2022-09-30 06:30:55

by Shradha Gupta

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/page_reporting: Add checks for page_reporting_order param

Current code allows the page_reporting_order parameter to be changed
via sysfs to any integer value. The new value is used immediately
in page reporting code with no validation, which could cause incorrect
behavior. Fix this by adding validation of the new value.
Export this parameter for use in the driver that is calling the
page_reporting_register().
This is needed by drivers like hv_balloon to know the order of the
pages reported. Traditionally the values provided in the kernel boot
line or subsequently changed via sysfs take priority therefore, if
page_reporting_order parameter's value is set, it takes precedence
over the value passed while registering with the driver.

Signed-off-by: Shradha Gupta <[email protected]>
---
mm/page_reporting.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/page_reporting.c b/mm/page_reporting.c
index 382958eef8a9..29d67c824fd2 100644
--- a/mm/page_reporting.c
+++ b/mm/page_reporting.c
@@ -11,10 +11,42 @@
#include "page_reporting.h"
#include "internal.h"

-unsigned int page_reporting_order = MAX_ORDER;
-module_param(page_reporting_order, uint, 0644);
+/* Initialize to an unsupported value */
+unsigned int page_reporting_order = -1;
+
+int page_order_update_notify(const char *val, const struct kernel_param *kp)
+{
+ /*
+ * If param is set beyond this limit, order is set to default
+ * pageblock_order value
+ */
+ return param_set_uint_minmax(val, kp, 0, MAX_ORDER-1);
+}
+
+const struct kernel_param_ops page_reporting_param_ops = {
+ .set = &page_order_update_notify,
+ /*
+ * For the get op, use param_get_int instead of param_get_uint.
+ * This is to make sure that when unset the initialized value of
+ * -1 is shown correctly
+ */
+ .get = &param_get_int,
+};
+
+module_param_cb(page_reporting_order, &page_reporting_param_ops,
+ &page_reporting_order, 0644);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(page_reporting_order, "Set page reporting order");

+/*
+ * This symbol is also a kernel parameter. Export the page_reporting_order
+ * symbol so that other drivers can access it to control order values without
+ * having to introduce another configurable parameter. Only one driver can
+ * register with the page_reporting driver for the service, so we have just
+ * one control parameter for the use case(which can be accessed in both
+ * drivers)
+ */
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(page_reporting_order);
+
#define PAGE_REPORTING_DELAY (2 * HZ)
static struct page_reporting_dev_info __rcu *pr_dev_info __read_mostly;

@@ -330,10 +362,18 @@ int page_reporting_register(struct page_reporting_dev_info *prdev)
}

/*
- * Update the page reporting order if it's specified by driver.
- * Otherwise, it falls back to @pageblock_order.
+ * If the page_reporting_order value is not set, we check if
+ * an order is provided from the driver that is performing the
+ * registration. If that is not provided either, we default to
+ * pageblock_order.
*/
- page_reporting_order = prdev->order ? : pageblock_order;
+
+ if (page_reporting_order == -1) {
+ if (prdev->order > 0 && prdev->order <= MAX_ORDER)
+ page_reporting_order = prdev->order;
+ else
+ page_reporting_order = pageblock_order;
+ }

/* initialize state and work structures */
atomic_set(&prdev->state, PAGE_REPORTING_IDLE);
--
2.37.2


2022-10-17 16:19:20

by Michael Kelley (LINUX)

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/page_reporting: Add checks for page_reporting_order param

