I'm testing to transmit frame with 802.1q tag (VLAN).
My client is set in STA + WDS and the netdev is bridged with
eth0.
I have a computer with vlan configuration set connected to the
STA eth0.
If I try to transmit frames with 802.1q tag, the frames are not
sent.
I checked with wireless sniffer, and I don't see the frame with
VLAN tag (the frames without VLAN tag are sent).
I tested with firmware 10.2.4.70.14-2 from kale github,
10.1.467-ct-com-full-015 from candelatech and 10.2.4.70-2 from openwrt,
and in all cases I have the same issue.
Thanks for your help.
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De?: Ben Greear [mailto:[email protected]]
> Envoy??: mercredi 9 d?cembre 2015 16:34
> ??: Cedric VONCKEN; [email protected]; linux-wireless
> Objet?: Re: ATH10K VLAN firmware issue
>
> This only happens when you use STA + WDS, or is .1q broken for you in
> other cases as well?
No, this issue occurs in all modes (STA, STA + WDS, AP).
Thanks
Cedric.
>
> Thanks,
> Ben
>
> On 12/08/2015 06:29 AM, Cedric VONCKEN wrote:
> > I'm testing to transmit frame with 802.1q tag (VLAN).
> >
> > My client is set in STA + WDS and the netdev is bridged with eth0.
> > I have a computer with vlan configuration set connected to the STA
> > eth0.
> >
> > If I try to transmit frames with 802.1q tag, the frames are not
sent.
> > I checked with wireless sniffer, and I don't see the frame with VLAN
> > tag (the frames without VLAN tag are sent).
> >
> > I tested with firmware 10.2.4.70.14-2 from kale github,
> > 10.1.467-ct-com-full-015 from candelatech and 10.2.4.70-2 from
> > openwrt, and in all cases I have the same issue.
> >
> > Thanks for your help.
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> > linux-wireless" in the body of a message to [email protected]
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
>
> --
> Ben Greear <[email protected]>
> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
This only happens when you use STA + WDS, or is .1q broken
for you in other cases as well?
Thanks,
Ben
On 12/08/2015 06:29 AM, Cedric VONCKEN wrote:
> I'm testing to transmit frame with 802.1q tag (VLAN).
>
> My client is set in STA + WDS and the netdev is bridged with
> eth0.
> I have a computer with vlan configuration set connected to the
> STA eth0.
>
> If I try to transmit frames with 802.1q tag, the frames are not
> sent.
> I checked with wireless sniffer, and I don't see the frame with
> VLAN tag (the frames without VLAN tag are sent).
>
> I tested with firmware 10.2.4.70.14-2 from kale github,
> 10.1.467-ct-com-full-015 from candelatech and 10.2.4.70-2 from openwrt,
> and in all cases I have the same issue.
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
Ben Greear <[email protected]>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
Bruno Antunes <[email protected]> writes:
> On 7 November 2016 at 18:06, Valo, Kalle <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Bruno Antunes <[email protected]> writes:
>>
>>> On 4 November 2016 at 21:17, Valo, Kalle <[email protected]> wrote=
:
>>>
>>>> Can someone file a bug to bugzilla about this so that all the info is
>>>> properly stored? The more comprehensive the report is the better.
>>>>
>>>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/
>>>
>>> I will file a bug report.
>>
>> Thanks, it's good to store all in one place so that it's easier to find
>> the relevant info.
>
> Just file the bug with the ID 187241 - VLAN support in ATH10k Feel
> free to ask for adicional info. I did not mention any names in the bug
> report fell free to take credit if wanted.
Thanks. I'll report it to the firmware team, let's see what happens. If
there's more information which might help to fix this feel free to
update that to the bug report.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D187241
--=20
Kalle Valo=
Hi all,
Old thread but I think the issue is still present.
I'm running a setup with VLANs with WDS and ath10k cards.
To make it work both cards must be loaded in rawmode, AP
and Sta, and with no security.
I'm using a OpenWrt trunk r49941 and the most recent firmware,
10.2.4.70.58, from Kalle ath10k firmware tree.
Although it works the throughput is very bad.
Are there any alternatives to improve the throughput.
Best Regards,
Bruno
On 9 December 2015 at 17:24, voncken <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>> -----Message d'origine-----
>> De : Ben Greear [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Envoy=C3=A9 : mercredi 9 d=C3=A9cembre 2015 16:34
>> =C3=80 : Cedric VONCKEN; [email protected]; linux-wireless
>> Objet : Re: ATH10K VLAN firmware issue
>>
>> This only happens when you use STA + WDS, or is .1q broken for you in
>> other cases as well?
