The value of last_rate in ieee80211_sta_rx_stats is degraded from u32 to
u16 after being assigned to rate variable, which causes information loss
in STA_STATS_FIELD_TYPE and later bitfields.
Signed-off-by: Shayne Chen <[email protected]>
---
net/mac80211/sta_info.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/mac80211/sta_info.c b/net/mac80211/sta_info.c
index 27c737fe7fb8..bd532d3f925d 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/sta_info.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/sta_info.c
@@ -2418,7 +2418,7 @@ static void sta_stats_decode_rate(struct ieee80211_local *local, u32 rate,
static int sta_set_rate_info_rx(struct sta_info *sta, struct rate_info *rinfo)
{
- u16 rate = READ_ONCE(sta_get_last_rx_stats(sta)->last_rate);
+ u32 rate = READ_ONCE(sta_get_last_rx_stats(sta)->last_rate);
if (rate == STA_STATS_RATE_INVALID)
return -EINVAL;
--
2.25.1
Il 09/02/23 12:06, Shayne Chen ha scritto:
> The value of last_rate in ieee80211_sta_rx_stats is degraded from u32 to
> u16 after being assigned to rate variable, which causes information loss
> in STA_STATS_FIELD_TYPE and later bitfields.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shayne Chen <[email protected]>
In struct ieee80211_sta_rx_stats, `last_rate` is u32, hence this local `rate`
must be u32, or information loss may happen. Agreed.
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <[email protected]>
P.S.: Sorry for sending twice, the first one got out of the wrong mailbox.
> ---
> net/mac80211/sta_info.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/mac80211/sta_info.c b/net/mac80211/sta_info.c
> index 27c737fe7fb8..bd532d3f925d 100644
> --- a/net/mac80211/sta_info.c
> +++ b/net/mac80211/sta_info.c
> @@ -2418,7 +2418,7 @@ static void sta_stats_decode_rate(struct ieee80211_local *local, u32 rate,
>
> static int sta_set_rate_info_rx(struct sta_info *sta, struct rate_info *rinfo)
> {
> - u16 rate = READ_ONCE(sta_get_last_rx_stats(sta)->last_rate);
> + u32 rate = READ_ONCE(sta_get_last_rx_stats(sta)->last_rate);
>
> if (rate == STA_STATS_RATE_INVALID)
> return -EINVAL;
>
Il 09/02/23 12:06, Shayne Chen ha scritto:
> The value of last_rate in ieee80211_sta_rx_stats is degraded from u32 to
> u16 after being assigned to rate variable, which causes information loss
> in STA_STATS_FIELD_TYPE and later bitfields.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shayne Chen <[email protected]>
In struct ieee80211_sta_rx_stats, `last_rate` is u32, hence this local `rate`
must be u32, or information loss may happen. Agreed.
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <[email protected]>
> ---
> net/mac80211/sta_info.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/mac80211/sta_info.c b/net/mac80211/sta_info.c
> index 27c737fe7fb8..bd532d3f925d 100644
> --- a/net/mac80211/sta_info.c
> +++ b/net/mac80211/sta_info.c
> @@ -2418,7 +2418,7 @@ static void sta_stats_decode_rate(struct ieee80211_local *local, u32 rate,
>
> static int sta_set_rate_info_rx(struct sta_info *sta, struct rate_info *rinfo)
> {
> - u16 rate = READ_ONCE(sta_get_last_rx_stats(sta)->last_rate);
> + u32 rate = READ_ONCE(sta_get_last_rx_stats(sta)->last_rate);
>
> if (rate == STA_STATS_RATE_INVALID)
> return -EINVAL;
>