2023-06-07 11:09:29

by Varadarajan Narayanan

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 2/9] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,m31: Document qcom,m31 USB phy

Document the M31 USB2 phy present in IPQ5332

Signed-off-by: Sricharan Ramabadhran <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <[email protected]>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,m31.yaml | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 69 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,m31.yaml

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,m31.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,m31.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8ad4ba4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,m31.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
+
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/qcom,m31.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Qualcomm M31 USB PHY
+
+maintainers:
+ - Sricharan Ramabadhran <[email protected]>
+ - Varadarajan Narayanan <[email protected]>
+
+description:
+ This file contains documentation for the USB M31 PHY found in Qualcomm
+ IPQ5018, IPQ5332 SoCs.
+
+properties:
+ compatible:
+ oneOf:
+ - items:
+ - enum:
+ - qcom,m31-usb-hsphy
+ - qcom,ipq5332-m31-usb-hsphy
+
+ reg:
+ description:
+ Offset and length of the M31 PHY register set
+ maxItems: 2
+
+ reg-names:
+ items:
+ - const: m31usb_phy_base
+ - const: qscratch_base
+
+ phy_type:
+ oneOf:
+ - items:
+ - enum:
+ - utmi
+ - ulpi
+
+ resets:
+ maxItems: 1
+ description:
+ List of phandles and reset pairs, one for each entry in reset-names.
+
+ reset-names:
+ items:
+ - const:
+ usb2_phy_reset
+
+additionalProperties: false
+
+examples:
+ - |
+ #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,ipq5332-gcc.h>
+ hs_m31phy_0: hs_m31phy@5b00 {
+ compatible = "qcom,m31-usb-hsphy";
+ reg = <0x5b000 0x3000>,
+ <0x08af8800 0x400>;
+ reg-names = "m31usb_phy_base",
+ "qscratch_base";
+ phy_type = "utmi";
+ resets = <&gcc GCC_QUSB2_0_PHY_BCR>;
+ reset-names = "usb2_phy_reset";
+
+ status = "ok";
+ };
--
2.7.4



2023-06-07 11:49:49

by Rob Herring (Arm)

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,m31: Document qcom,m31 USB phy


On Wed, 07 Jun 2023 16:26:06 +0530, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> Document the M31 USB2 phy present in IPQ5332
>
> Signed-off-by: Sricharan Ramabadhran <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <[email protected]>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,m31.yaml | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,m31.yaml
>

My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):

yamllint warnings/errors:

dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
/builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,m31.example.dtb: hs_m31phy@5b00: status:0: 'ok' is not one of ['okay', 'disabled', 'reserved']
From schema: /usr/local/lib/python3.10/dist-packages/dtschema/schemas/dt-core.yaml

doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):

See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/14f60578e2935c0844537eab162af3afa52ffe39.1686126439.git.quic_varada@quicinc.com

The base for the series is generally the latest rc1. A different dependency
should be noted in *this* patch.

If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to
date:

pip3 install dtschema --upgrade

Please check and re-submit after running the above command yourself. Note
that DT_SCHEMA_FILES can be set to your schema file to speed up checking
your schema. However, it must be unset to test all examples with your schema.


2023-06-07 19:01:00

by Krzysztof Kozlowski

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,m31: Document qcom,m31 USB phy

On 07/06/2023 12:56, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> Document the M31 USB2 phy present in IPQ5332

Full stop.

>
> Signed-off-by: Sricharan Ramabadhran <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <[email protected]>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,m31.yaml | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,m31.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,m31.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,m31.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..8ad4ba4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,m31.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +

Drop stray blank lines.

> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/qcom,m31.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Qualcomm M31 USB PHY

What is M31?

> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Sricharan Ramabadhran <[email protected]>
> + - Varadarajan Narayanan <[email protected]>
> +
> +description:
> + This file contains documentation for the USB M31 PHY found in Qualcomm

Drop redundant parts ("This file contains documentation for the").

> + IPQ5018, IPQ5332 SoCs.
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + oneOf:

That's not oneOf.

> + - items:

No items.

> + - enum:
> + - qcom,m31-usb-hsphy

I am confused what's this. If m31 is coming from some IP block provider,
then you are using wrong vendor prefix.
https://www.m31tech.com/download_file/M31_USB.pdf


> + - qcom,ipq5332-m31-usb-hsphy

This confuses me even more. IPQ m31?

