From the analog waveform analysis result, SD/SDIO controller
of AST2600 cannot always work well with 200MHz. The upper bound
stable frequency for SD/SDIO controller is 100MHz. Thus, SDR50
supported bit, instead of SDR104, in capability 2 register
should be set in advance.
Signed-off-by: Chin-Ting Kuo <[email protected]>
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c
index 6e4e132903a6..c6eaeb02e3f9 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c
@@ -35,6 +35,8 @@
#define ASPEED_SDC_CAP1_1_8V (0 * 32 + 26)
/* SDIO{14,24} */
#define ASPEED_SDC_CAP2_SDR104 (1 * 32 + 1)
+/* SDIO{14,24} */
+#define ASPEED_SDC_CAP2_SDR50 (1 * 32 + 0)
struct aspeed_sdc {
struct clk *clk;
@@ -410,11 +412,17 @@ static int aspeed_sdhci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
sdhci_get_of_property(pdev);
if (of_property_read_bool(np, "mmc-hs200-1_8v") ||
+ of_property_read_bool(np, "sd-uhs-sdr50") ||
of_property_read_bool(np, "sd-uhs-sdr104")) {
aspeed_sdc_set_slot_capability(host, dev->parent, ASPEED_SDC_CAP1_1_8V,
true, slot);
}
+ if (of_property_read_bool(np, "sd-uhs-sdr50")) {
+ aspeed_sdc_set_slot_capability(host, dev->parent, ASPEED_SDC_CAP2_SDR50,
+ true, slot);
+ }
+
if (of_property_read_bool(np, "sd-uhs-sdr104")) {
aspeed_sdc_set_slot_capability(host, dev->parent, ASPEED_SDC_CAP2_SDR104,
true, slot);
--
2.17.1
Hi Chin-Ting,
Sorry for the delay in looking at your series.
On Wed, 22 Sep 2021, at 20:01, Chin-Ting Kuo wrote:
> From the analog waveform analysis result, SD/SDIO controller
> of AST2600 cannot always work well with 200MHz. The upper bound
> stable frequency for SD/SDIO controller is 100MHz. Thus, SDR50
> supported bit, instead of SDR104, in capability 2 register
> should be set in advance.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chin-Ting Kuo <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c
> b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c
> index 6e4e132903a6..c6eaeb02e3f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@
> #define ASPEED_SDC_CAP1_1_8V (0 * 32 + 26)
> /* SDIO{14,24} */
> #define ASPEED_SDC_CAP2_SDR104 (1 * 32 + 1)
> +/* SDIO{14,24} */
I don't think we need to duplicate this comment.
> +#define ASPEED_SDC_CAP2_SDR50 (1 * 32 + 0)
Can we keep the defines in increasing bit order (i.e. put
ASPEED_SDC_CAP2_SDR50 above ASPEED_SDC_CAP2_SDR104)?
>
> struct aspeed_sdc {
> struct clk *clk;
> @@ -410,11 +412,17 @@ static int aspeed_sdhci_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
> sdhci_get_of_property(pdev);
>
> if (of_property_read_bool(np, "mmc-hs200-1_8v") ||
> + of_property_read_bool(np, "sd-uhs-sdr50") ||
Minor formatting issue, but can you make sure all the conditions are
aligned vertically from the left?
> of_property_read_bool(np, "sd-uhs-sdr104")) {
> aspeed_sdc_set_slot_capability(host, dev->parent, ASPEED_SDC_CAP1_1_8V,
> true, slot);
> }
>
> + if (of_property_read_bool(np, "sd-uhs-sdr50")) {
> + aspeed_sdc_set_slot_capability(host, dev->parent, ASPEED_SDC_CAP2_SDR50,
> + true, slot);
> + }
> +
> if (of_property_read_bool(np, "sd-uhs-sdr104")) {
> aspeed_sdc_set_slot_capability(host, dev->parent, ASPEED_SDC_CAP2_SDR104,
> true, slot);
> --
> 2.17.1
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for the review.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Jeffery <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 8:31 AM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] sdhci: aspeed: Add SDR50 support
>
> Hi Chin-Ting,
>
> Sorry for the delay in looking at your series.
>
> On Wed, 22 Sep 2021, at 20:01, Chin-Ting Kuo wrote:
> > From the analog waveform analysis result, SD/SDIO controller of
> > AST2600 cannot always work well with 200MHz. The upper bound stable
> > frequency for SD/SDIO controller is 100MHz. Thus, SDR50 supported bit,
> > instead of SDR104, in capability 2 register should be set in advance.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chin-Ting Kuo <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c | 8 ++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c
> > b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c
> > index 6e4e132903a6..c6eaeb02e3f9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c
> > @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@
> > #define ASPEED_SDC_CAP1_1_8V (0 * 32 + 26)
> > /* SDIO{14,24} */
> > #define ASPEED_SDC_CAP2_SDR104 (1 * 32 + 1)
> > +/* SDIO{14,24} */
>
> I don't think we need to duplicate this comment.
Okay, it will be modified in the next patch version.
>
> > +#define ASPEED_SDC_CAP2_SDR50 (1 * 32 + 0)
>
> Can we keep the defines in increasing bit order (i.e. put
> ASPEED_SDC_CAP2_SDR50 above ASPEED_SDC_CAP2_SDR104)?
>
Okay.
> >
> > struct aspeed_sdc {
> > struct clk *clk;
> > @@ -410,11 +412,17 @@ static int aspeed_sdhci_probe(struct
> > platform_device *pdev)
> > sdhci_get_of_property(pdev);
> >
> > if (of_property_read_bool(np, "mmc-hs200-1_8v") ||
> > + of_property_read_bool(np, "sd-uhs-sdr50") ||
>
> Minor formatting issue, but can you make sure all the conditions are aligned
> vertically from the left?
>
It will also be updated in the next patch version.
> > of_property_read_bool(np, "sd-uhs-sdr104")) {
> > aspeed_sdc_set_slot_capability(host, dev->parent,
> ASPEED_SDC_CAP1_1_8V,
> > true, slot);
> > }
> >
> > + if (of_property_read_bool(np, "sd-uhs-sdr50")) {
> > + aspeed_sdc_set_slot_capability(host, dev->parent,
> ASPEED_SDC_CAP2_SDR50,
> > + true, slot);
> > + }
> > +
> > if (of_property_read_bool(np, "sd-uhs-sdr104")) {
> > aspeed_sdc_set_slot_capability(host, dev->parent,
> ASPEED_SDC_CAP2_SDR104,
> > true, slot);
> > --
> > 2.17.1
Chin-Ting