From: Shradha Gupta <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2022 11:02 PM
>
> Current code allows the page_reporting_order parameter to be changed
> via sysfs to any integer value. The new value is used immediately
> in page reporting code with no validation, which could cause incorrect
> behavior. Fix this by adding validation of the new value.
> Export this parameter for use in the driver that is calling the
> page_reporting_register().
> This is needed by drivers like hv_balloon to know the order of the
> pages reported. Traditionally the values provided in the kernel boot
> line or subsequently changed via sysfs take priority therefore, if
> page_reporting_order parameter's value is set, it takes precedence
> over the value passed while registering with the driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shradha Gupta <[email protected]>
> ---
> mm/page_reporting.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_reporting.c b/mm/page_reporting.c
> index 382958eef8a9..29d67c824fd2 100644
> --- a/mm/page_reporting.c
> +++ b/mm/page_reporting.c
> @@ -11,10 +11,42 @@
> #include "page_reporting.h"
> #include "internal.h"
>
> -unsigned int page_reporting_order = MAX_ORDER;
> -module_param(page_reporting_order, uint, 0644);
> +/* Initialize to an unsupported value */
> +unsigned int page_reporting_order = -1;
> +
> +int page_order_update_notify(const char *val, const struct kernel_param *kp)
> +{
> + /*
> + * If param is set beyond this limit, order is set to default
> + * pageblock_order value
> + */
> + return param_set_uint_minmax(val, kp, 0, MAX_ORDER-1);
> +}
> +
> +const struct kernel_param_ops page_reporting_param_ops = {
> + .set = &page_order_update_notify,
> + /*
> + * For the get op, use param_get_int instead of param_get_uint.
> + * This is to make sure that when unset the initialized value of
> + * -1 is shown correctly
> + */
> + .get = &param_get_int,
> +};
> +
> +module_param_cb(page_reporting_order, &page_reporting_param_ops,
> + &page_reporting_order, 0644);
> MODULE_PARM_DESC(page_reporting_order, "Set page reporting order");
>
> +/*
> + * This symbol is also a kernel parameter. Export the page_reporting_order
> + * symbol so that other drivers can access it to control order values without
> + * having to introduce another configurable parameter. Only one driver can
> + * register with the page_reporting driver for the service, so we have just
> + * one control parameter for the use case(which can be accessed in both
> + * drivers)
> + */
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(page_reporting_order);
> +
> #define PAGE_REPORTING_DELAY (2 * HZ)
> static struct page_reporting_dev_info __rcu *pr_dev_info __read_mostly;
>
> @@ -330,10 +362,18 @@ int page_reporting_register(struct page_reporting_dev_info
> *prdev)
> }
>
> /*
> - * Update the page reporting order if it's specified by driver.
> - * Otherwise, it falls back to @pageblock_order.
> + * If the page_reporting_order value is not set, we check if
> + * an order is provided from the driver that is performing the
> + * registration. If that is not provided either, we default to
> + * pageblock_order.
> */
> - page_reporting_order = prdev->order ? : pageblock_order;
> +
> + if (page_reporting_order == -1) {
> + if (prdev->order > 0 && prdev->order <= MAX_ORDER)
> + page_reporting_order = prdev->order;
> + else
> + page_reporting_order = pageblock_order;
> + }
>
> /* initialize state and work structures */
> atomic_set(&prdev->state, PAGE_REPORTING_IDLE);
> --
> 2.37.2

Reviewed-by: Michael Kelley <[email protected]>

2022-10-26 15:49:34

by Wei Liu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/page_reporting: Add checks for page_reporting_order param

On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 11:01:38PM -0700, Shradha Gupta wrote:
> Current code allows the page_reporting_order parameter to be changed
> via sysfs to any integer value. The new value is used immediately
> in page reporting code with no validation, which could cause incorrect
> behavior. Fix this by adding validation of the new value.
> Export this parameter for use in the driver that is calling the
> page_reporting_register().
> This is needed by drivers like hv_balloon to know the order of the
> pages reported. Traditionally the values provided in the kernel boot
> line or subsequently changed via sysfs take priority therefore, if
> page_reporting_order parameter's value is set, it takes precedence
> over the value passed while registering with the driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shradha Gupta <[email protected]>

Andrew and other MM reviewers, can I get an ack / nack for this patch?