> +
> + reg:
> + description:
> + Offset and length of the M31 PHY register set

Drop description, obvious.

> + maxItems: 2
> +
> + reg-names:
> + items:
> + - const: m31usb_phy_base
> + - const: qscratch_base

Drop "_base" from both.

> +
> + phy_type:
> + oneOf:
> + - items:
> + - enum:
> + - utmi
> + - ulpi

This does not belong to phy, but to USB node.

> +
> + resets:
> + maxItems: 1
> + description:
> + List of phandles and reset pairs, one for each entry in reset-names.

Drop useless description.

> +
> + reset-names:
> + items:
> + - const:
> + usb2_phy_reset

Drop entire reset-names.

> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,ipq5332-gcc.h>
> + hs_m31phy_0: hs_m31phy@5b00 {

Node names should be generic. See also explanation and list of examples
in DT specification:
https://devicetree-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/chapter2-devicetree-basics.html#generic-names-recommendation

Also, no underscores in node names.

> + compatible = "qcom,m31-usb-hsphy";
> + reg = <0x5b000 0x3000>,

This is not what your unit address is saying.

> + <0x08af8800 0x400>;

Align it.

> + reg-names = "m31usb_phy_base",
> + "qscratch_base";

Align it.

> + phy_type = "utmi";
> + resets = <&gcc GCC_QUSB2_0_PHY_BCR>;
> + reset-names = "usb2_phy_reset";
> +
> + status = "ok";

Drop.

> + };

Best regards,
Krzysztof


2023-06-15 05:47:10

by Varadarajan Narayanan

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,m31: Document qcom,m31 USB phy

On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 08:31:50PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 07/06/2023 12:56, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> > Document the M31 USB2 phy present in IPQ5332
>
> Full stop.

Ok.

> > Signed-off-by: Sricharan Ramabadhran <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,m31.yaml | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,m31.yaml
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,m31.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,m31.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..8ad4ba4
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,m31.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > +
>
> Drop stray blank lines.

Ok.

> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/qcom,m31.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: Qualcomm M31 USB PHY
>
> What is M31?

M31 is an external IP integrated into IPQ5332 SoC.

> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > + - Sricharan Ramabadhran <[email protected]>
> > + - Varadarajan Narayanan <[email protected]>
> > +
> > +description:
> > + This file contains documentation for the USB M31 PHY found in Qualcomm
>
> Drop redundant parts ("This file contains documentation for the").

Ok.

> > + IPQ5018, IPQ5332 SoCs.
> > +
> > +properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + oneOf:
>
> That's not oneOf.

Ok.

> > + - items:
>
> No items.

Ok.

> > + - enum:
> > + - qcom,m31-usb-hsphy
>
> I am confused what's this. If m31 is coming from some IP block provider,
> then you are using wrong vendor prefix.
> https://www.m31tech.com/download_file/M31_USB.pdf
>
>
> > + - qcom,ipq5332-m31-usb-hsphy
>
> This confuses me even more. IPQ m31?

Will change this to m31,usb-hsphy and m31,ipq5332-usb-hsphy respectively.
Will that be acceptable?

> > +
> > + reg:
> > + description:
> > + Offset and length of the M31 PHY register set
>
> Drop description, obvious.

Ok.

> > + maxItems: 2
> > +
> > + reg-names:
> > + items:
> > + - const: m31usb_phy_base
> > + - const: qscratch_base
>
> Drop "_base" from both.

Ok. Will drop qscratch_base. This is in the controller space.
Should not come here.

> > +
> > + phy_type:
> > + oneOf:
> > + - items:
> > + - enum:
> > + - utmi
> > + - ulpi
>
> This does not belong to phy, but to USB node.

This is used by the driver to set a bit during phy init. Hence
have it as a replication of the USB node's entry. If this is not
permissible, is there some way to get this from the USB node,
or any other alternative mechanism?

> > +
> > + resets:
> > + maxItems: 1
> > + description:
> > + List of phandles and reset pairs, one for each entry in reset-names.
>
> Drop useless description.

Ok.

> > +
> > + reset-names:
> > + items:
> > + - const:
> > + usb2_phy_reset
>
> Drop entire reset-names.

Ok.