>
> No, this issue occurs in all modes (STA, STA + WDS, AP).
>
> Thanks
>
> Cedric.
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ben
>>
>> On 12/08/2015 06:29 AM, Cedric VONCKEN wrote:
>> > I'm testing to transmit frame with 802.1q tag (VLAN).
>> >
>> > My client is set in STA + WDS and the netdev is bridged with eth0.
>> > I have a computer with vlan configuration set connected to the STA
>> > eth0.
>> >
>> > If I try to transmit frames with 802.1q tag, the frames are not
> sent.
>> > I checked with wireless sniffer, and I don't see the frame with VL=
AN
>> > tag (the frames without VLAN tag are sent).
>> >
>> > I tested with firmware 10.2.4.70.14-2 from kale github,
>> > 10.1.467-ct-com-full-015 from candelatech and 10.2.4.70-2 from
>> > openwrt, and in all cases I have the same issue.
>> >
>> > Thanks for your help.
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
>> > linux-wireless" in the body of a message to [email protected]
>> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Ben Greear <[email protected]>
>> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless"=
in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 4 November 2016 at 21:17, Valo, Kalle <[email protected]> wrote:
> Bruno Antunes <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> Old thread but I think the issue is still present.
>>
>> I'm running a setup with VLANs with WDS and ath10k cards.
>>
>> To make it work both cards must be loaded in rawmode, AP
>> and Sta, and with no security.
>>
>> I'm using a OpenWrt trunk r49941 and the most recent firmware,
>> 10.2.4.70.58, from Kalle ath10k firmware tree.
>>
>> Although it works the throughput is very bad.
>> Are there any alternatives to improve the throughput.
>
> Can someone file a bug to bugzilla about this so that all the info is
> properly stored? The more comprehensive the report is the better.
>
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/
I will file a bug report.
But since it appears to be a firmware related issue
under what category can fill in the bug?
Thanks,
Bruno
>
> --
> Kalle Valo
On 7 November 2016 at 18:06, Valo, Kalle <[email protected]> wrote:
> Bruno Antunes <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> On 4 November 2016 at 21:17, Valo, Kalle <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Bruno Antunes <[email protected]> writes:
>>>
>>>> Old thread but I think the issue is still present.
>>>>
>>>> I'm running a setup with VLANs with WDS and ath10k cards.
>>>>
>>>> To make it work both cards must be loaded in rawmode, AP
>>>> and Sta, and with no security.
>>>>
>>>> I'm using a OpenWrt trunk r49941 and the most recent firmware,
>>>> 10.2.4.70.58, from Kalle ath10k firmware tree.
>>>>
>>>> Although it works the throughput is very bad.
>>>> Are there any alternatives to improve the throughput.
>>>
>>> Can someone file a bug to bugzilla about this so that all the info is
>>> properly stored? The more comprehensive the report is the better.
>>>
>>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/
>>
>> I will file a bug report.
>
> Thanks, it's good to store all in one place so that it's easier to find
> the relevant info.
Just file the bug with the ID 187241 - VLAN support in ATH10k
Feel free to ask for adicional info.
I did not mention any names in the bug report fell free to take credit
if wanted.
Regards,
Bruno
>
>> But since it appears to be a firmware related issue
>> under what category can fill in the bug?
>
> You can file it under Drivers/network-wireless, AFAIK we don't have any
> separate components for firmware bugs. Here's one example to follow:
>
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=186161
>
> --
> Kalle Valo
> _______________________________________________
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Bruno Antunes <[email protected]> writes:
> On 4 November 2016 at 21:17, Valo, Kalle <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Bruno Antunes <[email protected]> writes:
>>
>>> Old thread but I think the issue is still present.
>>>
>>> I'm running a setup with VLANs with WDS and ath10k cards.
>>>
>>> To make it work both cards must be loaded in rawmode, AP
>>> and Sta, and with no security.
>>>
>>> I'm using a OpenWrt trunk r49941 and the most recent firmware,
>>> 10.2.4.70.58, from Kalle ath10k firmware tree.
>>>
>>> Although it works the throughput is very bad.
>>> Are there any alternatives to improve the throughput.
>>
>> Can someone file a bug to bugzilla about this so that all the info is
>> properly stored? The more comprehensive the report is the better.
