From: Alastair D'Silva <[email protected]>
On PowerPC, the address ranges allocated to OpenCAPI LPC memory
are allocated from firmware. These address ranges may be higher
than what older kernels permit, as we increased the maximum
permissable address in commit 4ffe713b7587
("powerpc/mm: Increase the max addressable memory to 2PB"). It is
possible that the addressable range may change again in the
future.
In this scenario, we end up with a bogus section returned from
__section_nr (see the discussion on the thread "mm: Trigger bug on
if a section is not found in __section_nr").
Adding a check here means that we fail early and have an
opportunity to handle the error gracefully, rather than rumbling
on and potentially accessing an incorrect section.
Further discussion is also on the thread ("powerpc: Perform a bounds
check in arch_add_memory")
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alastair D'Silva <[email protected]>
---
mm/memory_hotplug.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
index c73f09913165..5af9f4466ad1 100644
--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
+++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
@@ -278,6 +278,22 @@ static int check_pfn_span(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
return 0;
}
+static int check_hotplug_memory_addressable(unsigned long pfn,
+ unsigned long nr_pages)
+{
+ const u64 max_addr = PFN_PHYS(pfn + nr_pages) - 1;
+
+ if (max_addr >> MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS) {
+ const u64 max_allowed = (1ull << (MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS + 1)) - 1;
+ WARN(1,
+ "Hotplugged memory exceeds maximum addressable address, range=%#llx-%#llx, maximum=%#llx\n",
+ (u64)PFN_PHYS(pfn), max_addr, max_allowed);
+ return -E2BIG;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
/*
* Reasonably generic function for adding memory. It is
* expected that archs that support memory hotplug will
@@ -291,6 +307,10 @@ int __ref __add_pages(int nid, unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
unsigned long nr, start_sec, end_sec;
struct vmem_altmap *altmap = restrictions->altmap;
+ err = check_hotplug_memory_addressable(pfn, nr_pages);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
if (altmap) {
/*
* Validate altmap is within bounds of the total request
--
2.21.0
On 01.10.19 02:46, Alastair D'Silva wrote:
> From: Alastair D'Silva <[email protected]>
>
> On PowerPC, the address ranges allocated to OpenCAPI LPC memory
> are allocated from firmware. These address ranges may be higher
> than what older kernels permit, as we increased the maximum
> permissable address in commit 4ffe713b7587
> ("powerpc/mm: Increase the max addressable memory to 2PB"). It is
> possible that the addressable range may change again in the
> future.
>
> In this scenario, we end up with a bogus section returned from
> __section_nr (see the discussion on the thread "mm: Trigger bug on
> if a section is not found in __section_nr").
>
> Adding a check here means that we fail early and have an
> opportunity to handle the error gracefully, rather than rumbling
> on and potentially accessing an incorrect section.
>
> Further discussion is also on the thread ("powerpc: Perform a bounds
> check in arch_add_memory")
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
>
> Signed-off-by: Alastair D'Silva <[email protected]>
> ---
> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> index c73f09913165..5af9f4466ad1 100644
> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -278,6 +278,22 @@ static int check_pfn_span(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int check_hotplug_memory_addressable(unsigned long pfn,
> + unsigned long nr_pages)
> +{
> + const u64 max_addr = PFN_PHYS(pfn + nr_pages) - 1;
> +
> + if (max_addr >> MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS) {
> + const u64 max_allowed = (1ull << (MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS + 1)) - 1;
> + WARN(1,
> + "Hotplugged memory exceeds maximum addressable address, range=%#llx-%#llx, maximum=%#llx\n",
> + (u64)PFN_PHYS(pfn), max_addr, max_allowed);
> + return -E2BIG;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Reasonably generic function for adding memory. It is
> * expected that archs that support memory hotplug will
> @@ -291,6 +307,10 @@ int __ref __add_pages(int nid, unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
> unsigned long nr, start_sec, end_sec;
> struct vmem_altmap *altmap = restrictions->altmap;
>
> + err = check_hotplug_memory_addressable(pfn, nr_pages);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> if (altmap) {
> /*
> * Validate altmap is within bounds of the total request
>
I actually wanted to give my RB to v7, not v6 :)
