2016-03-17 14:05:39

by Maarten ter Huurne

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/4] regulator: act8865: Remove redundant dev lookups

The local variable "dev" already contains a pointer to the device,
so there is no need to take the address of "client->dev" again.

Signed-off-by: Maarten ter Huurne <[email protected]>
---
drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c
index 000d566..89f856f 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c
@@ -498,8 +498,7 @@ static int act8865_pmic_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
act8865->regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &act8865_regmap_config);
if (IS_ERR(act8865->regmap)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(act8865->regmap);
- dev_err(&client->dev, "Failed to allocate register map: %d\n",
- ret);
+ dev_err(dev, "Failed to allocate register map: %d\n", ret);
return ret;
}

@@ -526,7 +525,7 @@ static int act8865_pmic_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
config.driver_data = act8865;
config.regmap = act8865->regmap;

- rdev = devm_regulator_register(&client->dev, desc, &config);
+ rdev = devm_regulator_register(dev, desc, &config);
if (IS_ERR(rdev)) {
dev_err(dev, "failed to register %s\n", desc->name);
return PTR_ERR(rdev);
--
2.6.2


2016-03-17 14:05:34

by Maarten ter Huurne

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/4] regulator: act8865: Remove "too many regulators" error handler

The check would dereference pdata, which can be NULL in the non-DT
use case.

Nothing will break if pdata->num_regulators is larger than the number
of regulators that the driver defines: pdata->num_regulators is only
read in act8865_get_init_data() to iterate through pdata->regulators.

The error handler might have some value as a sanity check on the
platform data, but the platform data could be broken in many other
ways that are not checked for (unknown IDs, duplicate IDs), so I see
no reason to perform only this specific check.

Signed-off-by: Maarten ter Huurne <[email protected]>
---
drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c
index 89f856f..69cdad0 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c
@@ -485,12 +485,6 @@ static int act8865_pmic_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
pdata = &pdata_of;
}

- if (pdata->num_regulators > num_regulators) {
- dev_err(dev, "too many regulators: %d\n",
- pdata->num_regulators);
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
act8865 = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct act8865), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!act8865)
return -ENOMEM;
--
2.6.2

2016-03-17 14:05:41

by Maarten ter Huurne

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/4] regulator: act8865: Configure register access for act8600

This can be used to expose the act8600 registers via debugfs.

Signed-off-by: Maarten ter Huurne <[email protected]>
---
drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c
index 527926b..a1cd0d4 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c
@@ -139,6 +139,74 @@ struct act8865 {
int off_mask;
};

+static const struct regmap_range act8600_reg_ranges[] = {
+ regmap_reg_range(0x00, 0x01),
+ regmap_reg_range(0x10, 0x10),
+ regmap_reg_range(0x12, 0x12),
+ regmap_reg_range(0x20, 0x20),
+ regmap_reg_range(0x22, 0x22),
+ regmap_reg_range(0x30, 0x30),
+ regmap_reg_range(0x32, 0x32),
+ regmap_reg_range(0x40, 0x41),
+ regmap_reg_range(0x50, 0x51),
+ regmap_reg_range(0x60, 0x61),
+ regmap_reg_range(0x70, 0x71),
+ regmap_reg_range(0x80, 0x81),
+ regmap_reg_range(0x91, 0x91),
+ regmap_reg_range(0xA1, 0xA1),
+ regmap_reg_range(0xA8, 0xAA),
+ regmap_reg_range(0xB0, 0xB0),
+ regmap_reg_range(0xB2, 0xB2),
+ regmap_reg_range(0xC1, 0xC1),
+};
+
+static const struct regmap_range act8600_reg_ro_ranges[] = {
+ regmap_reg_range(0xAA, 0xAA),
+ regmap_reg_range(0xC1, 0xC1),
+};
+
+static const struct regmap_range act8600_reg_volatile_ranges[] = {
+ regmap_reg_range(0x00, 0x01),
+ regmap_reg_range(0x12, 0x12),
+ regmap_reg_range(0x22, 0x22),
+ regmap_reg_range(0x32, 0x32),
+ regmap_reg_range(0x41, 0x41),
+ regmap_reg_range(0x51, 0x51),
+ regmap_reg_range(0x61, 0x61),
+ regmap_reg_range(0x71, 0x71),
+ regmap_reg_range(0x81, 0x81),
+ regmap_reg_range(0xA8, 0xA8),
+ regmap_reg_range(0xAA, 0xAA),
+ regmap_reg_range(0xB0, 0xB0),
+ regmap_reg_range(0xC1, 0xC1),
+};
+
+static const struct regmap_access_table act8600_write_ranges_table = {
+ .yes_ranges = act8600_reg_ranges,
+ .n_yes_ranges = ARRAY_SIZE(act8600_reg_ranges),
+ .no_ranges = act8600_reg_ro_ranges,
+ .n_no_ranges = ARRAY_SIZE(act8600_reg_ro_ranges),
+};
+
+static const struct regmap_access_table act8600_read_ranges_table = {
+ .yes_ranges = act8600_reg_ranges,
+ .n_yes_ranges = ARRAY_SIZE(act8600_reg_ranges),
+};
+
+static const struct regmap_access_table act8600_volatile_ranges_table = {
+ .yes_ranges = act8600_reg_volatile_ranges,
+ .n_yes_ranges = ARRAY_SIZE(act8600_reg_volatile_ranges),
+};
+
+static const struct regmap_config act8600_regmap_config = {
+ .reg_bits = 8,
+ .val_bits = 8,
+ .max_register = 0xFF,
+ .wr_table = &act8600_write_ranges_table,
+ .rd_table = &act8600_read_ranges_table,
+ .volatile_table = &act8600_volatile_ranges_table,
+};
+
static const struct regmap_config act8865_regmap_config = {
.reg_bits = 8,
.val_bits = 8,
@@ -418,6 +486,7 @@ static int act8865_pmic_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
struct device *dev = &client->dev;
int i, ret, num_regulators;
struct act8865 *act8865;
+ const struct regmap_config *regmap_config;
unsigned long type;
int off_reg, off_mask;
int voltage_select = 0;
@@ -444,12 +513,14 @@ static int act8865_pmic_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
case ACT8600:
regulators = act8600_regulators;
num_regulators = ARRAY_SIZE(act8600_regulators);
+ regmap_config = &act8600_regmap_config;
off_reg = -1;
off_mask = -1;
break;
case ACT8846:
regulators = act8846_regulators;
num_regulators = ARRAY_SIZE(act8846_regulators);
+ regmap_config = &act8865_regmap_config;
off_reg = ACT8846_GLB_OFF_CTRL;
off_mask = ACT8846_OFF_SYSMASK;
break;
@@ -461,6 +532,7 @@ static int act8865_pmic_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
regulators = act8865_regulators;
num_regulators = ARRAY_SIZE(act8865_regulators);
}
+ regmap_config = &act8865_regmap_config;
off_reg = ACT8865_SYS_CTRL;
off_mask = ACT8865_MSTROFF;
break;
@@ -481,7 +553,7 @@ static int act8865_pmic_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
if (!act8865)
return -ENOMEM;