> ---
> mm/page_reporting.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_reporting.c b/mm/page_reporting.c
> index 382958eef8a9..29d67c824fd2 100644
> --- a/mm/page_reporting.c
> +++ b/mm/page_reporting.c
> @@ -11,10 +11,42 @@
> #include "page_reporting.h"
> #include "internal.h"
>
> -unsigned int page_reporting_order = MAX_ORDER;
> -module_param(page_reporting_order, uint, 0644);
> +/* Initialize to an unsupported value */
> +unsigned int page_reporting_order = -1;
> +
> +int page_order_update_notify(const char *val, const struct kernel_param *kp)
> +{
> + /*
> + * If param is set beyond this limit, order is set to default
> + * pageblock_order value
> + */
> + return param_set_uint_minmax(val, kp, 0, MAX_ORDER-1);
> +}
> +
> +const struct kernel_param_ops page_reporting_param_ops = {
> + .set = &page_order_update_notify,
> + /*
> + * For the get op, use param_get_int instead of param_get_uint.
> + * This is to make sure that when unset the initialized value of
> + * -1 is shown correctly
> + */
> + .get = &param_get_int,
> +};
> +
> +module_param_cb(page_reporting_order, &page_reporting_param_ops,
> + &page_reporting_order, 0644);
> MODULE_PARM_DESC(page_reporting_order, "Set page reporting order");
>
> +/*
> + * This symbol is also a kernel parameter. Export the page_reporting_order
> + * symbol so that other drivers can access it to control order values without
> + * having to introduce another configurable parameter. Only one driver can
> + * register with the page_reporting driver for the service, so we have just
> + * one control parameter for the use case(which can be accessed in both
> + * drivers)
> + */
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(page_reporting_order);
> +
> #define PAGE_REPORTING_DELAY (2 * HZ)
> static struct page_reporting_dev_info __rcu *pr_dev_info __read_mostly;
>
> @@ -330,10 +362,18 @@ int page_reporting_register(struct page_reporting_dev_info *prdev)
> }
>
> /*
> - * Update the page reporting order if it's specified by driver.
> - * Otherwise, it falls back to @pageblock_order.
> + * If the page_reporting_order value is not set, we check if
> + * an order is provided from the driver that is performing the
> + * registration. If that is not provided either, we default to
> + * pageblock_order.
> */
> - page_reporting_order = prdev->order ? : pageblock_order;
> +
> + if (page_reporting_order == -1) {
> + if (prdev->order > 0 && prdev->order <= MAX_ORDER)
> + page_reporting_order = prdev->order;
> + else
> + page_reporting_order = pageblock_order;
> + }
>
> /* initialize state and work structures */
> atomic_set(&prdev->state, PAGE_REPORTING_IDLE);
> --
> 2.37.2
>

2022-10-27 20:35:38

by Andrew Morton

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/page_reporting: Add checks for page_reporting_order param

On Wed, 26 Oct 2022 15:33:47 +0000 Wei Liu <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 11:01:38PM -0700, Shradha Gupta wrote:
> > Current code allows the page_reporting_order parameter to be changed
> > via sysfs to any integer value. The new value is used immediately
> > in page reporting code with no validation, which could cause incorrect
> > behavior. Fix this by adding validation of the new value.
> > Export this parameter for use in the driver that is calling the
> > page_reporting_register().
> > This is needed by drivers like hv_balloon to know the order of the
> > pages reported. Traditionally the values provided in the kernel boot
> > line or subsequently changed via sysfs take priority therefore, if
> > page_reporting_order parameter's value is set, it takes precedence
> > over the value passed while registering with the driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shradha Gupta <[email protected]>
>
> Andrew and other MM reviewers, can I get an ack / nack for this patch?

Looks OK to me. Can this be merged via the hyperv tree?

2022-10-28 10:58:26

by Wei Liu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/page_reporting: Add checks for page_reporting_order param

On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 01:22:07PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Oct 2022 15:33:47 +0000 Wei Liu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 11:01:38PM -0700, Shradha Gupta wrote:
> > > Current code allows the page_reporting_order parameter to be changed
> > > via sysfs to any integer value. The new value is used immediately
> > > in page reporting code with no validation, which could cause incorrect
> > > behavior. Fix this by adding validation of the new value.
> > > Export this parameter for use in the driver that is calling the
> > > page_reporting_register().
> > > This is needed by drivers like hv_balloon to know the order of the
> > > pages reported. Traditionally the values provided in the kernel boot
> > > line or subsequently changed via sysfs take priority therefore, if
> > > page_reporting_order parameter's value is set, it takes precedence
> > > over the value passed while registering with the driver.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Shradha Gupta <[email protected]>
> >
> > Andrew and other MM reviewers, can I get an ack / nack for this patch?
>
> Looks OK to me. Can this be merged via the hyperv tree?

Yes, I can take of merging it.

I will add your acked-by to the patch.

Thanks,
Wei.