This patch removes unneeded member (skbuff) from
ieee80211_ibss_add_sta() method in its declaration (in ieee80211_i.h)
and its callers (in rx.c and mlme.c)
(wireless-testing).
Signed-off-by: Rami Rosen <[email protected]>
diff --git a/net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h b/net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h
index 527205f..a3858e7 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h
+++ b/net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h
@@ -864,8 +864,7 @@ int ieee80211_sta_set_bssid(struct
ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata, u8 *bssid);
void ieee80211_sta_req_auth(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata,
struct ieee80211_if_sta *ifsta);
struct sta_info *ieee80211_ibss_add_sta(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata,
- struct sk_buff *skb, u8 *bssid,
- u8 *addr, u64 supp_rates);
+ u8 *bssid, u8 *addr, u64 supp_rates);
int ieee80211_sta_deauthenticate(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata,
u16 reason);
int ieee80211_sta_disassociate(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata,
u16 reason);
u32 ieee80211_reset_erp_info(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata);
diff --git a/net/mac80211/mlme.c b/net/mac80211/mlme.c
index 07b0cc3..98e03e3 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/mlme.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/mlme.c
@@ -1580,8 +1580,7 @@ static void ieee80211_rx_bss_info(struct
ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata,
(unsigned long long) sta->sta.supp_rates[band]);
#endif
} else {
- ieee80211_ibss_add_sta(sdata, NULL, mgmt->bssid,
- mgmt->sa, supp_rates);
+ ieee80211_ibss_add_sta(sdata, mgmt->bssid, mgmt->sa, supp_rates);
}
rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -1654,9 +1653,7 @@ static void ieee80211_rx_bss_info(struct
ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata,
sdata->dev->name, print_mac(mac, mgmt->bssid));
#endif
ieee80211_sta_join_ibss(sdata, &sdata->u.sta, bss);
- ieee80211_ibss_add_sta(sdata, NULL,
- mgmt->bssid, mgmt->sa,
- supp_rates);
+ ieee80211_ibss_add_sta(sdata, mgmt->bssid, mgmt->sa, supp_rates);
}
}
@@ -2399,8 +2396,7 @@ void ieee80211_sta_setup_sdata(struct
ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata)
* must be callable in atomic context.
*/
struct sta_info *ieee80211_ibss_add_sta(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata,
- struct sk_buff *skb, u8 *bssid,
- u8 *addr, u64 supp_rates)
+ u8 *bssid,u8 *addr, u64 supp_rates)
{
struct ieee80211_local *local = sdata->local;
struct sta_info *sta;
diff --git a/net/mac80211/rx.c b/net/mac80211/rx.c
index 59f356a..3d931a8 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/rx.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/rx.c
@@ -1864,9 +1864,8 @@ static int prepare_for_handlers(struct
ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata,
return 0;
rx->flags &= ~IEEE80211_RX_RA_MATCH;
} else if (!rx->sta)
- rx->sta = ieee80211_ibss_add_sta(sdata, rx->skb,
- bssid, hdr->addr2,
- BIT(rx->status->rate_idx));
+ rx->sta = ieee80211_ibss_add_sta(sdata, bssid, hdr->addr2,
+ BIT(rx->status->rate_idx));
break;
case NL80211_IFTYPE_MESH_POINT:
if (!multicast &&
On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 14:00 +0200, Rami Rosen wrote:
> - rx->sta = ieee80211_ibss_add_sta(sdata, rx->skb,
> - bssid, hdr->addr2,
> - BIT(rx->status->rate_idx));
> + rx->sta = ieee80211_ibss_add_sta(sdata, bssid, hdr->addr2,
> + BIT(rx->status->rate_idx));
Unrelated to this patch (it's good), shouldn't we take into account the
mandatory rate set here? If, for instance, we're receiving an 11MBit
frame then we can be sure the sender supports 1 and 11, and if we're
receiving a 48 MBit frame then we know already it supports [1, 2, 5.5,
11 if 2.4 GHz], 6, 12, 24 and 48.
johannes