2005-05-03 02:37:27

by Hyok S. Choi

Subject: [Benchmark] Linux 2.6.11.6 ARM MMU mode vs. noMMU mode vs. MVista 2.4.20

FYI,

I just put an newer lmbench lat_ctx benchmark result chart,
among linux 2.6.11.6 noMMU mode vs. MMU mode vs. montavista
linux(2.4.20-mvista) at:
http://opensrc.sec.samsung.com/document/ctx-perf-linux-2.6.11.6.pdf

you can find some graphs also at :
http://opensrc.sec.samsung.com/document.html

Hyok

2005-05-13 08:36:39

by Wayne Lee

Subject: RE: [uClinux-dev] [Benchmark] Linux 2.6.11.6 ARM MMU mode vs. noMMU mode vs. MVista 2.4.20

Hello Hyok,

How can we reproduce your experiments on s3c24a0 ports?
Do you release the lmbench for s3c24a0?

Regards,
Wayne

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Hyok S. Choi
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 10:36 AM
To: uClinux development list; [email protected];
[email protected]
Cc: CE Linux Developers List
Subject: [uClinux-dev] [Benchmark] Linux 2.6.11.6 ARM MMU mode vs. noMMU
mode vs. MVista 2.4.20

FYI,

I just put an newer lmbench lat_ctx benchmark result chart,
among linux 2.6.11.6 noMMU mode vs. MMU mode vs. montavista
linux(2.4.20-mvista) at:
http://opensrc.sec.samsung.com/document/ctx-perf-linux-2.6.11.6.pdf

you can find some graphs also at :
http://opensrc.sec.samsung.com/document.html

Hyok



_______________________________________________
uClinux-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
This message was resent by [email protected]