>>
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/
>
> I will file a bug report.
Thanks, it's good to store all in one place so that it's easier to find
the relevant info.
> But since it appears to be a firmware related issue
> under what category can fill in the bug?
You can file it under Drivers/network-wireless, AFAIK we don't have any
separate components for firmware bugs. Here's one example to follow:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D186161
--=20
Kalle Valo=
Bruno Antunes <[email protected]> writes:
> Old thread but I think the issue is still present.
>
> I'm running a setup with VLANs with WDS and ath10k cards.
>
> To make it work both cards must be loaded in rawmode, AP
> and Sta, and with no security.
>
> I'm using a OpenWrt trunk r49941 and the most recent firmware,
> 10.2.4.70.58, from Kalle ath10k firmware tree.
>
> Although it works the throughput is very bad.
> Are there any alternatives to improve the throughput.
Can someone file a bug to bugzilla about this so that all the info is
properly stored? The more comprehensive the report is the better.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/
--=20
Kalle Valo=
On 15 November 2016 at 13:43, Valo, Kalle <[email protected]> wrote:
> Bruno Antunes <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> On 7 November 2016 at 18:06, Valo, Kalle <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Bruno Antunes <[email protected]> writes:
>>>
>>>> On 4 November 2016 at 21:17, Valo, Kalle <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Can someone file a bug to bugzilla about this so that all the info is
>>>>> properly stored? The more comprehensive the report is the better.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/
>>>>
>>>> I will file a bug report.
>>>
>>> Thanks, it's good to store all in one place so that it's easier to find
>>> the relevant info.
>>
>> Just file the bug with the ID 187241 - VLAN support in ATH10k Feel
>> free to ask for adicional info. I did not mention any names in the bug
>> report fell free to take credit if wanted.
>
> Thanks. I'll report it to the firmware team, let's see what happens. If
> there's more information which might help to fix this feel free to
> update that to the bug report.
I'm finishing my tests and will update the bug report ASAP.
Turns out the bad throughput was the result of a failure in the switch port.
With Ben's firmware the VLAN support is working fine with security.
Thanks,
Bruno
>
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=187241
>
> --
> Kalle Valo
Thanks for your answer,
How I can know when this issue will be fixed in ath10k firmware
mainline?
Do you know if Qualcomm publish a release note for this firmware?
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De?: [email protected] [mailto:linux-wireless-
> [email protected]] De la part de Valo, Kalle
> Envoy??: mardi 21 f?vrier 2017 14:19
> ??: voncken
> Cc?: 'OpenWrt Development List'; 'linux-wireless';
> [email protected]
> Objet?: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ATH10K VLAN firmware issue
>
> voncken <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > Do you know if the firmware team planned to fix the VLAN issue on
> > ath10k firmware?
>
> I reported it forward only this week.
>
> --
> Kalle Valo
Kalle,
Do you know if the firmware team planned to fix the VLAN issue on ath10k
firmware?
Thanks for your help.
Cedric.
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De?: [email protected] [mailto:linux-wireless-
> [email protected]] De la part de Valo, Kalle
> Envoy??: mardi 15 novembre 2016 14:44
> ??: Bruno Antunes
> Cc?: OpenWrt Development List; linux-wireless; voncken;
> [email protected]
> Objet?: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ATH10K VLAN firmware issue
>
> Bruno Antunes <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > On 7 November 2016 at 18:06, Valo, Kalle <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> Bruno Antunes <[email protected]> writes:
> >>
> >>> On 4 November 2016 at 21:17, Valo, Kalle <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Can someone file a bug to bugzilla about this so that all the info
> >>>> is properly stored? The more comprehensive the report is the
> better.
> >>>>
> >>>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/
> >>>
> >>> I will file a bug report.
> >>
> >> Thanks, it's good to store all in one place so that it's easier to
> >> find the relevant info.
> >
> > Just file the bug with the ID 187241 - VLAN support in ATH10k Feel
> > free to ask for adicional info. I did not mention any names in the
> bug
> > report fell free to take credit if wanted.
>
> Thanks. I'll report it to the firmware team, let's see what happens. If
> there's more information which might help to fix this feel free to
> update that to the bug report.
>
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=187241
>
> --
> Kalle Valo
voncken <[email protected]> writes:
> Do you know if the firmware team planned to fix the VLAN issue on ath10k
> firmware?
I reported it forward only this week.
--=20
Kalle Valo=