Ben Nizette ([email protected])

Number of posts: 130 (0.87 per day)
First post: 2008-01-23 11:59:20
Last post: 2008-06-21 01:03:33

Previous Page / Next Page
Date List Subject
2009-06-17 09:37:43 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH v2] gpiolib: Add gpio_debounce and gpio_alt_func features to GPIOLIB
2009-06-06 06:52:36 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: allow poll on gpio value
2009-06-06 03:54:28 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: allow poll on gpio value
2009-06-06 03:52:18 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: add gpio_request/free_irq
2009-06-06 03:47:39 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: allow poll on gpio value
2009-04-20 03:14:19 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] favr32: improve touchscreen response
2009-04-20 02:07:01 linux-kernel [PATCH] ads7846: Allow both-edge interrupt mode
2009-04-17 09:12:22 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] macb: Kconfig net device compat fixup
2009-04-17 07:24:50 linux-kernel [PATCH] macb: Kconfig net device compat fixup
2009-04-16 05:57:51 linux-kernel [PATCH 9/9] omap mmc host: Use disable_irq_nosync() from within irq handlers.
2009-04-16 05:57:34 linux-kernel [PATCH 8/9] pcf50633: Use disable_irq_nosync() from within irq handlers.
2009-04-16 05:57:18 linux-kernel [PATCH] rtc-ds1305: Use disable_irq_nosync() from within irq handlers.
2009-04-16 05:56:54 linux-kernel [PATCH 6/9] ucb1400: Use disable_irq_nosync() from within irq handlers.
2009-04-16 05:56:38 linux-kernel [PATCH 5/9] tsc2007: Use disable_irq_nosync() from within irq handlers.
2009-04-16 05:56:21 linux-kernel [PATCH 4/9] sa1111ps2: Use disable_irq_nosync() from within irq handlers.
2009-04-16 05:55:56 linux-kernel [PATCH 3/9] omap-keypad: Use disable_irq_nosync() from within irq handlers.
2009-04-16 05:55:37 linux-kernel [PATCH 2/9] pxa25x_udc: Use disable_irq_nosync() from within irq handlers.
2009-04-16 05:55:10 linux-kernel [PATCH 1/9] ipu_idmac: Use disable_irq_nosync() from within irq handlers.
2009-04-16 05:54:48 linux-kernel [PATCH 0/9] Fix unsafe disable_irq usage
2009-04-16 00:42:36 linux-kernel [PATCH] ads7846: fix unsafe disable_irq (was [REGRESSION] threaded interrupt handler support breaks (some) irq handling on AVR32)
2009-04-15 01:31:29 linux-kernel Re: [REGRESSION] threaded interrupt handler support breaks (some) irq handling on AVR32
2009-04-14 08:37:41 linux-kernel Re: [REGRESSION] threaded interrupt handler support breaks (some) irq handling on AVR32
2009-04-14 05:47:24 linux-kernel [REGRESSION] threaded interrupt handler support breaks (some) irq handling on AVR32
2009-03-22 06:25:42 linux-kernel Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] GPIO switch framework
2009-01-15 21:45:51 linux-kernel [PATCH] atmel_pcm: Remove non-existant header
2009-01-12 22:26:28 linux-kernel Re: How to access a regular file from within a module ?
2009-01-07 01:53:05 linux-kernel Re: [RFC 2.6.27 1/1] gpiolib: add support for batch set of pins
2009-01-01 08:22:20 linux-kernel [PATCH] avr32: Remove DMATEST from defconfigs
2008-12-28 22:10:42 linux-kernel Re: [RFC 2.6.27 1/1] gpiolib: add support for batch set of pins
2008-10-27 22:18:05 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND] gpiolib: Add pin change notification
2008-10-24 00:28:45 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND] gpiolib: Add pin change notification
2008-10-20 22:50:28 linux-kernel [PATCH v2 RESEND] gpiolib: Add pin change notification
2008-10-10 06:18:20 linux-kernel [PATCH v2] gpiolib: Add pin change notification
2008-08-22 05:44:08 linux-kernel Re: Compiling the kernel with VMware
2008-07-25 00:42:21 linux-kernel [REGRESSION] PAGE_ALIGN(): correctly handle ... breaks AVR32 build
2008-07-18 06:48:23 linux-kernel [PATCH] avr32: clean up mci platform code
2008-07-15 05:31:12 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] Add SPI over GPIO driver
2008-07-15 05:07:03 linux-kernel Re: [PATCH] Add dynamic MMC-over-SPI-GPIO driver
2008-06-28 08:34:40 linux-kernel Re: [lm-sensors] Accelerometer etc subsystem (Update on progress)
2008-06-27 03:29:30 linux-kernel Re: Accelerometer etc subsystem (Update on progress)
2008-06-25 06:28:41 linux-kernel [PATCH][RFC] gpiolib: async notification of gpio events
2008-06-21 11:44:37 linux-kernel Re: [RFC PATCHES] Re: Is configfs the right solution for configuration based fs?
2008-06-21 11:44:26 linux-wireless Re: [RFC PATCHES] Re: Is configfs the right solution for configuration based fs?
2008-06-21 08:03:49 linux-kernel Re: [RFC PATCHES] Re: Is configfs the right solution for configuration based fs?
2008-06-21 08:03:27 linux-wireless Re: [RFC PATCHES] Re: Is configfs the right solution for configuration based fs?
2008-06-21 01:03:45 linux-kernel Re: [RFC PATCHES] Re: Is configfs the right solution for configuration based fs?
2008-06-21 01:03:33 linux-wireless Re: [RFC PATCHES] Re: Is configfs the right solution for configuration based fs?
2008-06-20 09:22:58 linux-kernel Re: [RFC PATCHES] Re: Is configfs the right solution for configuration based fs?
2008-06-20 09:22:45 linux-wireless Re: [RFC PATCHES] Re: Is configfs the right solution for configuration based fs?
2008-06-20 06:19:15 linux-kernel Re: [RFC PATCHES] Re: Is configfs the right solution for configuration based fs?
2008-06-20 06:18:58 linux-wireless Re: [RFC PATCHES] Re: Is configfs the right solution for configuration based fs?