Subject: [PATCH] reiserfs: UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in direntry_create_vi

deh defined as an array of type __u16[], and issue is
triggered when it's trying to access an element at
index 1, which is out of bounds because the array
has only one element at index 0.

Reported-by: [email protected]
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e5bb9eb00a5a5ed2a9a2
Signed-off-by: Bragatheswaran Manickavel <[email protected]>
---
fs/reiserfs/item_ops.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/item_ops.c b/fs/reiserfs/item_ops.c
index 3a5a752d96c7..ccf547c5e8e1 100644
--- a/fs/reiserfs/item_ops.c
+++ b/fs/reiserfs/item_ops.c
@@ -484,7 +484,7 @@ static int direntry_create_vi(struct virtual_node *vn,
vn->vn_mode);
dir_u->entry_sizes[i] =
(j ? deh_location(&deh[j - 1]) : ih_item_len(vi->vi_ih)) -
- deh_location(&deh[j]) + DEH_SIZE;
+ deh_location(&deh[j - 1]) + DEH_SIZE;
}

size += (dir_u->entry_count * sizeof(short));
--
2.34.1


Subject: Re: [PATCH] reiserfs: UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in direntry_create_vi


On 26/10/23 18:26, Bragatheswaran Manickavel wrote:
> deh defined as an array of type __u16[], and issue is
> triggered when it's trying to access an element at
> index 1, which is out of bounds because the array
> has only one element at index 0.
>
> Reported-by: [email protected]
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e5bb9eb00a5a5ed2a9a2
> Signed-off-by: Bragatheswaran Manickavel <[email protected]>
> ---
> fs/reiserfs/item_ops.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/item_ops.c b/fs/reiserfs/item_ops.c
> index 3a5a752d96c7..ccf547c5e8e1 100644
> --- a/fs/reiserfs/item_ops.c
> +++ b/fs/reiserfs/item_ops.c
> @@ -484,7 +484,7 @@ static int direntry_create_vi(struct virtual_node *vn,
> vn->vn_mode);
> dir_u->entry_sizes[i] =
> (j ? deh_location(&deh[j - 1]) : ih_item_len(vi->vi_ih)) -
> - deh_location(&deh[j]) + DEH_SIZE;
> + deh_location(&deh[j - 1]) + DEH_SIZE;
> }
>
> size += (dir_u->entry_count * sizeof(short));

Could someone help in reviewing the changes. I see reiserfs was marked with
obsolete but still wanted to know whether this patch is correct and can be
taken (if possible)

Thanks,
Bragathe