The freed IRQ is not necessary the one requested in probe.
Even if it was, with two or more i2c-controllers it will fails anyway.
Signed-off-by: Marcus Folkesson <[email protected]>
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-davinci.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-davinci.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-davinci.c
index a76d85f..79b4bcb 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-davinci.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-davinci.c
@@ -755,7 +755,7 @@ static int davinci_i2c_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
dev->clk = NULL;
davinci_i2c_write_reg(dev, DAVINCI_I2C_MDR_REG, 0);
- free_irq(IRQ_I2C, dev);
+ free_irq(dev->irq, dev);
iounmap(dev->base);
kfree(dev);
--
1.7.5.4
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 03:56:36PM +0200, Marcus Folkesson wrote:
> The freed IRQ is not necessary the one requested in probe.
> Even if it was, with two or more i2c-controllers it will fails anyway.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcus Folkesson <[email protected]>
Applied to current, thanks!
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |