Kernel test robot throws below warning ->
smatch warnings:
sound/isa/opti9xx/opti92x-ad1848.c:191 snd_opti9xx_init() warn:
inconsistent indenting
sound/isa/opti9xx/opti92x-ad1848.c:488 snd_opti9xx_init() warn:
inconsistent indenting
Reported-by: Abaci Robot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Yang Li <[email protected]>
---
sound/isa/opti9xx/opti92x-ad1848.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/isa/opti9xx/opti92x-ad1848.c b/sound/isa/opti9xx/opti92x-ad1848.c
index 08e61d9..234f023 100644
--- a/sound/isa/opti9xx/opti92x-ad1848.c
+++ b/sound/isa/opti9xx/opti92x-ad1848.c
@@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ static int snd_opti9xx_init(struct snd_opti9xx *chip,
chip->mc_base_size = opti9xx_mc_size[hardware];
}
#else
- chip->mc_base_size = opti9xx_mc_size[hardware];
+ chip->mc_base_size = opti9xx_mc_size[hardware];
#endif
switch (hardware) {
@@ -485,7 +485,7 @@ static int snd_opti9xx_configure(struct snd_opti9xx *chip,
#endif /* CS4231 || OPTi93X */
#ifndef OPTi93X
- outb(irq_bits << 3 | dma_bits, chip->wss_base);
+ outb(irq_bits << 3 | dma_bits, chip->wss_base);
#else /* OPTi93X */
snd_opti9xx_write(chip, OPTi9XX_MC_REG(3), (irq_bits << 3 | dma_bits));
#endif /* OPTi93X */
--
1.8.3.1
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 11:59:58 +0200,
Yang Li wrote:
>
> Kernel test robot throws below warning ->
>
> smatch warnings:
> sound/isa/opti9xx/opti92x-ad1848.c:191 snd_opti9xx_init() warn:
> inconsistent indenting
> sound/isa/opti9xx/opti92x-ad1848.c:488 snd_opti9xx_init() warn:
> inconsistent indenting
>
> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Li <[email protected]>
> ---
> sound/isa/opti9xx/opti92x-ad1848.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/isa/opti9xx/opti92x-ad1848.c b/sound/isa/opti9xx/opti92x-ad1848.c
> index 08e61d9..234f023 100644
> --- a/sound/isa/opti9xx/opti92x-ad1848.c
> +++ b/sound/isa/opti9xx/opti92x-ad1848.c
> @@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ static int snd_opti9xx_init(struct snd_opti9xx *chip,
> chip->mc_base_size = opti9xx_mc_size[hardware];
> }
> #else
> - chip->mc_base_size = opti9xx_mc_size[hardware];
> + chip->mc_base_size = opti9xx_mc_size[hardware];
> #endif
No, it's not correct.
The ifdef is a bit tricky here but the line you changed belongs
to the else section.
thanks,
Takashi