> > +
> > +additionalProperties: false
> > +
> > +examples:
> > + - |
> > + #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,ipq5332-gcc.h>
> > + hs_m31phy_0: hs_m31phy@5b00 {
>
> Node names should be generic. See also explanation and list of examples
> in DT specification:
> https://devicetree-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/chapter2-devicetree-basics.html#generic-names-recommendation
>
> Also, no underscores in node names.

Will change this as usbphy0:hs_m31phy@7b000

> > + compatible = "qcom,m31-usb-hsphy";
> > + reg = <0x5b000 0x3000>,
>
> This is not what your unit address is saying.

Will change to 0x0007b000.

> > + <0x08af8800 0x400>;
>
> Align it.

Will drop this. This is in the controller space.

> > + reg-names = "m31usb_phy_base",
> > + "qscratch_base";
>
> Align it.

Ok.

> > + phy_type = "utmi";
> > + resets = <&gcc GCC_QUSB2_0_PHY_BCR>;
> > + reset-names = "usb2_phy_reset";
> > +
> > + status = "ok";
>
> Drop.

Ok. Hopefully will get an alternative for the phy_type.

Thanks
Varada

> > + };
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>

2023-06-17 09:47:50

by Krzysztof Kozlowski

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,m31: Document qcom,m31 USB phy

On 15/06/2023 07:27, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
>>> + - enum:
>>> + - qcom,m31-usb-hsphy
>>
>> I am confused what's this. If m31 is coming from some IP block provider,
>> then you are using wrong vendor prefix.
>> https://www.m31tech.com/download_file/M31_USB.pdf
>>
>>
>>> + - qcom,ipq5332-m31-usb-hsphy
>>
>> This confuses me even more. IPQ m31?
>
> Will change this to m31,usb-hsphy and m31,ipq5332-usb-hsphy respectively.
> Will that be acceptable?

m31,ipq5332 seems wrong, as m31 did not create ipq5332. Does the m31
device have some name/version/model? If it is not really known, then I
would just propose to go with qcom,ipq5332-usb-hsphy.

Skip generic compatible ("usb-hsphy") entirely.

And then we have... existing bindings qcom,usb-hs-phy.yaml. Don't create
something similar with difference in the hyphen. Just use device
specific compatible thus device specific filename.

>
>>> +
>>> + reg:
>>> + description:
>>> + Offset and length of the M31 PHY register set
>>
>> Drop description, obvious.
>
> Ok.
>
>>> + maxItems: 2
>>> +
>>> + reg-names:
>>> + items:
>>> + - const: m31usb_phy_base
>>> + - const: qscratch_base
>>
>> Drop "_base" from both.
>
> Ok. Will drop qscratch_base. This is in the controller space.
> Should not come here.

Then drop reg-names entirely.

>
>>> +
>>> + phy_type:
>>> + oneOf:
>>> + - items:
>>> + - enum:
>>> + - utmi
>>> + - ulpi
>>
>> This does not belong to phy, but to USB node.
>
> This is used by the driver to set a bit during phy init. Hence
> have it as a replication of the USB node's entry. If this is not
> permissible, is there some way to get this from the USB node,
> or any other alternative mechanism?

Shouldn't USB controller choose what type of PHY type it wants?

>
>>> +
>>> +additionalProperties: false
>>> +
>>> +examples:
>>> + - |
>>> + #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,ipq5332-gcc.h>
>>> + hs_m31phy_0: hs_m31phy@5b00 {
>>
>> Node names should be generic. See also explanation and list of examples
>> in DT specification:
>> https://devicetree-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/chapter2-devicetree-basics.html#generic-names-recommendation
>>
>> Also, no underscores in node names.
>
> Will change this as usbphy0:hs_m31phy@7b000

This does not solve my comments. I did not write "label" but "node name".

Best regards,
Krzysztof


2023-06-20 09:51:21

by Varadarajan Narayanan

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,m31: Document qcom,m31 USB phy

On Sat, Jun 17, 2023 at 10:48:41AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 15/06/2023 07:27, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> >>> + - enum:
> >>> + - qcom,m31-usb-hsphy
> >>
> >> I am confused what's this. If m31 is coming from some IP block provider,
> >> then you are using wrong vendor prefix.
> >> https://www.m31tech.com/download_file/M31_USB.pdf
> >>
> >>
> >>> + - qcom,ipq5332-m31-usb-hsphy
> >>
> >> This confuses me even more. IPQ m31?
> >
> > Will change this to m31,usb-hsphy and m31,ipq5332-usb-hsphy respectively.
> > Will that be acceptable?
>
> m31,ipq5332 seems wrong, as m31 did not create ipq5332. Does the m31
> device have some name/version/model? If it is not really known, then I
> would just propose to go with qcom,ipq5332-usb-hsphy.
>
> Skip generic compatible ("usb-hsphy") entirely.