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]>
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 11:49:47 +0200 David Hildenbrand <[email protected]> wrote:
> > @@ -278,6 +278,22 @@ static int check_pfn_span(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static int check_hotplug_memory_addressable(unsigned long pfn,
> > + unsigned long nr_pages)
> > +{
> > + const u64 max_addr = PFN_PHYS(pfn + nr_pages) - 1;
> > +
> > + if (max_addr >> MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS) {
> > + const u64 max_allowed = (1ull << (MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS + 1)) - 1;
> > + WARN(1,
> > + "Hotplugged memory exceeds maximum addressable address, range=%#llx-%#llx, maximum=%#llx\n",
> > + (u64)PFN_PHYS(pfn), max_addr, max_allowed);
> > + return -E2BIG;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > /*
> > * Reasonably generic function for adding memory. It is
> > * expected that archs that support memory hotplug will
> > @@ -291,6 +307,10 @@ int __ref __add_pages(int nid, unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
> > unsigned long nr, start_sec, end_sec;
> > struct vmem_altmap *altmap = restrictions->altmap;
> >
> > + err = check_hotplug_memory_addressable(pfn, nr_pages);
> > + if (err)
> > + return err;
> > +
> > if (altmap) {
> > /*
> > * Validate altmap is within bounds of the total request
> >
>
> I actually wanted to give my RB to v7, not v6 :)
>
Given that check_hotplug_memory_addressable() is now static, I'll
assume that the old [2/2]
mm-add-a-bounds-check-in-devm_memremap_pages.patch is now obsolete.
From: Alastair D'Silva <[email protected]>
Subject: mm/memremap.c: add a bounds check in devm_memremap_pages()
The call to check_hotplug_memory_addressable() validates that the memory
is fully addressable.
Without this call, it is possible that we may remap pages that is not
physically addressable, resulting in bogus section numbers being returned
from __section_nr().
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alastair D'Silva <[email protected]>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]>
Cc: Dan Williams <[email protected]>
Cc: Ira Weiny <[email protected]>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]>
Cc: Logan Gunthorpe <[email protected]>
Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <[email protected]>
Cc: Pavel Tatashin <[email protected]>
Cc: Qian Cai <[email protected]>
Cc: Wei Yang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
---
mm/memremap.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
--- a/mm/memremap.c~mm-add-a-bounds-check-in-devm_memremap_pages
+++ a/mm/memremap.c
@@ -185,6 +185,11 @@ void *memremap_pages(struct dev_pagemap
int error, is_ram;
bool need_devmap_managed = true;
+ error = check_hotplug_memory_addressable(res->start,
+ resource_size(res));
+ if (error)
+ return ERR_PTR(error);
+
switch (pgmap->type) {
case MEMORY_DEVICE_PRIVATE:
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEVICE_PRIVATE)) {
_
On Wed, 2019-10-02 at 15:14 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 11:49:47 +0200 David Hildenbrand <[email protected]
> > wrote:
>
> > > @@ -278,6 +278,22 @@ static int check_pfn_span(unsigned long pfn,
> > > unsigned long nr_pages,
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static int check_hotplug_memory_addressable(unsigned long pfn,
> > > + unsigned long nr_pages)
> > > +{
> > > + const u64 max_addr = PFN_PHYS(pfn + nr_pages) - 1;
> > > +
> > > + if (max_addr >> MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS) {
> > > + const u64 max_allowed = (1ull << (MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS +
> > > 1)) - 1;
> > > + WARN(1,
> > > + "Hotplugged memory exceeds maximum addressable
> > > address, range=%#llx-%#llx, maximum=%#llx\n",
> > > + (u64)PFN_PHYS(pfn), max_addr, max_allowed);
> > > + return -E2BIG;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > /*
> > > * Reasonably generic function for adding memory. It is
> > > * expected that archs that support memory hotplug will
> > > @@ -291,6 +307,10 @@ int __ref __add_pages(int nid, unsigned long
> > > pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
> > > unsigned long nr, start_sec, end_sec;
> > > struct vmem_altmap *altmap = restrictions->altmap;
> > >
> > > + err = check_hotplug_memory_addressable(pfn, nr_pages);
> > > + if (err)
> > > + return err;
> > > +
> > > if (altmap) {
> > > /*
> > > * Validate altmap is within bounds of the total
> > > request
> > >
> >
> > I actually wanted to give my RB to v7, not v6 :)
> >
>
> Given that check_hotplug_memory_addressable() is now static, I'll
> assume that the old [2/2]
> mm-add-a-bounds-check-in-devm_memremap_pages.patch is now obsolete.