- act8865->regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &act8865_regmap_config);
+ act8865->regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, regmap_config);
if (IS_ERR(act8865->regmap)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(act8865->regmap);
dev_err(dev, "Failed to allocate register map: %d\n", ret);
--
2.6.2

2016-03-17 14:06:03

by Maarten ter Huurne

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] regulator: act8865: Pass of_node via act8865_regulator_data

This makes the code easier to read and it avoids a dynamic memory
allocation.

Signed-off-by: Maarten ter Huurne <[email protected]>
---
drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c | 28 ++++++++++++----------------
include/linux/regulator/act8865.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c
index 69cdad0..527926b 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c
@@ -319,7 +319,6 @@ static struct of_regulator_match act8600_matches[] = {
};

static int act8865_pdata_from_dt(struct device *dev,
- struct device_node **of_node,
struct act8865_platform_data *pdata,
unsigned long type)
{
@@ -370,7 +369,7 @@ static int act8865_pdata_from_dt(struct device *dev,
regulator->id = i;
regulator->name = matches[i].name;
regulator->init_data = matches[i].init_data;
- of_node[i] = matches[i].of_node;
+ regulator->of_node = matches[i].of_node;
regulator++;
}

@@ -378,7 +377,6 @@ static int act8865_pdata_from_dt(struct device *dev,
}
#else
static inline int act8865_pdata_from_dt(struct device *dev,
- struct device_node **of_node,
struct act8865_platform_data *pdata,
unsigned long type)
{
@@ -386,8 +384,8 @@ static inline int act8865_pdata_from_dt(struct device *dev,
}
#endif

-static struct regulator_init_data
-*act8865_get_init_data(int id, struct act8865_platform_data *pdata)
+static struct act8865_regulator_data *act8865_get_regulator_data(
+ int id, struct act8865_platform_data *pdata)
{
int i;

@@ -396,7 +394,7 @@ static struct regulator_init_data

for (i = 0; i < pdata->num_regulators; i++) {
if (pdata->regulators[i].id == id)
- return pdata->regulators[i].init_data;
+ return &pdata->regulators[i];
}

return NULL;
@@ -418,7 +416,6 @@ static int act8865_pmic_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
const struct regulator_desc *regulators;
struct act8865_platform_data pdata_of, *pdata;
struct device *dev = &client->dev;
- struct device_node **of_node;
int i, ret, num_regulators;
struct act8865 *act8865;
unsigned long type;
@@ -472,13 +469,8 @@ static int act8865_pmic_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
return -EINVAL;
}

- of_node = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct device_node *) *
- num_regulators, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!of_node)
- return -ENOMEM;
-
if (dev->of_node && !pdata) {
- ret = act8865_pdata_from_dt(dev, of_node, &pdata_of, type);
+ ret = act8865_pdata_from_dt(dev, &pdata_of, type);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;

