On 10.11.2017 17:28, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 14:29:14 +0200
> "Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>> +void trace_graph_register_gui_handler(struct graph_info *info,
>> + struct gui_event_handler *handler) {
>> + handler->next = info->event_handlers;
>> + info->event_handlers = handler;
>> +}
>> +
>
>>
>> +void trace_view_store_register_gui_handler(TraceViewStore *store, struct gui_event_handler *handler)
>> +{
>> + handler->next = store->event_handlers;
>> + store->event_handlers = handler;
>> +}
>> +
>
> Hmm, and in the last patch we have:
>
> + trace_view_store_register_gui_handler(ks_store, switch_handler);
> + trace_view_store_register_gui_handler(ks_store, wakeup_handler);
> +
> + trace_graph_register_gui_handler(ks_info->ginfo, switch_handler);
> + trace_graph_register_gui_handler(ks_info->ginfo, wakeup_handler);
>
> I think I see an issue here. ;-)
>
> (Hint, what's the state of switch_handler->next and
> wakeup_handler->next, when this is done?)
I see the issue now.
Thank you very much!
Yordan
> -- Steve
From 1583693544323161719@xxx Fri Nov 10 15:30:58 +0000 2017
X-GM-THRID: 1583682358674608028
X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread