2021-06-15 02:27:41

by Siddharth Gupta

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/4] remoteproc: core: Move validate before device add

We can validate whether the remoteproc is correctly setup before
making the cdev_add and device_add calls. This saves us the
trouble of cleaning up later on.

Signed-off-by: Siddharth Gupta <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]>
---
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index 9ad8c5f..b65fce3 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -2333,16 +2333,16 @@ int rproc_add(struct rproc *rproc)
struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
int ret;

- /* add char device for this remoteproc */
- ret = rproc_char_device_add(rproc);
+ ret = rproc_validate(rproc);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;

- ret = device_add(dev);
+ /* add char device for this remoteproc */
+ ret = rproc_char_device_add(rproc);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;

- ret = rproc_validate(rproc);
+ ret = device_add(dev);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;

--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project


2021-06-15 04:56:04

by Greg KH

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] remoteproc: core: Move validate before device add

On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 07:21:09PM -0700, Siddharth Gupta wrote:
> We can validate whether the remoteproc is correctly setup before
> making the cdev_add and device_add calls. This saves us the
> trouble of cleaning up later on.
>
> Signed-off-by: Siddharth Gupta <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)


<formletter>

This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
stable kernel tree. Please read:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
for how to do this properly.

</formletter>