Removed checkpatch warning caused by FSF address block
Signed-off-by: Parth Sane <[email protected]>
---
drivers/staging/rtl8712/hal_init.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/hal_init.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8712/hal_init.c
index 8008efe..225ef37 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/hal_init.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8712/hal_init.c
@@ -13,10 +13,6 @@
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for
* more details.
*
- * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with
- * this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc.,
- * 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110, USA
- *
* Modifications for inclusion into the Linux staging tree are
* Copyright(c) 2010 Larry Finger. All rights reserved.
*
--
1.9.1
On 03/20/2016 08:59 AM, Parth Sane wrote:
> Removed checkpatch warning caused by FSF address block
> Signed-off-by: Parth Sane <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8712/hal_init.c | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
Now you have at least 3 different patches all with the same subject! How is the
maintainer supposed to keep them separate? Patchworks will replace each of them
with the next one having the same title.
A better way would be to create a multiple-part set of patches with the subject
containing the name of the file being "fixed".
Note that this warning was added to checkpatch.pl well after the driver was
added to the staging tree. In fact, if this warning had been present then, the
FSF address would have been removed.
I consider this type of patch to be of minimal value; however, if you do not
remove this warning, then someone else will. Thus, you should repackage these
changes. By my count, there are 94 files containing this information. Dropping
them as one set of patches might be too many at once. I would split them into
groups of 13 files in one batch, 14 in the next, then 15, 16, 17, and finally
19, then each group will also be distinguishable.
If GregKH wants it done differently, he will let us know.
Larry
> On 20-Mar-2016, at 7:56 PM, Larry Finger <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 03/20/2016 08:59 AM, Parth Sane wrote:
>> Removed checkpatch warning caused by FSF address block
>> Signed-off-by: Parth Sane <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> drivers/staging/rtl8712/hal_init.c | 4 ----
>> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> Now you have at least 3 different patches all with the same subject! How is the maintainer supposed to keep them separate? Patchworks will replace each of them with the next one having the same title.
>
> A better way would be to create a multiple-part set of patches with the subject containing the name of the file being "fixed".
>
> Note that this warning was added to checkpatch.pl well after the driver was added to the staging tree. In fact, if this warning had been present then, the FSF address would have been removed.
>
> I consider this type of patch to be of minimal value; however, if you do not remove this warning, then someone else will. Thus, you should repackage these changes. By my count, there are 94 files containing this information. Dropping them as one set of patches might be too many at once. I would split them into groups of 13 files in one batch, 14 in the next, then 15, 16, 17, and finally 19, then each group will also be distinguishable.
>
> If GregKH wants it done differently, he will let us know.
>
> Larry
>
Hi,
It has been pointed out to me that I should send patch sets. I will be doing so. So please ignore the earlier sent patches except the parenthesis patch.
Its been a pleasure to work with such a helpful community and hope to do do more in the future.
Regards,
Parth Sane