by Michael Büsch

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [BUG] ssb: Possible sleep-in-atomic bugs in ssb_pcmcia_read8

On Mon, 9 Oct 2017 09:29:17 +0800
Jia-Ju Bai <[email protected]> wrote:

> According to pcmcia.c, the driver may sleep under a spinlock.
> The function call paths are:
> ssb_pcmcia_read8 (acquire the spinlock)
> select_core_and_segment
> ssb_pcmcia_switch_segment
> ssb_pcmcia_cfg_write
> pcmcia_write_config_byte
> pcmcia_access_config (drivers/pcmcia/pcmcia_resource.c)
> mutex_lock --> may sleep
>
> ssb_pcmcia_read8 (acquire the spinlock)
> select_core_and_segment
> ssb_pcmcia_switch_segment
> sssb_pcmcia_cfg_read
> pcmcia_read_config_byte
> pcmcia_access_config (drivers/pcmcia/pcmcia_resource.c)
> mutex_lock --> may sleep
>
> A possible fix is to use spinlock instead of mutex lock in
> pcmcia_access_config in drivers/pcmcia/pcmcia_resource.c.
>
> These bugs are found by my static analysis tool and my code review.



Thanks for scanning and your resulting bug notification.
I currently don't have the hardware at hand to develop and test a
proper fix for this.
That said, I'm not so sure anymore why bar_lock is a spinlock instead
of a mutex. It might be possible to convert this to mutex.

I will try to look into this.

--
Michael


Attachments:
(No filename) (833.00 B)
OpenPGP digital signature