The wrappers in include/linux/pci-dma-compat.h should go away.
The patch has been generated with the coccinelle script below.
expression e1, e2;
@@
- pci_set_dma_mask(e1, e2)
+ dma_set_mask(&e1->dev, e2)
@@
expression e1, e2;
@@
- pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(e1, e2)
+ dma_set_coherent_mask(&e1->dev, e2)
While at it, some 'dma_set_mask()/dma_set_coherent_mask()' have been
updated to a much less verbose 'dma_set_mask_and_coherent()'.
This type of patches has been going on for a long time, I plan to
clean it up in the near future. If needed, see post from
Christoph Hellwig on the kernel-janitors ML:
https://marc.info/?l=kernel-janitors&m=158745678307186&w=4
Signed-off-by: Qing Wang <[email protected]>
---
drivers/dma/plx_dma.c | 10 ++--------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma/plx_dma.c b/drivers/dma/plx_dma.c
index 1669345..1ffcb5c
--- a/drivers/dma/plx_dma.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/plx_dma.c
@@ -563,15 +563,9 @@ static int plx_dma_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
if (rc)
return rc;
- rc = pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, DMA_BIT_MASK(48));
+ rc = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(48));
if (rc)
- rc = pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
- if (rc)
- return rc;
-
- rc = pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(pdev, DMA_BIT_MASK(48));
- if (rc)
- rc = pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(pdev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
+ rc = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
if (rc)
return rc;
--
2.7.4
On 2021-09-17 1:18 a.m., Qing Wang wrote:
> The wrappers in include/linux/pci-dma-compat.h should go away.
>
> The patch has been generated with the coccinelle script below.
> expression e1, e2;
> @@
> - pci_set_dma_mask(e1, e2)
> + dma_set_mask(&e1->dev, e2)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2;
> @@
> - pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(e1, e2)
> + dma_set_coherent_mask(&e1->dev, e2)
>
> While at it, some 'dma_set_mask()/dma_set_coherent_mask()' have been
> updated to a much less verbose 'dma_set_mask_and_coherent()'.
>
> This type of patches has been going on for a long time, I plan to
> clean it up in the near future. If needed, see post from
> Christoph Hellwig on the kernel-janitors ML:
> https://marc.info/?l=kernel-janitors&m=158745678307186&w=4
>
> Signed-off-by: Qing Wang <[email protected]>
Looks good to me. Thanks.
Reviweed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <[email protected]>