2015-07-21 12:06:58

by Sudip Mukherjee

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/2] drm/i915: remove unnecessary null test

While creating the debugfs file we are setting the inode->i_private to
dev. That same dev is passed to these functions as private of struct
seq_file via single_open(). Moreover single_open is setting
file->private_data->private to dev.
So at this point it can never be NULL.
This check was added by commit eb3394faeb97 ("drm/i915: Add debugfs test
control files for Displayport compliance testing")

Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <[email protected]>
---

v3: removed the check in i915_displayport_test_active_write also
v2: removed null check
v1 was drm/i915: fix possible null pointer dereference

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 21 +--------------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
index bc817da..ffce62e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
@@ -4028,24 +4028,14 @@ static ssize_t i915_displayport_test_active_write(struct file *file,
{
char *input_buffer;
int status = 0;
- struct seq_file *m;
struct drm_device *dev;
struct drm_connector *connector;
struct list_head *connector_list;
struct intel_dp *intel_dp;
int val = 0;

- m = file->private_data;
- if (!m) {
- status = -ENODEV;
- return status;
- }
- dev = m->private;
+ dev = ((struct seq_file *)file->private_data)->private;

- if (!dev) {
- status = -ENODEV;
- return status;
- }
connector_list = &dev->mode_config.connector_list;

if (len == 0)
@@ -4103,9 +4093,6 @@ static int i915_displayport_test_active_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
struct list_head *connector_list = &dev->mode_config.connector_list;
struct intel_dp *intel_dp;

- if (!dev)
- return -ENODEV;
-
list_for_each_entry(connector, connector_list, head) {

if (connector->connector_type !=
@@ -4150,9 +4137,6 @@ static int i915_displayport_test_data_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
struct list_head *connector_list = &dev->mode_config.connector_list;
struct intel_dp *intel_dp;

- if (!dev)
- return -ENODEV;
-
list_for_each_entry(connector, connector_list, head) {

if (connector->connector_type !=
@@ -4192,9 +4176,6 @@ static int i915_displayport_test_type_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
struct list_head *connector_list = &dev->mode_config.connector_list;
struct intel_dp *intel_dp;

- if (!dev)
- return -ENODEV;
-
list_for_each_entry(connector, connector_list, head) {

if (connector->connector_type !=
--
1.8.1.2


2015-07-21 12:07:30

by Sudip Mukherjee

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/i915: remove redundant if check

The extra check for connector_type is not required as we are already
checking for connector_type != DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_DisplayPort.
The check was added by commit eb3394faeb97 ("drm/i915: Add debugfs test
control files for Displayport compliance testing")

Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <[email protected]>
---
v3: It is new. Submitting together in a series as the changes are in the
same part of the code.

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
index ffce62e..caf1382 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
@@ -4059,9 +4059,7 @@ static ssize_t i915_displayport_test_active_write(struct file *file,
DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_DisplayPort)
continue;

- if (connector->connector_type ==
- DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_DisplayPort &&
- connector->status == connector_status_connected &&
+ if (connector->status == connector_status_connected &&
connector->encoder != NULL) {
intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(connector->encoder);
status = kstrtoint(input_buffer, 10, &val);
--
1.8.1.2

2015-07-21 13:49:04

by Daniel Vetter

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] drm/i915: remove unnecessary null test

On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 05:36:45PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> While creating the debugfs file we are setting the inode->i_private to
> dev. That same dev is passed to these functions as private of struct
> seq_file via single_open(). Moreover single_open is setting
> file->private_data->private to dev.
> So at this point it can never be NULL.
> This check was added by commit eb3394faeb97 ("drm/i915: Add debugfs test
> control files for Displayport compliance testing")
>

Still missing

Cc: Chris Wilson ...
Cc: Todd Previte ...

here to make sure reviewers/original authors are in the loop. Anyway this
is a simple enough patch, so I just pulled them both in.

Thanks, Daniel

> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> v3: removed the check in i915_displayport_test_active_write also
> v2: removed null check
> v1 was drm/i915: fix possible null pointer dereference
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 21 +--------------------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index bc817da..ffce62e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -4028,24 +4028,14 @@ static ssize_t i915_displayport_test_active_write(struct file *file,
> {
> char *input_buffer;
> int status = 0;
> - struct seq_file *m;
> struct drm_device *dev;
> struct drm_connector *connector;
> struct list_head *connector_list;
> struct intel_dp *intel_dp;
> int val = 0;
>
> - m = file->private_data;
> - if (!m) {
> - status = -ENODEV;
> - return status;
> - }
> - dev = m->private;
> + dev = ((struct seq_file *)file->private_data)->private;
>
> - if (!dev) {
> - status = -ENODEV;
> - return status;
> - }
> connector_list = &dev->mode_config.connector_list;
>
> if (len == 0)
> @@ -4103,9 +4093,6 @@ static int i915_displayport_test_active_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
> struct list_head *connector_list = &dev->mode_config.connector_list;
> struct intel_dp *intel_dp;
>
> - if (!dev)
> - return -ENODEV;
> -
> list_for_each_entry(connector, connector_list, head) {
>
> if (connector->connector_type !=
> @@ -4150,9 +4137,6 @@ static int i915_displayport_test_data_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
> struct list_head *connector_list = &dev->mode_config.connector_list;
> struct intel_dp *intel_dp;
>
> - if (!dev)
> - return -ENODEV;
> -
> list_for_each_entry(connector, connector_list, head) {
>
> if (connector->connector_type !=
> @@ -4192,9 +4176,6 @@ static int i915_displayport_test_type_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
> struct list_head *connector_list = &dev->mode_config.connector_list;
> struct intel_dp *intel_dp;
>
> - if (!dev)
> - return -ENODEV;
> -
> list_for_each_entry(connector, connector_list, head) {
>
> if (connector->connector_type !=
> --
> 1.8.1.2
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch

2015-07-21 13:56:43

by Sudip Mukherjee

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] drm/i915: remove unnecessary null test

On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 03:51:40PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 05:36:45PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > While creating the debugfs file we are setting the inode->i_private to
> > dev. That same dev is passed to these functions as private of struct
> > seq_file via single_open(). Moreover single_open is setting
> > file->private_data->private to dev.
> > So at this point it can never be NULL.
> > This check was added by commit eb3394faeb97 ("drm/i915: Add debugfs test
> > control files for Displayport compliance testing")
> >
>
> Still missing
>
> Cc: Chris Wilson ...
> Cc: Todd Previte ...
>
> here to make sure reviewers/original authors are in the loop. Anyway this
> is a simple enough patch, so I just pulled them both in.
Sorry. did you mean to put Cc: here before the Signed-off-by: ?
I have put them in Cc list of the patches.
For my next patch you will not get these issues.

regards
sudip