Sergey S. Kostyliov ([email protected])

Number of posts: 29 (0.07 per day)
First post: 2007-10-28 19:55:24
Last post: 2009-01-12 07:38:10

Date	List	Subject
2014-02-03 15:34:03	linux-kernel	SysRQ via serial console doesn't work for VMWare guests
2014-01-14 13:30:38	linux-kernel	Re: Terrible performance of sequential O_DIRECT 4k writes in SAN environment. ~3 times slower then Solars 10 with the same HBA/Storage.
2014-01-10 18:14:34	linux-kernel	Re: Terrible performance of sequential O_DIRECT 4k writes in SAN environment. ~3 times slower then Solars 10 with the same HBA/Storage.
2014-01-10 14:32:56	linux-kernel	Re: Terrible performance of sequential O_DIRECT 4k writes in SAN environment. ~3 times slower then Solars 10 with the same HBA/Storage.
2014-01-10 10:36:48	linux-kernel	Re: Terrible performance of sequential O_DIRECT 4k writes in SAN environment. ~3 times slower then Solars 10 with the same HBA/Storage.
2014-01-09 21:44:20	linux-kernel	Re: Terrible performance of sequential O_DIRECT 4k writes in SAN environment. ~3 times slower then Solars 10 with the same HBA/Storage.
2014-01-09 21:27:15	linux-kernel	Re: Terrible performance of sequential O_DIRECT 4k writes in SAN environment. ~3 times slower then Solars 10 with the same HBA/Storage.
2014-01-09 10:11:48	linux-kernel	Re: Terrible performance of sequential O_DIRECT 4k writes in SAN environment. ~3 times slower then Solars 10 with the same HBA/Storage.
2014-01-08 17:31:03	linux-kernel	Re: Terrible performance of sequential O_DIRECT 4k writes in SAN environment. ~3 times slower then Solars 10 with the same HBA/Storage.
2014-01-08 14:43:33	linux-kernel	Re: Terrible performance of sequential O_DIRECT 4k writes in SAN environment. ~3 times slower then Solars 10 with the same HBA/Storage.
2014-01-08 13:58:23	linux-kernel	Re: Terrible performance of sequential O_DIRECT 4k writes in SAN environment. ~3 times slower then Solars 10 with the same HBA/Storage.
2014-01-07 18:37:55	linux-kernel	Re: Terrible performance of sequential O_DIRECT 4k writes in SAN environment. ~3 times slower then Solars 10 with the same HBA/Storage.
2014-01-07 09:13:53	linux-kernel	Re: Terrible performance of sequential O_DIRECT 4k writes in SAN environment. ~3 times slower then Solars 10 with the same HBA/Storage.
2014-01-06 13:16:49	linux-kernel	Re: Terrible performance of sequential O_DIRECT 4k writes in SAN environment. ~3 times slower then Solars 10 with the same HBA/Storage.
2014-01-06 09:38:39	linux-kernel	Terrible performance of sequential O_DIRECT 4k writes in SAN environment. ~3 times slower then Solars 10 with the same HBA/Storage.
2013-06-30 09:05:36	linux-kernel	Re: Linux 3.9.8
2013-06-29 23:53:22	linux-kernel	Re: Linux 3.10-rc7
2013-06-29 21:08:13	linux-kernel	Re: Linux 3.10-rc7
2013-06-29 20:58:31	linux-kernel	Re: Linux 3.9.8
2013-06-29 20:55:59	linux-kernel	Re: Linux 3.7.8
2013-06-29 20:50:38	linux-kernel	Re: Linux 3.7.8
2013-06-29 15:05:44	linux-kernel	Re: Linux 3.10-rc7
2013-06-10 19:01:04	linux-kernel	Re: 3.10-rc4: mtrr_cleanup: can not find optimal value, please specify mtrr_gran_size/mtrr_chunk_size
2013-06-10 18:00:47	linux-kernel	Re: 3.10-rc4: mtrr_cleanup: can not find optimal value, please specify mtrr_gran_size/mtrr_chunk_size
2013-06-10 10:56:05	linux-kernel	Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86, range: Do not add new blank slot with add_range_with_merge
2013-06-10 10:01:44	linux-kernel	Re: 3.10-rc4: mtrr_cleanup: can not find optimal value, please specify mtrr_gran_size/mtrr_chunk_size
2009-01-12 07:38:27	linux-kernel	ath5k related kernel panic in 2.6.29-rc1
2009-01-12 07:38:10	linux-wireless	ath5k related kernel panic in 2.6.29-rc1
2007-10-28 19:55:24	linux-kernel	2.6.24-rc1 kills onboard r8169 (rtl8111b) NIC