Larry McVoy ([email protected])

Number of posts: 1136 (0.22 per day)
First post: 1998-12-07 21:20:45
Last post: 2012-10-13 02:30:03

Date	List	Subject
2002-11-01 16:26:21	linux-kernel	Re: What's left over.
2002-10-31 16:13:17	linux-kernel	Is your idea good? [was: Re: LTT for inclusion into 2.5]
2002-10-30 04:04:49	linux-kernel	Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: Squashfs released (a highly compressed filesystem)
2002-10-27 02:25:08	linux-kernel	bkbits cleanups
2002-10-24 15:03:07	linux-kernel	bkbits.net crashed
2002-10-22 17:38:53	linux-kernel	Re: Listmaster request: Do not blacklist [email protected]
2002-10-22 14:54:34	linux-kernel	Re: Listmaster request: Do not blacklist [email protected]
2002-10-22 02:25:48	linux-kernel	Re: Listmaster request: Do not blacklist [email protected]
2002-10-22 01:45:05	linux-kernel	Re: Listmaster request: Blacklist [email protected]
2002-10-21 15:02:33	linux-kernel	Re: Bitkeeper outrage, old and new
2002-10-21 02:36:30	linux-kernel	Re: Bitkeeper outrage, old and new
2002-10-19 23:06:03	linux-kernel	Re: Bitkeeper outrage, old and new
2002-10-14 00:12:55	linux-kernel	Re: Bitkeeper outragem, old and new
2002-10-10 18:55:54	linux-kernel	Re: BK is *evil* corporate software [was Re: New BK License Problem?]
2002-10-10 16:33:19	linux-kernel	Re: BK is *evil* corporate software [was Re: New BK License Problem?]
2002-10-10 14:22:37	linux-kernel	Re: A simple request (was Re: boring BK stats)
2002-10-10 13:30:56	linux-kernel	Re: BK is *evil* corporate software [was Re: New BK License Problem?]
2002-10-10 01:02:57	linux-kernel	Re: BK is *evil* corporate software
2002-10-09 23:49:22	linux-kernel	Re: BK is *evil* corporate software [was Re: New BK License Problem?]
2002-10-08 20:42:04	linux-kernel	Re: LMbench results for 2.5.40
2002-10-08 20:34:36	linux-kernel	Re: [PATCH] O_STREAMING - flag for optimal streaming I/O
2002-10-07 21:27:00	linux-kernel	Re: BK is *evil* corporate software [was Re: New BK License Problem?]
2002-10-07 17:37:30	linux-kernel	Re: New BK License Problem?
2002-10-07 17:29:54	linux-kernel	Re: New BK License Problem?
2002-10-07 16:12:32	linux-kernel	Re: New BK License Problem?
2002-10-07 14:56:00	linux-kernel	best version for server?
2002-10-07 14:45:08	linux-kernel	Re: New BK License Problem?
2002-10-07 06:23:55	linux-kernel	Re: New BK License Problem?
2002-10-07 06:02:20	linux-kernel	Re: BK MetaData License Problem?
2002-10-07 03:00:38	linux-kernel	bkbits.net down
2002-10-07 02:24:18	linux-kernel	Re: New BK License Problem?
2002-10-06 23:00:16	linux-kernel	Re: New BK License Problem?
2002-10-06 22:46:48	linux-kernel	Re: BK MetaData License Problem?
2002-10-06 22:43:45	linux-kernel	Re: BK MetaData License Problem?
2002-10-06 22:30:53	linux-kernel	Re: New BK License Problem?
2002-10-06 22:00:25	linux-kernel	Re: New BK License Problem?
2002-10-06 21:28:04	linux-kernel	Re: New BK License Problem?
2002-10-06 18:32:51	linux-kernel	Re: New BK License Problem?
2002-10-06 17:52:52	linux-kernel	Re: New BK License Problem?
2002-10-06 17:33:29	linux-kernel	Re: BK MetaData License Problem?
2002-10-06 16:19:10	linux-kernel	Re: BK MetaData License Problem?
2002-10-06 16:12:30	linux-kernel	BK license questions and answers
2002-10-06 15:09:41	linux-kernel	Re: New BK License Problem?
2002-10-06 14:50:56	linux-kernel	Re: New BK License Problem?
2002-10-06 14:47:32	linux-kernel	Re: New BK License Problem?
2002-10-06 13:58:16	linux-kernel	Re: New BK License Problem?
2002-10-06 05:18:31	linux-kernel	Re: New BK License Problem?
2002-10-06 00:48:58	linux-kernel	Re: New BK License Problem?
2002-10-06 00:39:59	linux-kernel	Re: New BK License Problem?
2002-10-06 00:25:24	linux-kernel	Re: New BK License Problem?
2002-10-05 23:47:42	linux-kernel	Re: New BK License Problem?