Hi there!
What do you think about this:
http://www.atstake.com/research/advisories/2003/atstake_etherleak_report.pdf
http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/412115
Are those padding bug's fixed in >=2.5.x/2.4.21?
Or isn't it that critical?
Regards,
Martin
--
MyExcuse:
spaghetti cable cause packet failure
Martin Zwickel <[email protected]>
Research & Development
TechnoTrend AG <http://www.technotrend.de>
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 17:24, Martin Zwickel wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> What do you think about this:
>
> http://www.atstake.com/research/advisories/2003/atstake_etherleak_report.pdf
> http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/412115
>
> Are those padding bug's fixed in >=2.5.x/2.4.21?
>
> Or isn't it that critical?
It was fixed in 2.4.x early 2.4.21-pre, and in 2.2.2x sometime I dont
really recall. It's also fixed in 2.5.x, according to linux.bkbits.net.
Most vendor kernels are fixed, too.
--
Cheers,
Andr? Tomt
> Are those padding bug's fixed in >=2.5.x/2.4.21?
I think fixes for most, if not all drivers were in mainline by 2.4.21-pre5.
John.