@@ -511,14 +503,19 @@ static int act8865_pmic_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
for (i = 0; i < num_regulators; i++) {
const struct regulator_desc *desc = &regulators[i];
struct regulator_config config = { };
+ struct act8865_regulator_data *rdata;
struct regulator_dev *rdev;

config.dev = dev;
- config.init_data = act8865_get_init_data(desc->id, pdata);
- config.of_node = of_node[i];
config.driver_data = act8865;
config.regmap = act8865->regmap;

+ rdata = act8865_get_regulator_data(desc->id, pdata);
+ if (rdata) {
+ config.init_data = rdata->init_data;
+ config.of_node = rdata->of_node;
+ }
+
rdev = devm_regulator_register(dev, desc, &config);
if (IS_ERR(rdev)) {
dev_err(dev, "failed to register %s\n", desc->name);
@@ -527,7 +524,6 @@ static int act8865_pmic_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
}

i2c_set_clientdata(client, act8865);
- devm_kfree(dev, of_node);

return 0;
}
diff --git a/include/linux/regulator/act8865.h b/include/linux/regulator/act8865.h
index 2eb3860..113d861 100644
--- a/include/linux/regulator/act8865.h
+++ b/include/linux/regulator/act8865.h
@@ -69,11 +69,13 @@ enum {
* @id: regulator id
* @name: regulator name
* @init_data: regulator init data
+ * @of_node: device tree node (optional)
*/
struct act8865_regulator_data {
int id;
const char *name;
struct regulator_init_data *init_data;
+ struct device_node *of_node;
};

/**
--
2.6.2

2016-03-23 13:43:16

by Mark Brown

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Applied "regulator: act8865: Remove redundant dev lookups" to the regulator tree

The patch

regulator: act8865: Remove redundant dev lookups

has been applied to the regulator tree at

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

>From de14ba67378df74c6328f75fd6972ef83ed4639b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Maarten ter Huurne <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 15:05:05 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: act8865: Remove redundant dev lookups

The local variable "dev" already contains a pointer to the device,
so there is no need to take the address of "client->dev" again.

Signed-off-by: Maarten ter Huurne <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
---
drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c
index 000d566e32a4..89f856f257f7 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c
@@ -498,8 +498,7 @@ static int act8865_pmic_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
act8865->regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &act8865_regmap_config);
if (IS_ERR(act8865->regmap)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(act8865->regmap);
- dev_err(&client->dev, "Failed to allocate register map: %d\n",
- ret);
+ dev_err(dev, "Failed to allocate register map: %d\n", ret);
return ret;
}

@@ -526,7 +525,7 @@ static int act8865_pmic_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
config.driver_data = act8865;
config.regmap = act8865->regmap;

- rdev = devm_regulator_register(&client->dev, desc, &config);
+ rdev = devm_regulator_register(dev, desc, &config);
if (IS_ERR(rdev)) {
dev_err(dev, "failed to register %s\n", desc->name);
return PTR_ERR(rdev);
--
2.7.0

2016-03-23 13:44:20

by Mark Brown

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Applied "regulator: act8865: Remove "too many regulators" error handler" to the regulator tree

The patch

regulator: act8865: Remove "too many regulators" error handler

has been applied to the regulator tree at

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

>From e6e79fd9cee682b137779d2da3b379251927d99f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Maarten ter Huurne <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 15:05:06 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: act8865: Remove "too many regulators" error
handler

The check would dereference pdata, which can be NULL in the non-DT
use case.

Nothing will break if pdata->num_regulators is larger than the number
of regulators that the driver defines: pdata->num_regulators is only
read in act8865_get_init_data() to iterate through pdata->regulators.

The error handler might have some value as a sanity check on the
platform data, but the platform data could be broken in many other
ways that are not checked for (unknown IDs, duplicate IDs), so I see
no reason to perform only this specific check.

Signed-off-by: Maarten ter Huurne <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
---
drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c
index 89f856f257f7..69cdad0f71ba 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/act8865-regulator.c
@@ -485,12 +485,6 @@ static int act8865_pmic_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
pdata = &pdata_of;
}

- if (pdata->num_regulators > num_regulators) {
- dev_err(dev, "too many regulators: %d\n",
- pdata->num_regulators);
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
act8865 = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct act8865), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!act8865)
return -ENOMEM;
--
2.7.0

2016-03-29 07:46:10

by Mark Brown

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] regulator: act8865: Pass of_node via act8865_regulator_data

On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 03:05:07PM +0100, Maarten ter Huurne wrote:
> This makes the code easier to read and it avoids a dynamic memory
> allocation.

Please write better changelogs. This is a very fiddly and non obvious
set of transformations and it takes far too much effort to work out what
this change does and why it's safe.


Attachments:
(No filename) (331.00 B)
signature.asc (473.00 B)
Download all attachments