The subject just about says it.
What versions of 2.4.x and 2.5.x compile cleanly with
the new gcc 3.2 that is included in most recent releases
(in particular RH8.0)
The 2.4.18-14 kernel sources from RH have LOTS of patches,
and they (well the modules) still dont compile with their
own config file (sigh).
--
Reg.Clemens
[email protected]
On Tue, 2002-10-15 at 20:49, [email protected] wrote:
> The subject just about says it.
> What versions of 2.4.x and 2.5.x compile cleanly with
> the new gcc 3.2 that is included in most recent releases
> (in particular RH8.0)
>
> The 2.4.18-14 kernel sources from RH have LOTS of patches,
> and they (well the modules) still dont compile with their
> own config file (sigh).
they do if you remember to use make mrproper when you switch from smp to
up or back...
Hi,
2.4.19 compiled just fine with gcc 3.2 here -- still using RH 7.1,
though (however, AFAIK RH dropped that "use-my-tweaked-compiler" thing
and shipped vanilla gcc 3.2 with RH 8.0).
HTH,
Andre
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002 12:49:37 -0600
[email protected] wrote:
> The subject just about says it.
> What versions of 2.4.x and 2.5.x compile cleanly with
> the new gcc 3.2 that is included in most recent releases
> (in particular RH8.0)
>
> The 2.4.18-14 kernel sources from RH have LOTS of patches,
> and they (well the modules) still dont compile with their
> own config file (sigh).
>
>
> --
> Reg.Clemens
> [email protected]
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Andre Oliveira da Costa
[email protected] said:
> The subject just about says it.
> What versions of 2.4.x and 2.5.x compile cleanly with
> the new gcc 3.2 that is included in most recent releases
> (in particular RH8.0)
I've tried 2.4.19 and a bunch of 2.4.20-pre on RH rawhide and 8.0 (same
gcc), smooth sailing throughout; and also 2.5.x, 39 <= x or something like
that, with glitches mostly due to work in progress only.
> The 2.4.18-14 kernel sources from RH have LOTS of patches,
> and they (well the modules) still dont compile with their
> own config file (sigh).
Have you reported that at http://bugzilla.redhat.com? After triple-checking,
that is, I doubt it very much that RH builds their distribution kernels
with something other than the standard RH tools and configurations.
--
Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513
On Tue, 2002-10-15 at 19:49, [email protected] wrote:
> The subject just about says it.
> What versions of 2.4.x and 2.5.x compile cleanly with
> the new gcc 3.2 that is included in most recent releases
> (in particular RH8.0)
2.4.18/19/20.. are fine. 2.2 isnt really tested.
> The 2.4.18-14 kernel sources from RH have LOTS of patches,
> and they (well the modules) still dont compile with their
> own config file (sigh).
Works for everyone else 8)