Ok.

> And then we have... existing bindings qcom,usb-hs-phy.yaml. Don't create
> something similar with difference in the hyphen. Just use device
> specific compatible thus device specific filename.

qcom,usb-hs-phy.yaml seems to be for ULPI mode phy and the
driver we are introducing is for UTMI. We would have to
modify phy-qcom-usb-hs.c to accomodate M31. Will that be
acceptable to phy-qcom-usb-hs.c owners/maintainers?

> >>> +
> >>> + reg:
> >>> + description:
> >>> + Offset and length of the M31 PHY register set
> >>
> >> Drop description, obvious.
> >
> > Ok.
> >
> >>> + maxItems: 2
> >>> +
> >>> + reg-names:
> >>> + items:
> >>> + - const: m31usb_phy_base
> >>> + - const: qscratch_base
> >>
> >> Drop "_base" from both.
> >
> > Ok. Will drop qscratch_base. This is in the controller space.
> > Should not come here.
>
> Then drop reg-names entirely.

Ok.

> >>> +
> >>> + phy_type:
> >>> + oneOf:
> >>> + - items:
> >>> + - enum:
> >>> + - utmi
> >>> + - ulpi
> >>
> >> This does not belong to phy, but to USB node.
> >
> > This is used by the driver to set a bit during phy init. Hence
> > have it as a replication of the USB node's entry. If this is not
> > permissible, is there some way to get this from the USB node,
> > or any other alternative mechanism?
>
> Shouldn't USB controller choose what type of PHY type it wants?

Will remove this. IPQ5332 uses it in UTMI mode only.

> >>> +
> >>> +additionalProperties: false
> >>> +
> >>> +examples:
> >>> + - |
> >>> + #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,ipq5332-gcc.h>
> >>> + hs_m31phy_0: hs_m31phy@5b00 {
> >>
> >> Node names should be generic. See also explanation and list of examples
> >> in DT specification:
> >> https://devicetree-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/chapter2-devicetree-basics.html#generic-names-recommendation
> >>
> >> Also, no underscores in node names.
> >
> > Will change this as usbphy0:hs_m31phy@7b000
>
> This does not solve my comments. I did not write "label" but "node name".

Sorry. will fix it.

Thanks
Varada

2023-06-21 09:12:38

by Krzysztof Kozlowski

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,m31: Document qcom,m31 USB phy

On 20/06/2023 11:32, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:

>
>> And then we have... existing bindings qcom,usb-hs-phy.yaml. Don't create
>> something similar with difference in the hyphen. Just use device
>> specific compatible thus device specific filename.
>
> qcom,usb-hs-phy.yaml seems to be for ULPI mode phy and the
> driver we are introducing is for UTMI. We would have to
> modify phy-qcom-usb-hs.c to accomodate M31. Will that be
> acceptable to phy-qcom-usb-hs.c owners/maintainers?

We don't talk about drivers here but bindings. Why would you need to
modify the driver when introducing new binding for different device?



Best regards,
Krzysztof


2023-06-21 10:17:45

by Varadarajan Narayanan

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,m31: Document qcom,m31 USB phy

On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 10:43:38AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 20/06/2023 11:32, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
>
> >
> >> And then we have... existing bindings qcom,usb-hs-phy.yaml. Don't create
> >> something similar with difference in the hyphen. Just use device
> >> specific compatible thus device specific filename.
> >
> > qcom,usb-hs-phy.yaml seems to be for ULPI mode phy and the
> > driver we are introducing is for UTMI. We would have to
> > modify phy-qcom-usb-hs.c to accomodate M31. Will that be
> > acceptable to phy-qcom-usb-hs.c owners/maintainers?
>
> We don't talk about drivers here but bindings. Why would you need to
> modify the driver when introducing new binding for different device?

Sorry. I misunderstood your feedback as "use the existing bindings".

Will name the bindings file as qcom,ipq5332-usb-hsphy.yaml and post
the next version.

Thanks
Varada