2019-06-27 06:22:53

by Harini Katakam

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] Sub ns increment fixes in Macb PTP

The subns increment register fields are not captured correctly in the
driver. Fix the same and also increase the subns incr resolution.

Sub ns resolution was increased to 24 bits in r1p06f2 version. To my
knowledge, this PTP driver, with its current BD time stamp
implementation, is only useful to that version or above. So, I have
increased the resolution unconditionally. Please let me know if there
is any IP versions incompatible with this - there is no register to
obtain this information from.

Changes from RFC:
None

Harini Katakam (2):
net: macb: Add separate definition for PPM fraction
net: macb: Fix SUBNS increment and increase resolution

drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.h | 9 ++++++++-
drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_ptp.c | 7 +++++--
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--
2.7.4


2019-06-27 06:23:39

by Harini Katakam

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] net: macb: Fix SUBNS increment and increase resolution

The subns increment register has 24 bits as follows:
RegBit[15:0] = Subns[23:8]; RegBit[31:24] = Subns[7:0]

Fix the same in the driver and increase sub ns resolution to the
best capable, 24 bits. This should be the case on all GEM versions
that this PTP driver supports.

Signed-off-by: Harini Katakam <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.h | 6 +++++-
drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_ptp.c | 5 ++++-
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.h
index 90bc70b..03983bd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.h
@@ -496,7 +496,11 @@

/* Bitfields in TISUBN */
#define GEM_SUBNSINCR_OFFSET 0
-#define GEM_SUBNSINCR_SIZE 16
+#define GEM_SUBNSINCRL_OFFSET 24
+#define GEM_SUBNSINCRL_SIZE 8
+#define GEM_SUBNSINCRH_OFFSET 0
+#define GEM_SUBNSINCRH_SIZE 16
+#define GEM_SUBNSINCR_SIZE 24

/* Bitfields in TI */
#define GEM_NSINCR_OFFSET 0
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_ptp.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_ptp.c
index 6276eac..43a3f0d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_ptp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_ptp.c
@@ -104,7 +104,10 @@ static int gem_tsu_incr_set(struct macb *bp, struct tsu_incr *incr_spec)
* to take effect.
*/
spin_lock_irqsave(&bp->tsu_clk_lock, flags);
- gem_writel(bp, TISUBN, GEM_BF(SUBNSINCR, incr_spec->sub_ns));
+ /* RegBit[15:0] = Subns[23:8]; RegBit[31:24] = Subns[7:0] */
+ gem_writel(bp, TISUBN, GEM_BF(SUBNSINCRL, incr_spec->sub_ns) |
+ GEM_BF(SUBNSINCRH, (incr_spec->sub_ns >>
+ GEM_SUBNSINCRL_SIZE)));
gem_writel(bp, TI, GEM_BF(NSINCR, incr_spec->ns));
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bp->tsu_clk_lock, flags);

--
2.7.4

2019-06-29 18:10:20

by David Miller

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Sub ns increment fixes in Macb PTP

From: Harini Katakam <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 11:50:58 +0530

> The subns increment register fields are not captured correctly in the
> driver. Fix the same and also increase the subns incr resolution.
>
> Sub ns resolution was increased to 24 bits in r1p06f2 version. To my
> knowledge, this PTP driver, with its current BD time stamp
> implementation, is only useful to that version or above. So, I have
> increased the resolution unconditionally. Please let me know if there
> is any IP versions incompatible with this - there is no register to
> obtain this information from.
>
> Changes from RFC:
> None

Series applied, thanks.