In function btrfs_uuid_tree_iterate(), errno is assigned to variable ret
on errors. However, it directly returns 0. It may be better to return
ret. This patch also removes the warning, because the caller already
prints a warning.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=188731
Signed-off-by: Pan Bian <[email protected]>
---
fs/btrfs/uuid-tree.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/uuid-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/uuid-tree.c
index 7fc89e4..83bb2f2 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/uuid-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/uuid-tree.c
@@ -351,7 +351,5 @@ int btrfs_uuid_tree_iterate(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
out:
btrfs_free_path(path);
- if (ret)
- btrfs_warn(fs_info, "btrfs_uuid_tree_iterate failed %d", ret);
- return 0;
+ return ret;
}
--
1.9.1
On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 12:51:53PM +0800, Pan Bian wrote:
> In function btrfs_uuid_tree_iterate(), errno is assigned to variable ret
> on errors. However, it directly returns 0. It may be better to return
> ret. This patch also removes the warning, because the caller already
> prints a warning.
>
> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=188731
Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Pan Bian <[email protected]>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/uuid-tree.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/uuid-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/uuid-tree.c
> index 7fc89e4..83bb2f2 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/uuid-tree.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/uuid-tree.c
> @@ -351,7 +351,5 @@ int btrfs_uuid_tree_iterate(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>
> out:
> btrfs_free_path(path);
> - if (ret)
> - btrfs_warn(fs_info, "btrfs_uuid_tree_iterate failed %d", ret);
> - return 0;
> + return ret;
> }
> --
> 1.9.1
>
>
On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 11:57:07AM -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 12:51:53PM +0800, Pan Bian wrote:
> > In function btrfs_uuid_tree_iterate(), errno is assigned to variable ret
> > on errors. However, it directly returns 0. It may be better to return
> > ret. This patch also removes the warning, because the caller already
> > prints a warning.
> >
> > Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=188731
>
> Looks good.
>
> Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <[email protected]>
Added to 4.10 queue.