Kasper Sandberg ([email protected])

Number of posts: 145 (0.09 per day)
First post: 2004-03-08 17:35:24
Last post: 2008-06-09 13:39:12

Date List Subject
2007-01-04 22:08:41 linux-kernel Re: BUG, 2.6.20-rc3 raid autodetection
2007-01-04 19:58:13 linux-kernel Re: BUG, 2.6.20-rc3 raid autodetection
2007-01-04 18:47:59 linux-kernel BUG, 2.6.20-rc3 raid autodetection
2006-12-13 08:05:41 linux-kernel Re: BUG? atleast >=2.6.19-rc5, x86 chroot on x86_64
2006-12-13 04:58:45 linux-kernel Re: BUG? atleast >=2.6.19-rc5, x86 chroot on x86_64
2006-12-06 22:19:19 linux-kernel Re: BUG? atleast >=2.6.19-rc5, x86 chroot on x86_64
2006-12-06 20:05:57 linux-kernel Re: BUG? atleast >=2.6.19-rc5, x86 chroot on x86_64
2006-12-06 16:06:35 linux-kernel Re: BUG? atleast >=2.6.19-rc5, x86 chroot on x86_64
2006-12-06 12:58:09 linux-kernel Re: BUG? atleast >=2.6.19-rc5, x86 chroot on x86_64
2006-12-06 00:11:37 linux-kernel Re: BUG? atleast >=2.6.19-rc5, x86 chroot on x86_64
2006-12-05 02:59:27 linux-kernel Re: BUG? atleast >=2.6.19-rc5, x86 chroot on x86_64
2006-12-05 02:36:16 linux-kernel Re: BUG? atleast >=2.6.19-rc5, x86 chroot on x86_64
2006-11-26 22:56:51 linux-kernel Re: BUG? atleast >=2.6.19-rc5, x86 chroot on x86_64| perhaps duplicate bug report?
2006-11-26 18:07:57 linux-kernel Re: BUG? atleast >=2.6.19-rc5, x86 chroot on x86_64| perhaps duplicate bug report?
2006-11-26 13:47:29 linux-kernel Re: BUG? atleast >=2.6.19-rc5, x86 chroot on x86_64
2006-11-22 14:29:12 linux-kernel BUG? atleast >=2.6.19-rc5, x86 chroot on x86_64
2006-10-16 09:40:05 linux-kernel Re: Driver model.. expel legacy drivers?
2006-10-02 00:42:13 linux-kernel Re: Spam, bogofilter, etc
2006-08-30 08:14:47 linux-kernel Re: Linux v2.6.18-rc5
2006-08-28 10:31:14 linux-kernel Re: Possible gpl problem?
2006-08-28 10:28:06 linux-kernel Re: Linux v2.6.18-rc5
2006-08-11 17:43:10 linux-kernel Re: linux-2.4.33 released
2006-05-21 18:56:34 linux-kernel Re: Linux Kernel Source Compression
2006-05-06 02:08:37 linux-kernel Re: promise 20268 dma lockups with 2.4 & 2.6
2006-05-02 15:09:46 linux-kernel Re: [BUG] ACPI bug in 2.6.17-rc3
2006-05-02 06:02:20 linux-kernel [BUG] ACPI bug in 2.6.17-rc3
2006-03-10 04:53:06 linux-kernel Re: [Suspend2-announce] Nigel's work and the future of Suspend2.
2006-03-09 14:55:38 linux-kernel Re: [Suspend2-announce] Nigel's work and the future of Suspend2.
2006-03-09 11:33:09 linux-kernel Re: [Suspend2-announce] Nigel's work and the future of Suspend2.
2006-03-03 20:04:39 linux-kernel Re: [Announce] Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG Network Connection
2006-01-09 13:36:25 linux-kernel Re: Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time
2006-01-09 13:30:19 linux-kernel Re: Kernel Education
2005-12-28 19:32:30 linux-kernel Re: ati X300 support?
2005-12-16 17:17:31 linux-kernel RE: Re: gtkpod and Filesystem
2005-12-12 21:11:46 linux-kernel Re: Kernel BUG at arch/x86_64/mm/pageattr.c:154
2005-12-12 16:53:29 linux-kernel Kernel BUG at arch/x86_64/mm/pageattr.c:154
2005-12-08 17:13:34 linux-kernel Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
2005-12-08 16:55:47 linux-kernel Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
2005-12-08 01:05:05 linux-kernel Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
2005-12-08 00:59:07 linux-kernel Re: Linux in a binary world... a doomsday scenario
2005-12-02 20:54:58 linux-kernel Re: forcedeth
2005-12-01 22:57:32 linux-kernel Re: Linux 2.6.15-rc4
2005-12-01 18:57:56 linux-kernel Re: Linux 2.6.15-rc4
2005-12-01 14:05:05 linux-kernel Re: Linux 2.6.15-rc4
2005-11-25 13:17:19 linux-kernel Re: ipw2200 in 2.6.15-rc2-git4 warns about improper NETDEV_TX_BUSY retcode
2005-11-23 09:04:17 linux-kernel Re: Linux 2.6.15-rc2
2005-11-22 21:29:06 linux-kernel Re: Christmas list for the kernel
2005-11-21 21:21:32 linux-kernel Bug in promise_new ide conteroller (was: Re: [BUG] PDC20268 crashing during DMA setup on stock Debian 2.6.12-1-powerpc)
2005-11-21 15:08:37 linux-kernel Re: what is our answer to ZFS?
2005-11-21 14:18:42 linux-kernel Re: what is our answer to ZFS?
2005-11-21 12:07:16 linux-kernel Re: what is our answer to ZFS?