>
Yes, please ignore that whole series.
> From: Alastair D'Silva <[email protected]>
> Subject: mm/memremap.c: add a bounds check in devm_memremap_pages()
>
> The call to check_hotplug_memory_addressable() validates that the
> memory
> is fully addressable.
>
> Without this call, it is possible that we may remap pages that is not
> physically addressable, resulting in bogus section numbers being
> returned
> from __section_nr().
>
> Link:
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lkml.kernel.org_r_20190917010752.28395-2D3-2Dalastair-40au1.ibm.com&d=DwICAg&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=cT4tgeEQ0Ll3SIlZDHE5AEXyKy6uKADMtf9_Eb7-vec&m=pVid6q3tQNfU2PQborLw8oYmNm9naF133dZ8AJ5lW9A&s=51ZuQa-kwRu8vW9vt5OgxjaIMWm4_n-aqp5xMSdkI4k&e=
>
> Signed-off-by: Alastair D'Silva <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]>
> Cc: Dan Williams <[email protected]>
> Cc: Ira Weiny <[email protected]>
> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]>
> Cc: Logan Gunthorpe <[email protected]>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
> Cc: Oscar Salvador <[email protected]>
> Cc: Pavel Tatashin <[email protected]>
> Cc: Qian Cai <[email protected]>
> Cc: Wei Yang <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> mm/memremap.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> --- a/mm/memremap.c~mm-add-a-bounds-check-in-devm_memremap_pages
> +++ a/mm/memremap.c
> @@ -185,6 +185,11 @@ void *memremap_pages(struct dev_pagemap
> int error, is_ram;
> bool need_devmap_managed = true;
>
> + error = check_hotplug_memory_addressable(res->start,
> + resource_size(res));
> + if (error)
> + return ERR_PTR(error);
> +
> switch (pgmap->type) {
> case MEMORY_DEVICE_PRIVATE:
> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEVICE_PRIVATE)) {
> _
>
--
Alastair D'Silva
Open Source Developer
Linux Technology Centre, IBM Australia
mob: 0423 762 819
On Tue 01-10-19 10:46:15, Alastair D'Silva wrote:
> From: Alastair D'Silva <[email protected]>
>
> On PowerPC, the address ranges allocated to OpenCAPI LPC memory
> are allocated from firmware. These address ranges may be higher
> than what older kernels permit, as we increased the maximum
> permissable address in commit 4ffe713b7587
> ("powerpc/mm: Increase the max addressable memory to 2PB"). It is
> possible that the addressable range may change again in the
> future.
>
> In this scenario, we end up with a bogus section returned from
> __section_nr (see the discussion on the thread "mm: Trigger bug on
> if a section is not found in __section_nr").
>
> Adding a check here means that we fail early and have an
> opportunity to handle the error gracefully, rather than rumbling
> on and potentially accessing an incorrect section.
>
> Further discussion is also on the thread ("powerpc: Perform a bounds
> check in arch_add_memory")
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
>
> Signed-off-by: Alastair D'Silva <[email protected]>
I am sorry to come late to the party. This looks better.
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
Thanks!
> ---
> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> index c73f09913165..5af9f4466ad1 100644
> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -278,6 +278,22 @@ static int check_pfn_span(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int check_hotplug_memory_addressable(unsigned long pfn,
> + unsigned long nr_pages)
> +{
> + const u64 max_addr = PFN_PHYS(pfn + nr_pages) - 1;
> +
> + if (max_addr >> MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS) {
> + const u64 max_allowed = (1ull << (MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS + 1)) - 1;
> + WARN(1,
> + "Hotplugged memory exceeds maximum addressable address, range=%#llx-%#llx, maximum=%#llx\n",
> + (u64)PFN_PHYS(pfn), max_addr, max_allowed);
> + return -E2BIG;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Reasonably generic function for adding memory. It is
> * expected that archs that support memory hotplug will
> @@ -291,6 +307,10 @@ int __ref __add_pages(int nid, unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
> unsigned long nr, start_sec, end_sec;
> struct vmem_altmap *altmap = restrictions->altmap;
>
> + err = check_hotplug_memory_addressable(pfn, nr_pages);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> if (altmap) {
> /*
> * Validate altmap is within bounds of the total request
> --
> 2.21.0
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs