2017-09-18 14:13:04

by Bhumika Goyal

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] powerpc: make irq_chip const, __initdata and __initconst

Make ehv_pic_irq_chip, mpic_ipi_chip and mpic_tm_chip const as they are
used only as a copy operation. This usage is during init, so make them
__initconst too.
Make mpic_ipi_chip __initdata as it is only modified during the init
phase and there is no reference of it anywhere after init.

Signed-off-by: Bhumika Goyal <[email protected]>
---
arch/powerpc/sysdev/ehv_pic.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c | 6 +++---
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ehv_pic.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ehv_pic.c
index 48866e6..12a54f3 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ehv_pic.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ehv_pic.c
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ int ehv_pic_set_irq_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int flow_type)
return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_NOCOPY;
}

-static struct irq_chip ehv_pic_irq_chip = {
+static const struct irq_chip ehv_pic_irq_chip __initconst = {
.irq_mask = ehv_pic_mask_irq,
.irq_unmask = ehv_pic_unmask_irq,
.irq_eoi = ehv_pic_end_irq,
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c
index ead3e25..6a435c0 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c
@@ -964,21 +964,21 @@ static void mpic_set_destination(unsigned int virq, unsigned int cpuid)
};

#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
-static struct irq_chip mpic_ipi_chip = {
+static const struct irq_chip mpic_ipi_chip __initconst = {
.irq_mask = mpic_mask_ipi,
.irq_unmask = mpic_unmask_ipi,
.irq_eoi = mpic_end_ipi,
};
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */

-static struct irq_chip mpic_tm_chip = {
+static struct irq_chip mpic_tm_chip __initdata = {
.irq_mask = mpic_mask_tm,
.irq_unmask = mpic_unmask_tm,
.irq_eoi = mpic_end_irq,
};

#ifdef CONFIG_MPIC_U3_HT_IRQS
-static struct irq_chip mpic_irq_ht_chip = {
+static const struct irq_chip mpic_irq_ht_chip __initconst = {
.irq_startup = mpic_startup_ht_irq,
.irq_shutdown = mpic_shutdown_ht_irq,
.irq_mask = mpic_mask_irq,
--
1.9.1


2017-09-20 06:23:38

by Michael Ellerman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: make irq_chip const, __initdata and __initconst

Bhumika Goyal <[email protected]> writes:

> Make ehv_pic_irq_chip, mpic_ipi_chip and mpic_tm_chip const as they are
> used only as a copy operation. This usage is during init, so make them
> __initconst too.
> Make mpic_ipi_chip __initdata as it is only modified during the init
> phase and there is no reference of it anywhere after init.

The change log doesn't seem to match the code.

It's mpic_tm_chip which you marked __initdata, and that looks wrong, as
we keep a pointer to it here:

mpic->hc_tm = mpic_tm_chip;

cheers

2017-09-20 06:34:03

by Julia Lawall

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: make irq_chip const, __initdata and __initconst



On Wed, 20 Sep 2017, Michael Ellerman wrote:

> Bhumika Goyal <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > Make ehv_pic_irq_chip, mpic_ipi_chip and mpic_tm_chip const as they are
> > used only as a copy operation. This usage is during init, so make them
> > __initconst too.
> > Make mpic_ipi_chip __initdata as it is only modified during the init
> > phase and there is no reference of it anywhere after init.
>
> The change log doesn't seem to match the code.
>
> It's mpic_tm_chip which you marked __initdata, and that looks wrong, as
> we keep a pointer to it here:
>
> mpic->hc_tm = mpic_tm_chip;

This looks like a memory copy.

julia

2017-09-20 11:11:35

by Michael Ellerman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: make irq_chip const, __initdata and __initconst

Julia Lawall <[email protected]> writes:

> On Wed, 20 Sep 2017, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
>> Bhumika Goyal <[email protected]> writes:
>>
>> > Make ehv_pic_irq_chip, mpic_ipi_chip and mpic_tm_chip const as they are
>> > used only as a copy operation. This usage is during init, so make them
>> > __initconst too.
>> > Make mpic_ipi_chip __initdata as it is only modified during the init
>> > phase and there is no reference of it anywhere after init.
>>
>> The change log doesn't seem to match the code.
>>
>> It's mpic_tm_chip which you marked __initdata, and that looks wrong, as
>> we keep a pointer to it here:
>>
>> mpic->hc_tm = mpic_tm_chip;
>
> This looks like a memory copy.

Yes you're right.

That's pretty horrible given the size of struct irq_chip, but it's not a
bug in this patch.

There are 5 struct irq_chip's embedded in struct mpic, it must be
enormous!

cheers