2024-04-10 14:17:31

by Andy Shevchenko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/1] serial: max3100: Convert to_max3100_port() to be static inline

As Jiri rightfully pointed out the current to_max3100_port() macro
implementation is fragile in a sense that it expects the variable
name to be port, otherwise it blow up the build.

Change this to be static inline to prevent bad compilation.

Suggested-by: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
---
drivers/tty/serial/max3100.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/max3100.c b/drivers/tty/serial/max3100.c
index 1e6b5763ce3f..07ee001640bb 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/max3100.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/max3100.c
@@ -111,7 +111,10 @@ struct max3100_port {
struct timer_list timer;
};

-#define to_max3100_port(port) container_of(port, struct max3100_port, port)
+static inline struct max3100_port *to_max3100_port(struct uart_port *port)
+{
+ return container_of(port, struct max3100_port, port);
+}

static struct max3100_port *max3100s[MAX_MAX3100]; /* the chips */
static DEFINE_MUTEX(max3100s_lock); /* race on probe */
--
2.43.0.rc1.1.gbec44491f096



2024-04-10 14:20:29

by Greg Kroah-Hartman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] serial: max3100: Convert to_max3100_port() to be static inline

On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 05:11:35PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> As Jiri rightfully pointed out the current to_max3100_port() macro
> implementation is fragile in a sense that it expects the variable
> name to be port, otherwise it blow up the build.
>
> Change this to be static inline to prevent bad compilation.

Is there a problem today? If not, this line isn't needed, as it sounds
like you are fixing a problem here, when all you are doing is making it
"nicer", right?

> Suggested-by: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/tty/serial/max3100.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/max3100.c b/drivers/tty/serial/max3100.c
> index 1e6b5763ce3f..07ee001640bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/max3100.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/max3100.c
> @@ -111,7 +111,10 @@ struct max3100_port {
> struct timer_list timer;
> };
>
> -#define to_max3100_port(port) container_of(port, struct max3100_port, port)
> +static inline struct max3100_port *to_max3100_port(struct uart_port *port)
> +{
> + return container_of(port, struct max3100_port, port);

Note, the one reason you might want to do this as a #define is if you
use container_of_const() which has to be a #define. So the fact that
this was a define to start with is normal and not really a big deal.

thanks,

greg k-h

2024-04-10 14:29:58

by Andy Shevchenko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] serial: max3100: Convert to_max3100_port() to be static inline

On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 04:20:10PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 05:11:35PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > As Jiri rightfully pointed out the current to_max3100_port() macro
> > implementation is fragile in a sense that it expects the variable
> > name to be port, otherwise it blow up the build.
> >
> > Change this to be static inline to prevent bad compilation.
>
> Is there a problem today?

Nope. And if anyone tries to make it a problem it won't build, so
unlikely problematic code can ever be upstreamed.

> If not, this line isn't needed, as it sounds
> like you are fixing a problem here, when all you are doing is making it
> "nicer", right?

Correct.

..

> > -#define to_max3100_port(port) container_of(port, struct max3100_port, port)
> > +static inline struct max3100_port *to_max3100_port(struct uart_port *port)
> > +{
> > + return container_of(port, struct max3100_port, port);
>
> Note, the one reason you might want to do this as a #define is if you
> use container_of_const() which has to be a #define. So the fact that
> this was a define to start with is normal and not really a big deal.

Noted.

Thanks for review!

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



2024-04-11 14:34:36

by Ilpo Järvinen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] serial: max3100: Convert to_max3100_port() to be static inline

On Wed, 10 Apr 2024, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

> As Jiri rightfully pointed out the current to_max3100_port() macro
> implementation is fragile in a sense that it expects the variable
> name to be port, otherwise it blow up the build.
>
> Change this to be static inline to prevent bad compilation.
>
> Suggested-by: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/tty/serial/max3100.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/max3100.c b/drivers/tty/serial/max3100.c
> index 1e6b5763ce3f..07ee001640bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/max3100.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/max3100.c
> @@ -111,7 +111,10 @@ struct max3100_port {
> struct timer_list timer;
> };
>
> -#define to_max3100_port(port) container_of(port, struct max3100_port, port)
> +static inline struct max3100_port *to_max3100_port(struct uart_port *port)
> +{
> + return container_of(port, struct max3100_port, port);
> +}
>
> static struct max3100_port *max3100s[MAX_MAX3100]; /* the chips */
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(max3100s_lock); /* race on probe */
>

Reviewed-by: Ilpo J?rvinen <[email protected]>

It seems liteuart has the same trap.

--
i.