Hi,
The bug causing problems with the evolution address book is fixed in
2.5.56. I don't know if it was fixed in 2.5.55 or 2.5.56 but it was
broken in 2.5.54.
This bug(#112) is listed as RESOLVED at bugme.osdl.org. Should it be
moved to CLOSED?
Also how would one find out what the resolution was at bugme.osdl.org?
Is there a pointer to patch or cset that I missed somewhere there?
Regards,
Shane
On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 13:16, Shane Shrybman wrote:
> The bug causing problems with the evolution address book is fixed in
> 2.5.56. I don't know if it was fixed in 2.5.55 or 2.5.56 but it was
> broken in 2.5.54.
It was fixed in 2.5.55.
It works for me now, too, without using a hacked ORBit.
> This bug(#112) is listed as RESOLVED at bugme.osdl.org. Should it be
> moved to CLOSED?
I guess so.
> Also how would one find out what the resolution was at bugme.osdl.org?
> Is there a pointer to patch or cset that I missed somewhere there?
Not sure if you can.
You can find the fix posted to lkml, though - Michael Meeks posted it.
It was a simple fix in the getpeername() code as we thought.
Robert Love
On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 13:47, Robert Love wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 13:16, Shane Shrybman wrote:
>
> > The bug causing problems with the evolution address book is fixed in
> > 2.5.56. I don't know if it was fixed in 2.5.55 or 2.5.56 but it was
> > broken in 2.5.54.
>
> It was fixed in 2.5.55.
>
> It works for me now, too, without using a hacked ORBit.
>
> > This bug(#112) is listed as RESOLVED at bugme.osdl.org. Should it be
> > moved to CLOSED?
>
> I guess so.
Ok, I will send a note to the bug owner.
>
> > Also how would one find out what the resolution was at bugme.osdl.org?
> > Is there a pointer to patch or cset that I missed somewhere there?
>
> Not sure if you can.
>
> You can find the fix posted to lkml, though - Michael Meeks posted it.
> It was a simple fix in the getpeername() code as we thought.
Ah yes I see it now, thanks.
>
> Robert Love
Shane